Log in Register

 

 Thursday May 24, 2018

Curtis Ryan Honda Resilient Bridgeport Housatonic Community College

 HCA Reg. Num. HCA.0000908

Ultimate Family Care

 $350 Referral Fee!
 Call Us!



The Barnum Museum Elle Sera
Downtown Cabaret TheatreOIB the bookBridgeport Public Library

Trump Budget Cuts Gut Social Services Organizations

March 28th, 2017 · 7 Comments · Analysis and Comment, Development and Zoning, News and Events

Ralphola Taylor Center

Ralphola Taylor Center.

Battle lines are forming as President Donald Trump seeks to cut organizations that rely on federal assistance. Federal dollars that go to states redirected to city social service, housing and infrastructure programs are in jeopardy under Trump’s proposed spending cuts. Trump says the programs don’t show results. What’s at stake for Bridgeport? Job training, home ownership programs, veteran services, Meals on Wheels food program for elderly and disabled, home heating assistance, homeless shelters and more.

Many of these programs are funded under the federal Community Development Block Grant Program enacted in 1974 to stimulate low-income urban areas. It started under a Republican presidential administration whose banner Trump now carries.

According to CDBG Program description, see here, Bridgeport is scheduled to receive roughly $2.7 million for the budget year starting July 1. The program is administered through the city’s Central Grants Office.

Many of the beneficiaries are community safety nets such as the YMCA-backed Ralphola Taylor Center in the East End whose programs are tangible. The funding often supplements social service organizations vying for every possible dollar to keep programs in place.

In the weeks to come, look for community activists, city officials and federal elected representatives to weigh in on this issue. The federal dollars are also key perks for elected officials to curry favor with various constituencies. This is not Bridgeport specific. Cities all across America face the same cuts.

Voters Trump promised to help are actually hurt by his proposal including low-income black, white and brown constituencies in states such as Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin that swung the election his way.

Some of the programs eligible for CDBG funds:

- Housing services in connection with Home Investment Partnerships (“HOME”) Program activities;

- Construction of housing assisted under Section 17 of the U.S. Housing Act of 1937 (§570.201(m)) or construction of housing by eligible CBDOs (§570.204(a)) or as a last resort housing under §570.207(b)(3)(i);

- Homeownership assistance (such as down-payment assistance and interest subsidies) (§570.201(n) or §570.201(e));

- Rehabilitation to buildings which are residential, low-income rental or homeowner housing

This also includes conversion of non-residential structures for residential use. The following types of rehabilitation activities may be undertaken:

- Acquisition for rehabilitation and rehabilitation for residential purposes;
- Labor, materials, etc., for rehabilitation of properties;
- Loans for refinancing existing secured indebtedness;
- Energy improvements;
- Water efficiency improvements;
- Connection to water and sewer lines;
- Some homeowner warranty, hazard and flood insurance premiums;
- Testing for and abatement of lead-based paint;
- Cost of acquiring tools to be lent for rehabilitation;
- Rehabilitation services.

Other Real Property Activities

In addition to the housing-related activities, many other real property activities are eligible to be funded by CDBG such as:

- Acquisition (§570.201(a) and Disposition
- Clearance and demolition
- Rehabilitation of publicly- or privately-owned commercial or industrial buildings
- Historic preservation
- Renovation of closed buildings

Public Facilities Eligible Activities
CDBG funds may be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, or installation of public improvements or public facilities §570.201(c):
- “Public improvements” include, but are not limited to, streets, sidewalks, water and sewer lines, and parks.
- “Public facilities” include, but are not limited to, neighborhood/community facilities and facilities for persons with special needs (e.g. homeless shelters, group homes, and halfway houses).

Public Services Eligible Activities
Public services are also generally eligible under the CDBG Program (§570.201(e)). These public service activities may include, but are not limited to:
- Job training and employment services;
- Health care and substance abuse services;
- Child care;
- Crime prevention;
- Fair Housing counseling; and
- Activities for seniors;

Economic Development Eligible Activities
CDBG recipients may also provide grants or loans to community-based development organizations ““CBDOs”) to carry out the following types of projects (§570.204):
- Neighborhood revitalization;
- Community economic development; and
- Energy conservation.

Share

Tags:

7 Comments so far ↓

  • Lisa Parziale

    While I am concerned with Trump’s proposal to cut social service activities (let’s hope he loses this one also), going over the above list I would guess the money Bridgeport does receive is covering, or shall I say, touching, maybe 20% of the services listed. The rest have been neglected for years, and some never came into existence; they sounded good when applying for grants. If memory serves me, relatively speaking, administrations dipped into a portion of the grant for patronage positions, once the money was disbursed, it was so easy to hide irrelevant jobs.

  • Steven Auerbach

    Add Sanctuary City status to the city and we will be rolling in the dough! How much money will Trumbull, Fairfield, Southport, Shelton and Stratford have to give up? Isn’t it absolutely outrageous that the marginalized in society have to suffer the most? Now which is more important, the federal cuts, the possibility of losing more funding if we have Sanctuary city status or the fight for Sanctuary city status? It is always the same people, now what will you do??? We are a welfare city as it is. We have to fight for every dollar. If Trump is not impeached soon we will have eight years of cuts. We have many people including Democrats who voted for him. I still cannot wrap my head around this and I do not think I ever will.

  • Andrew C Fardy

    Steve, we don’t need to become an official sanctuary city. We don’t need to hide lawbreaking illegal aliens. If they are convicted in court here they should be deported after they serve their sentence. Do you want to tell the families of citizens who suffer at the hands of these illegals that they need to be free and it’s too bad you had to suffer?

  • Andrew C Fardy

    I am for most of the cuts except meals on wheels and veteran help. The rest may just have to get off their asses and get a job.

  • Steven Auerbach

    Andy, I do not believe illegal aliens commit crimes at a higher rate than home-grown animals. That is not my argument. I do not want to see families separated, that does not give me joy. My point is simple. We are a broken city. A failing school system. Our police and fireman are understaffed and our city services are already overworked. I am concerned that this President, whom I have no respect for, will cut funding to cities with Sanctuary status. I believe what this idiot says. We are a welfare city. We need all the money we can get and we have little to spare. That’s my point. I do not want people to be punished because they came here for a better life. We are a nation of immigrants. We need to speed up the process and address the obvious.

    Any cut to the city’s social services is totally unacceptable.

    • Andrew C Fardy

      Steve, for argument’s sake. How do we know the fire department and the police department are understaffed? When was the last time either department was professionally surveyed? Do you think it’s time to do something about generation after generation of families on welfare?
      Do you think alien criminals should be punished? If you are worried about breaking up families then send them back with their criminal relative. If the criminal does not care, why should we?

  • Steven Auerbach

    I think criminals should be punished. I am worried about families being torn apart.

    I do not think Trump, you or I have the ability to do anything about generations of welfare. Education is always the ticket. Bridgeport does not score high marks there. I think mandatory service in the military would be one way to benefit from illegal entry into our country.

Leave a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.