Walker Responds To Criticism From Greenwich Democratic Leader

David Walker
David Walker

Bill Gaston, vice chairman of the Greenwich Democratic Town Committee, attacked Bridgeport resident David Walker, former U.S. comptroller general, in a Hearst Newspapers commentary, writing: It may seem like ancient history now, but it was the drumbeat of alarmist prognostications from the likes of Mr. Walker, CEO of CAI, and the duo of Simpson-Bowles that led Congressmen from both sides of the aisle to warn their constituents that our economy was going to hell in a handbasket unless the debt and deficit dragons were slain. To put our house in order, Mr. Walker and his confreres had their sacrificial lambs all lined up: repealing the Affordable Care Act, block-granting Medicaid, raising taxes on Americans just above the poverty line, and further means-testing entitlements.

Gaston had prefaced his commentary with …

Ending with a faint whimper rather than a bang, the Comeback America Initiative (CAI), founded by former U.S. Comptroller General David Walker and dedicated to getting America’s fiscal house in order, abruptly closed up shop Sept. 20. In an e-mail to his followers, Mr. Walker said his organization was discontinuing operations so he could “spend some time with my family and consider future options.”

What happened to CAI?

Full commentary here.

Walker issued this response:

Ignorance and apathy are a toxic mix and Mr. Gaston obviously suffers from both. He is ignorant about why the Comeback America Initiative (CAI) discontinued operations and the impact that it had. As I stated in the announcement that Mr. Gaston referred to, I made a commitment to my wife 15 years ago to try achieve a better balance between work and family and to dramatically reduce my travel by October 2013.

I kept my promise to my wife and CAI’s Board and people who know me well were aware of my plans to do so several years ago. In addition, CAI demonstrated in its unprecedented “$10 Million a Minute” national fiscal responsibility bus tour in 2012 that at least 77 percent of a representative group of voters would support the type of sensible, nonpartisan and non-ideological reforms that are included on CAI’s web site at www.keepingamericagreat.org.  CAI’s and my prior efforts over the past 10 years have also resulted in a tripling of public concern over America’s structural deficits and dysfunctional government. Mr. Gaston is also ignorant of CBO’s and GAO’s long-range fiscal projections. Both nonpartisan agencies have warned that, despite a reduction in short-term deficits, the U.S. is still on an imprudent and unsustainable fiscal path. Restoring fiscal sanity will require social insurance reforms, rationalizing health care promises and reducing related cost growth, and achieving comprehensive tax reform.

As many economists of different political stripes have agreed, we need a plan that will reduce public debt/GDP to 60 percent within 10-15 years and be on a path to keep it there over time absent a declared war or depression. The truth is, Mr. Gaston is not an expert on the subject of his piece. In addition, by his title his is clearly a highly partisan person. The “bottom line” is that people like Mr. Gaston represent politics as usual and are part of the problem rather than solution. If people want to get the facts and make up their own mind, they should check out CAI’s web site.

0
Share

8 comments

  1. A Greenwich Democrat … not quite an oxymoron, I guess … who practiced law for a time, but then found the calling of real estate sales in Greenwich to be a better use of his time … and is a writer also, using a blog to exercise his talents?
    I missed seeing his economic background or education (perhaps he has a serious trust fund?) that would have him pulling the trigger on David Walker’s understanding and repeated warnings about Federal, State and local finances in the past three years.
    I will guess the outlook from Greenwich Ave or Stanwich Road may continue or maintain his exuberance for a while yet. Were he to relocate his professional real estate sales to Main Street Bridgeport he might have a less dismissive attitude of Walker. Oh well, let him eat cake, for as long as he is able. Time will tell.

    0
  2. Sounds like a personal spit, JML. No harm.

    But I agree with you, if the guy wants to play here he should get a Main Street office. Why not make it more challenging and have it on Grand Street?

    I always thought it was fun for Greenwich pols–R or D–to wax wise on Bridgeport politics. They usually left a little wane. The only guy from Greenwich 20+ years ago who kinda understood was Weicker. Whatever else, Weicker was enthusiastic about the brawling aspects of Bridgeport politics that used to make so many other out-of-towners look like wusses.

    What was Foley like in town?

    0
    1. Yeah, and Weicker gave Connecticut its income tax and refused to bring in a casino into Bridgeport’s harbor. That chased away both Steve Wynn and Donald Trump. If you want to talk about an economic boost to Bridgeport, that was it. It would have revived the harbor and downtown in one swoop. But the bully known as Weicker knew better than successful businessmen and Bridgeport is where it is for the last 40+ years.

      0
  3. I don’t blog as often as I’m tempted to, but I can’t resist thanking my long-time friend Carmen Lopez for staying the course. Every time I think about the night I proudly nominated her for a seat on the Board of Education, and her nomination fell short of the necessary votes, I question the ability of the Bridgeport Town Committee to make sound decisions when fulfilling their role to nominate qualified candidates to elected office. I’m a member of the TC representing the 132nd district, and it frustrates me to sit through these sessions watching the “rubber stamp” process at its best. Thank you Carmen, please keep up your good work.

    0
  4. Bob, Mario Testa had nothing to do with matters of the 132nd TC. Never has and never will as long as I’m a member. Mario is aware of this and to my knowledge he has never attempted to intervene in any decisions. Ours was a district matter, and while there was a change in membership in recent years, those decisions were made by the sitting members and no one else. You are one of the most intelligent, knowledgeable and independent persons I know. It was a political decision.

    0
    1. Lisa, the excuse you gave was I missed too many meetings. But in fact I only missed one and gave my proxy to vote to another member. You in fact had missed a few meetings without having anyone vote your proxy. Sorry, but this is one of the few things that still sticks in my craw.

      0

Leave a Reply