How’s Your TAN? Plus: Zoning Code

The following item is expected to be acted on by the City Council’s Budget and Appropriations Committee Monday night:

Communication from Finance Department re Approval of General Obligation Tax Anticipation Notes – To Pay Current Expenses and Obligations of the City, referred to Budget and Appropriations Committee.

What does this mean? If the City Council does not approve this within a couple of weeks, the city will not be able to pay its bills come July 1. It will be out of money. Tax anticipation notes–a short-term loan paid off by tax revenue–are not uncommon, but this illustrates the city’s fragile financial position during these times and in particular evaporation of the city’s fund balance so essential for positive financial standing from Wall Street bond rating agencies.

The city’s Finance Department is asking the City Council’s budget committee to approve $55 million in TANs to bolster the city’s revenue flow. Assuming the budget committee signs off, the request will go to the full council for a vote May 18. When the city’s fund balance was strong, upwards of $50 million 10 years ago, the city could rely on that to cover a short-term financial squeeze and then replenish the fund.

Not any more. The fund balance is down to $10 million or so. As a result, short-term borrowing becomes a necessary toothache. Interest, legal fees and other associated charges will cost the city hundreds of thousands of dollars depending on the amount borrowed.

The budget committee that has been busy going through Mayor Bill Finch’s proposed budget for the budget year that begins July 1 will meet Monday to act on the Finance Department request before the full council votes on Finch’s budget, according to budget co-chair Bob Curwen. The budget committee will vote on Finch’s spending plan within the next couple of days.

Will a business tax surcharge be included? Some on the committee support it, some don’t. How about councilman Andre Baker’s jihad to wipe out the Chief Administrative Office? I don’t see that happening. Curwen told OIB he doesn’t think the city needs a media relations position that costs nearly $100k with benefits.

Damn, just when I was thinking about getting my old job back. (Don’t worry, the electorate is safe.)

Hey, it looks like the Connecticut Legislature is going to authorize cities and towns to delay implementation of revaluation. That’s good news for some chief elected officials concerned about the fallout of a residential tax hit. Finch, however, will not put off reval. The city’s revaluation that kicks in July 1 is a mixed  bag of tax increases and decreases, with perhaps 50 percent or so homeowners staying the same, as a result of a reval shift to the business sector. Finch does not want to mess with that.

In The Zone

The city’s zoning rewrite has a number of OIB friends upset for the lack of public hearing. See news release from Mayor Finch below:

Mayor Finch Asks P&Z to Have Additional Public Hearing on Re-Write of Zoning Code

Mayor Bill Finch today asked the city’s Planning and Zoning Commission to have one more public hearing about rewriting Bridgeport’s zoning code – the regulations that govern where different types of buildings can be located in the city. Finch stated, “While an additional hearing is not required by law, I believe it is good public policy to hold one more public hearing on this important issue.”

“The process of rewriting the zoning code has been a very long, expensive and careful process and I commend the commission for its efforts,” said Mayor Finch. “Nevertheless, we need to make sure that all interested members of the public are heard.”

The Mayor explained that the proposed new zoning regulations were made available for public comment last July 28. Since then, the Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing on Nov. 10. Consequently, 29 different comments were made at the public hearing, while another 161 separate comments were made in letters sent to the commission. Commission staff contributed another 143 comments, resulting in the total of 333 comments on the proposed new zoning regulations. However, there are indications that there are members of the public who would still like to add to the comments.

“I am eager to have the new Zoning Code adopted as soon as possible,” said Mayor Finch. “However, providing another opportunity for the public to weigh in would not significantly delay the process.”

News release from Jim Himes

Himes Announces Seniors, Veterans Begin Receiving $250 Recovery Checks This Week

Over $137 million to boost Connecticut Economy

WASHINGTON, DC-Congressman Jim Himes announced that starting Thursday Social Security and Supplemental Security Income beneficiaries in Connecticut will begin receiving $250 checks to supplement their regular benefits. The one-time payments are part of the Recovery Act passed by Congress and earlier this year and will directly help over 550,000 Connecticut residents.

“When we passed the Recovery Act, we wanted to get money back into the economy as quickly as possible,” said Congressman Himes. “This one-time payment to seniors, disabled veterans, and SSI recipients stimulates our economy by putting money in the pockets of those who need it most.”

Social Security will begin disbursement of the payments this week and continue throughout May. Later this month, similar $250 payments will be sent to Railroad Retirement Board beneficiaries, followed by Veteran Compensation and Pension beneficiaries in June. Altogether, Connecticut residents will receive 137,697,000.

Eligible individuals will receive their $250 checks automatically. No action is needed to apply. To receive the payments, individuals needed to be eligible for benefits during November 2008, December 2008 or January 2009.

Those who have not received their payment by June 4 should contact the Social Security Administration at 1-800-772-1213. For more information, go to: www.socialsecurity.gov/payment/

0
Share

15 comments

  1. Oh to be a fly on the wall during those budget committee meetings. I can just imagine the political tug of war.

    Regarding the mayor’s staff, let’s be fair; he does need a press person. But does he really need Ruben, Chris AND Tyrone? What do they do all day except run around the office bumping into each other? I think 1 of those positions could definitely be eliminated.

    You know my opinion on OPM, CAO’s Office and CitiStat. Don’t need to repeat that.

    What about Public Facilities? Baker wants to cut one of the deputy directors. Also take a look at all the acting foremen. What’s that about? PF used to run with two foreman, why do we have 8 – 10 now? Too many chiefs and not enough indians.

    And someone PLEASE look at the OPM staff. You have a person in charge of writing performance measures for depts and making over $70k. Is this necessary? And why is Pia still there? She retired several years ago and Tom hired her back as a double-dipper. What’s her function? And how did Tom create another budget analyst position for Gisella without City Council approval? Is he above the law that he can just create positions at whim to protect political relatives?

    0
    1. CHS … I usually agree with everything you post, but in this case I spend a lot of time in the mayor’s office and the gentlemen you mentioned are hard workers who do not make the big bucks and keep that office and in all reality the city running … file under agree to disagree?

      0
  2. Mayor Finch has the unfortunate happenstance of presiding over a city whose finances were depleted by previous administrations. He’s done everything possible to reduce costs oftentimes at the expense of his own agenda. Tax Anticipation Notes produce money but they increase expenses, too. It’s extreme short-sightedness.

    I wish The Mayor the best in what has become one of the toughest jobs in America because what’s good for the mayor is good for Bridgeport.

    *********************************************
    ci.bridgeport.ct.us/_img/_uploaded/line1.jpg < -- this photo was taken by someone at City Hall.

    0
  3. Interesting note from last nights Planning & Zoning meeting. Jose Tiago was at the meeting sitting in the back alongside Greg Conte. While not sworn in yet this appears to be a direct slap in the face to the Bridgeport Citizens and those that opposed this appointment.

    0
  4. Back again, the phone does not stop ringing about these zoning issues. The latest: When Gail Solis was put on the board one stipulation was that she would recuse herself when a conflict happened. Why hasn’t she recused herself when BRBC members Rizzio, Willinger or Quatrella appear before the P&Z? As the head of the Chamber of Commerce she should recuse herself. To date she has not recused herself from hearing any petitions before the P&Z.
    How does Tiago vote when a large local developer has a petition before the board? This developer and Tiago have been seen having diner together at the Épernay Bistro on several occasions.
    Now with a full board it will be interesting to see who will be elected Chairmen (women) of this board when elections are held in a few months. Any guesses?

    0
  5. Take the Tan and get Burned.

    Finch is not forthright in his claim that the public had time to comment on rewrite. Several properties were thrown in at the last minute without any public comment. Look at the ownership of these properties and follow the campaign money trail and you will see this was an insider trading deal.

    0
  6. As to SB 997, it did pass the Senate as Lennie stated. There were three no votes, Mckinney, Debicella, Boucher. However, a “strike all” amendment was offered by Williams, Looney that provided for the option of regional revaluations. I won’t take your time up here but anyone who is interested in the full text and analysis of the bill can find it here: www .cga.ct.gov/asp/cgabillstatus/cgabillstatus.asp?selBillType=Bill&bill_num=SB00997
    The bill was immediately transferred to the House for a vote.
    It was nice to see the smiling faces of Senator Gomes and Anthony Musto and I saw a representative of Bridgeport’s new lobbying firm as well. Honestly though, if you’re lobbying for money you might as well be looking for the proverbial needle in a haystack. The Gov. still hasn’t finalized her budget plans and education money may still be in danger. While boards of education may get federal stimulus money directly, the Gov. may still cut ECS money by the corresponding amount. While this year may be okay, next year is another story. As far as I know we only get the federal money once.

    0
  7. Local Eyes,
    The problem with last year’s budget was that it included make-believe revenue to the tune of $16 million dollars. The same person who put that money in the budget is approving more make-believe revenue for this year.
    Only in Bridgeport could the mayor believe that two wrongs like this can make a right. In order to make good for last year’s mistakes you need to come up with new ones for this year.

    0
    1. *** Really, who cares where wayward dogs lay! Also, ’til I get the I.D. as “fact” rather than just “rumor”; I will not be disclosing C.H.S. & company’s true identity yet, nor anytime this coming weekend. ***

      0
    2. Got a great tan. 12 days of unbelievable sunshine on an exquisite beach in 90 degree weather. Then I come back to Bridgeport and the clouds and rain. Finch … I blame you for this.

      Oh … BTW … Finch is doing a credible job in painful cost cutting. But the putz has done nothing, ***absolutely nothing*** to bring new sustainable revenue into the city.
      Cost-cutting is easy. Real revenue production takes skill. He doesn’t have it.

      0
  8. Tommy Mac is a busy man. In addition to a full-time Deputy Director of Labor Relations and a full-time City Council Prez, he has now apparently become a member of the working clergy with the mayor’s blessing. In a Finch press release, the Ruben “Scoop” Felipe reports that among those participating in the national day of prayer event were:
    • Rev. Dr. C.L. Stallworth of East End Baptist Church
    • Bishop T. Walter Plummer of the Full Gospel Church of God and Christ
    • City Council President Thomas C. McCarthy
    • Rev. Simon Castillio and Marilus Velez of Good Shepherd Christian Church
    • Rabbi Israel Stein of Congregation Rodolph Shalom Temple
    • Imam Nasif Muhammad of Al-Aziz Islamic Center
    • Rev. David B. Smith of Pivot Ministries
    • Rev. Lourdes Quinones of Iglesia Cristiana Renacer, Inc.
    • Rev. Michael Hawkins of Greater Christian Fellowship Church, and
    • Father Francesco Carraro, Parochial Vicar of St. Raphael Parish.

    0

Leave a Reply