Watch: City Announces Fair Rent Commission

State Senator Marilyn Moore joined Mayor Joe Ganim and City Council members on Thursday to announce a new seven-member Fair Rent Commission that will mediate issues between landlords and tenants. OIB commentator John Marshall Lee received several shout outs for his advocacy to create a commission.

News release from Mayor’s Office:

Today, Mayor Ganim announced the re-establishment of the Fair Rent Commission in the City of Bridgeport. The re-establishment of the commission has been through a partnership between the Mayor’s Administration and the Bridgeport City Council, which recently readopted a modified Fair Rent ordinance. The Mayor and Council were joined by State Senator Marilyn Moore who helped champion state legislation to support the creation of Fair Rent commissions around the state, as well as a number of community stakeholders that are working to address the issues around affordable housing throughout the city.

The commission, which will be made up of seven members, will help to mediate disputes between landlords and renters regarding rents that might be deemed “excessive.” Three of the seven members of the commission were sworn in by Mayor Ganim today. If mediation is not successful, the Fair Rent Commission is empowered under state statute and local ordinance to set a fair rent, among other remedies. The commission will be supported and staffed by a full-time, bilingual city Fair Rent Coordinator who will handle all cases reported to the commission, help mediate disputes, and serve as clerk to the commission. Residents are encouraged to call 203-576-8323 to reach the Fair Rent Coordinator.

The Fair Rent Commission is ultimately one of the many tools being employed by the City of Bridgeport to address affordability of housing in the city, especially due to recent years of high inflation. The median household income within Bridgeport is reported to be $50,597 whereas the average cost of a two-bedroom apartment in Fairfield County is $2,076, which may result in a Bridgeport family spending more than 50% of their income on housing-related needs. According to the Connecticut General Statute 8-30g, it is recommended housing cost not to exceed 30% of household income. The commission will be tasked with dealing with specific rental increases that are deemed to be excessive in nature.

“The establishment of the Fair Rent Commission is exactly what Bridgeport needs to address the issues that many of our residents face in terms of affordable housing,” stated Mayor Ganim. “The fact that many Bridgeport households are possibly using half of their income on housing-related needs makes our residents vulnerable. I am thankful to all of those involved in the re-establishment of the Fair Rent Commission. And as we do our part here in Bridgeport to address the affordability crisis, I call on elected officials in other towns and cities throughout the state to do the same.”

The Fair Rent Commission is expected to have its first organizational meeting in the coming weeks. Meanwhile, cases can be filed with the Fair Rent Commission by downloading the appropriate documents from the City of Bridgeport’s website. The documents will be made available in both English and Spanish. Further information on the Fair Rent Office and the Fair Rent Commission will be forthcoming as progress is made to establish their schedule and operating procedures.

 

Role of the Fair Rent Commission

2.94.010 Purpose.

Pursuant to and in conformity with Sections 7-148b through 7-148f of the Connecticut General Statutes, there is created a commission known as the fair rent commission for the purpose of regulating and eliminating excessive rental charges on residential property within the city. This chapter is enacted in recognition of the compelling need for rent stabilization for the duration of a severe housing shortage in the city.

(Ord. dated 6/5/23 , Exh. A; Ord. dated 10-3-22 , Exh. A; Prior code § 16-131)

 

2.94.020 Definitions.

Unless the context specifically indicates otherwise, the meaning of terms used in this chapter shall be as follows:

“Commission” means the fair rent commission of the city.

“Housing accommodation” means any building or structure, wholly or in part, containing living quarters occupied or fairly intended for occupancy as a place of residence, and including any land or building appurtenant thereto, except the following:

1.       A hospital, convent, monastery, asylum, public institution operated exclusively for charitable or educational purposes;

2.       Any housing accommodations owned and operated by the United States, the state of Connecticut, the housing authority of the city, the city or by any agency or political subdivision of said governmental entities;

3.       Housing accommodations exempted by Section 7-148b of the Connecticut General Statutes, as amended;

4.       Any building or structure which contains three units or less at least one of which is occupied by the owner of said building or structure.

“Landlord” means any person who leases, subleases, rents or permits the occupancy of any housing accommodation, including a person who manages a housing accommodation owned by someone else.

“Rent or rental charges” means any consideration, monetary or otherwise, including any bonus, benefit or gratuity, demanded or received, for the use or occupancy of any housing accommodations.

“Tenant” means any person who leases or rents, whether by written or oral lease, any housing accommodation, as a residence for himself/herself and/or his or her immediate family.

“Liaison of the City Council” means a member of the City Council of the City of Bridgeport, serving as a reporter to and from the City Council of the City of Bridgeport.

(Ord. dated 6/5/23 , Exh. A; Ord. dated 10-3-22 , Exh. A; Prior code § 16-132)

 

2.94.030 Membership.

A.       The fair rent commission shall consist of seven members all of whom shall be resident electors of the city. Of the seven members, at least one shall be a landlord and one shall be a tenant.

B.       In addition, the members shall be appointed by the mayor and/or the President of the City Council for the City of Bridgeport, subject to approval by the common council. The commission shall elect from its members a chairman and a vice-chairman. The common council may, by two-thirds vote, remove any member of the commission for cause.

(Ord. dated 6/5/23 , Exh. A; Ord. dated 10-3-22 , Exh. A; Prior code § 16-133)

 

2.94.040 Members’ terms.

The initial members of the commission shall be appointed for terms which shall commence as of the date of their appointment and end on the date set forth below:

 Term

Members

Ending one year from enactment of ordinance codified in this chapter

Two

Ending two years from enactment of ordinance codified in this chapter

Three

Ending three years from enactment of ordinance codified in this chapter

Two

Thereafter, each appointment shall be for a term of three years. In the event of the death, resignation or inability to serve on the part of any members of the commission, a successor shall be appointed to fill the unexpired term of the member as set forth in Section 2.94.030 of this chapter.

(Ord. dated 6/5/23 , Exh. A; Ord. dated 10-3-22 , Exh. A; Prior code § 16-134)

 

2.94.050 Staff.

The commission may request that a director be appointed by the mayor/or the President of the City Council for the City of Bridgeport, with the approval of the common council to keep its records, to handle any correspondence, to supervise and direct the administration of this chapter, and generally to perform such other functions as may be assigned by the commission. The commission may petition the budget committee of the city council to allocate funds for the hiring of additional employees to assist the commission. Upon request, assistance from other municipal agencies shall be reasonably available to the commission.

(Ord. dated 6/5/23 , Exh. A; Ord. dated 10-3-22 , Exh. A; Prior code § 16-135)

 

2.94.060 Quorum and procedures.

A quorum for any hearings or meetings of the commission shall consist of four members, and shall be empowered to conduct said hearings and render orders and decisions pursuant thereto. The commission shall conduct regular meetings to transact whatever business is before said commission. The commission shall determine the time, date and place of said special meetings and shall announce the same at least twenty-four (24) hours in advance of said meetings.

(Ord. dated 6/5/23 , Exh. A; Ord. dated 10-3-22 , Exh. A; Prior code § 16-136)

 

2.94.070 Powers.

Pursuant to Sections 7-148b through 7-148-e, Connecticut General Statutes, the commission shall have the following powers:

A.       To make such studies and investigations into rentals charged for housing accommodations within the city as it deems appropriate to carry out its responsibilities under this chapter;

B.       To receive complaints, inquiries and other communications concerning alleged excessive rental charges in housing accommodations within the city;

C.       To conduct hearings on complaints or requests for investigations submitted to it by any tenant or any landlord. One week notice by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid shall be given to the parties involved in such complaint. If any notice is returned without having been delivered, the commission may arrange for service by a deputy sheriff, constable of the city or indifferent person in the same manner as is provided in the General Statutes of the state for services of process in a civil action;

D.       To request the assistance of any department of the city government, including any available records, information or expert witness which the department may have in its employ;

E.       To hire or retain any expert real estate appraisers or other competent experts to advise it;

F.       To administer oaths;

G.       To subpoena witnesses and compel their attendance at said hearings and to compel the production of any books or documents relating to any matter before the commission;

H.       To determine, after a hearing, whether the rent for any housing accommodation is so excessive as to be harsh and unconscionable;

I.        To order a reduction of any excessive rent which is deemed to be harsh and unconscionable (as determined according to standards described in Section 2.94.080) to an amount the commission considers fair and equitable. However, the commission shall not have the power to waive any rent which has become due prior to the filing date of the complaint. In its discretion the commission may make the order retroactive to the date of the tenant’s complaint. Such order shall be in effect for a period of one year from its effective date, except if the commission shall, pursuant to a subsequent petition by the landlord or tenant at any time, order that the rent be changed;

J.        To dismiss a complaint;

K.       To continue, review, amend, terminate or suspend all its orders and decisions;

L. 1. If the commission determines after a hearing that a housing accommodation fails to comply with the city’s housing code laws or any state or city statute or regulation relating to health and safety, the commission may order the tenant to pay the fair and equitable rent, as determined by the commission, to the commission.

2.       The commission shall hold such rent in an escrow account, as provided in this chapter, until the landlord makes such repairs as are required to bring the housing accommodation into compliance with such laws, statutes or regulations.

3.       If the landlord shall have corrected such violations after the order reducing the rent, and if the rent had been reduced solely because of such violations, the landlord may petition the commission for the reinstatement of the original rent and for the payment to him/her of the rent held in the escrow account.

4.       If the landlord shall have corrected such violations after the order for reducing the rent, but the rent had not been reduced solely because of such violations, the landlord may petition the commission for an order fixing a fair and equitable rent for such housing accommodation in light of its condition at the time of the landlord’s petition, and for the payment to him of the rent held in the escrow account.

5.       In any case arising under this subsection, upon reasonable determination of the commission, the original rent or such fair and equitable rent as determined by the commission, may be ordered into effect retroactive at the discretion of the commission, to the date of the petition for reinstatement. No such reinstate shall be effective until after a hearing is held by the commission in accordance with the provisions of subsection C of this section;

M.      To deposit into the escrow account rent paid to the commission by tenants when their landlord refuses to accept it or the landlord requests in writing that the commission hold the rent until the complaint or claim can be resolved either through mediation or hearing;

N.       To establish an escrow account with a local bank or financial institution into which it shall deposit all rents or other funds paid to it pursuant to subsections L, M and N of this section. If rent is deposited into the escrow account pursuant to subsection L, such funds shall be released to the landlord if: (1) he shall be successful in an appeal to the court or (2) if the commission shall order such release after petition in accordance with subsection L of this section. If rent is deposited into the escrow account pursuant to subsection M or N of this section, such funds shall be withdrawn from the escrow account and paid to the landlord upon written request from the landlord;

O.       Interest earned on said escrow account shall be awarded to the landlord;

P.       To require the city attorney to institute, and the city attorney shall then institute, an action in any court of equity for either a temporary or final injunction, restraining violation of or directing compliance with any order made pursuant to any provision of this chapter. Such direction to the city attorney shall be written by the chairman of the commission or by his designee upon the majority vote of the commission;

Q.       Attempt through its director, through the process of conciliation and negotiation between a tenant and a landlord, to arrive at a rental agreement which is mutually acceptable to said tenant and landlord before initiating the formal hearing process.

(Ord. dated 6/5/23 , Exh. A; Ord. dated 10-3-22 , Exh. A; Prior code § 16-137)

 

2.94.080 Standards.

In determining whether a rental charge is so excessive, with due regard to all circumstances, as to be harsh and unconscionable, a fair rent commission shall consider such all factors set forth in Section 7-148c of the Connecticut General Statutes, as amended.

(Ord. dated 6/5/23 , Exh. A; Ord. dated 10-3-22 , Exh. A; Prior code § 16-138)

 

2.94.090 Procedures.

A.       Pending a determination by the fair rent commission, the tenant shall pay to the landlord the last agreed-upon rent prior to the bringing of a complaint to this commission.

B.       All proceedings shall continue regardless of the fact that a tenant may quit housing accommodation in question and notwithstanding any attempt, successful or otherwise, to evict said tenant. No sale, assignment or transfer of housing accommodation in question shall be cause for discontinuing any pending proceeding, nor shall it affect the rights, duties and obligations of the commission or the parties thereto.

C.       Any person aggrieved by any order of the commission may appeal to the superior court, such appeal to be taken within thirty days after the rendering of the order in question. Any such appeal shall be considered a privileged matter with respect to the order of trial.

(Ord. dated 6/5/23 , Exh. A; Ord. dated 10-3-22 , Exh. A; Prior code § 16-139)

 

2.94.100 Eligibility to file complaint.

Any tenant, except those who live in a building or structure exempt under the definition of “housing accommodation” in Section 2.94.020 of this chapter, shall be eligible to file a complaint with the commission. It shall be a defense to any complaint before the commission that the tenant is in violation of Section 101-26 of the Bridgeport housing and commercial code entitled “Tenant’s responsibilities” or is otherwise responsible for damages to the landlord’s premises, other than ordinary wear and tear. If the commission finds, after a hearing, that the tenant is responsible for such damages, other than ordinary wear and tear, it shall not make a determination in regard to such complaint until such time as the tenant has paid into escrow with the commission an amount sufficient to pay for such damages, as determined by the commission.

(Ord. dated 6/5/23 , Exh. A; Ord. dated 10-3-22 , Exh. A; Prior code § 16-140)

 

2.94.110 Violation—Penalties.

Any person who shall violate any order of rent reduction or rent suspension by demanding, accepting or receiving an amount in excess thereof while such order remains in effect, or any other provision of this chapter or any person who shall refuse to obey any subpoena, order or direction of the commission pursuant thereto shall be fined not less than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) nor more than one hundred dollars ($100.00) for each such offense. If such offense continues for more than five days, it shall constitute a new offense for each day it continues to exist thereafter. No action shall be taken on any such violation by the prosecuting authorities of the city except upon written complaint of the chairman of the commission or his designee.

(Ord. dated 6/5/23 , Exh. A; Ord. dated 10-3-22 , Exh. A; Prior code § 16-141)

0
Share

8 comments

  1. Congratulations JML!

    Why was Matt McCarthy , a fiscally fit Councilman , completely eviscerated from key committee assignments by Aidee Nieves?

    Inquiring minds would like to know???

    6+
  2. Thank each of you who observed the notice of City failures in efficient handling of the Charter responsibility to maintain Commissions and Boards at full capacity within expiry of such appointments.
    When Tom Gaudett referred to the Fair Rent Commission swearing in today, he termed it a re-launch. If that were accurate then this “vessel” has been high and dry for too many years. Providing the details of the new body informs us less than a purposeful intro to why we fell twenty years behind in this case and why we end up behind other cities at this time in a City where so many folks are renters, facing increasing rent price pressures.
    Thank yous all around to the City Council persons who participated in the resuscitation of the expired body as well as State Senator Moore from her vantage point. In her comments today, she indicated that housing affordability and tenant unions were also items for the City to observe, review, and change, where required.
    And ACTION on a Fair Housing Commission is required as it died about the same time as FRC. How about it Joe? Bringing things to life is not impossible, is it? Focus, caring, and good will to encourage your residents to take up an expanded practice of democratic behavior through tenant unions, as well as showing the way to proceed from RENTING to OWNING your own home is part of the American dream, isn’t it? Can you offer such opportunities within the City? Time will tell.

    10+
  3. John, wouldn’t the term “resurrection” be more fitting than “resuscitation for an expired body of more than 20 years? Especially, if bringing things to life is not impossible, is it? According to Christendom, You know that JC things that many people, including people of color, believe. i would have to say even the Buddhist. Resurrection-ish 🤣

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlIrI80og8c

    John, if G2 keeps it up, you will be high and dry on emotion-base voting #white supremacy? 🙃

    While I do believe the Fair Housing Commission is progress as an avenue for people/renters to seek help for being exploited in the current state of affairs with the cost of living, particularly rent. Let’s not forget the
    invisible hand of the free market, supply, and demand can’t be overlooked.

    John, focus, caring, and goodwill can perhaps encourage Port residents to take up an expanded the practice of democratic behavior through tenant unions, as well as show the way to proceed from RENTING to OWNING your own home is part of the American dream. But who’s the owner renting to sell? Wouldn’t that be the same as a mortgage?

    Based on the CC meeting where you spoke for the “resurrection/resuscitation” of a Fair Housing Commission I think that tenant unions things should stay the course and focus on not just the affordability but the quality and condition, that several residents/tenants spoke of at that CC meeting. It was quite heartfelt.

    P.S. While owning a home may be an American dream you know it is impossible for everyone living in American ot own a home. Or should we wait for time to tell? Until then, I hope you speak on the dreamers who dream of owning a home in America but still rent, that the quality is present as well as the affordable, and use that money on more enjoyable things/wants than on the things/needs, shelter.

    # dreams/resuscitation/resurrection

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ix7TUGVYIo

    0
  4. Thank you to those who have listened to my critique of a series of mayors including John Fabrizi, Bill Finch, and most recently Joseph Ganim. All were elected to the office of Mayor and/or re-elected but they have not observed their full responsibility to appoint qualified, competent, and motivated City residents and registered voters to the large number of Boards and Commissions in existence. (Not all of them appear on the City website as a matter of fact!)

    To th point, as Tom Gaudett announced at the Thursday press conference, the Fair Rent Commission, was re-launched over the past year, by the attention of the City Council and their Ordinance Committee, and created a budget for a staffperson located in the Health Department. Orlando Henderson is at work, and those present from the newly sworn in group will soon begin their review of problems, issues, and concerns facing renters in Bridgeport. That is progress.

    But, contrary to RT reporting above this is the FAIR RENT Commission. The FAIR HOUSING Commission is still high and dry on the beach looking for Mayoral or City Council attention to breathe new life through appointment of qualified and motivated citizens, with diversity, experience, and judgement to assist residents in the development of personal and family transitions from renting, to owning or whatever the American family dream may be. Fair Housing is neither alive nor operating. And tenant associations/unions in Bridgeport buildings are not common. As a practical way for residents, many years beyond public school civics courses, they are an exercise in self-government to listen to the words of neighbors and to combine voices to gain attention to concerns. Grass-root American democracy I believe and support. Anyone opposed? Time will tell.

    3+
    1. Fair enough, Touche John. 🙂

      However Fair Rent, and Fair Housing sound like bureaucracy at its best. 🙂

      From a governmental standpoint, you would think the quality of housing, Fair Housing is a more important agenda to resurrect for election officials and advocates of the Fari Rent.

      Are we saying as long as the rent is fair we don’t care about you and the living conditions?

      How about the Port create a fair grocery commision too? 🤣

      Trix’s are for kids.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iadOkVt3kmU

      0
  5. CAPONE,
    Yes, it is an election year, with a historic ‘do-over’ cycle forced on the City voters by a Court decision sought by one party. But the public does not see an end to this ‘blame game’ or for genuine consequences for the well-schooled and paid political activists who practiced ‘ election cycle corruption’ for years.
    Ganim2 has served the past eight years, in a second cycle as Mayor, but he failed to understand the responsibility he had to appoint enough qualified folks to each Board and Commission regularly, in routine fashion, before meeting quorums, and meetings, minutes, dealing with public business, became impossible. In two cases FAIR Rent Commission and FAIR Housing Commission the actual groups actually ceased operating. They died in plain sight. Governance responsibility abjectly missed. Did Ganim2 care??

    He used more than one political appointee in recent years to assist the process but they paid no attention to the ‘FAIR commissions’. Does that mean the other Boards and Commissions are “unfair”, or merely the Mayor’s office for not paying heed? Actually, since you mention it, I am aware that the activity in the past 12 months came from the City Council. What part did Ganim2 play? Is the presence of Tom Gaudett at a meeting or an attorney from the City Attorney Office participating the evidence you are citing? When will FAIR Housing get re-launched, re-established, resurrected, or brought to life? Time will tell.

    2+

Leave a Reply