Newt, Romney, Santorum, Paul On State GOP Primary Ballot

The Republican presidential primary has taken more twists and turns than Old Town Road. Mitt Romney’s been up and down so many times who could blame him for suffering from the shakes. Romney’s up, then Newt Gingrich, then Romney again and now Rick Santorum surges into contention. So this thing is going to play out for a while. Connecticut Secretary of the State Denise Merrill today selected Gingrich, Romney, Santorum and Ron Paul to appear on the April 24 GOP presidential primary ballot. Connecticut has a closed primary process but new voters and independents can join the GOP ranks and vote in the primary up to one day before the big day. For details see Merrill’s news release below:

Secretary Merrill Selects Presidential Candidates for April 24th Primary Ballot

Four Republican Candidates and President Obama Qualify for the Ballot, Other Candidates Can Begin to Collect Primary Petitions

Hartford: Secretary of the State Denise Merrill today joined Connecticut Republican Party Chairman Jerry Labriola for a news conference at the State Capitol to announce the names of the presidential candidates who have qualified for the ballot in Connecticut’s presidential preference primary on April 24, 2012. Today also marks the first day that primary petitions become available for presidential candidates not selected for the ballot by Secretary Merrill, pursuant to her statutory authority under Connecticut General Statutes 9-465.

“We are getting closer to a very exciting decision for Connecticut voters–who do they want to run for President for the Republican and Democratic nomination,” said Secretary Merrill, Connecticut’s chief elections official. “Voters will have an important choice to make when they go to the polls in April so I encourage all voters to start educating themselves about the candidates now.”

“The Republican presidential primary campaign continues to be a wide open, extremely competitive race and that means a lot will be at stake on primary day in Connecticut,” State GOP Chair Jerry Labriola said. “This is a great opportunity for our geographically small state to be a big player on the national stage and I want to encourage voters to get out and vote, go out and get registered, and make your voices heard. I look forward to the Republican National Convention in August when I will lead an energetic and excited delegation that will nominate the 2012 Republican candidate for President.”

The following Republican candidates will have their names on the ballot (order will be randomly selected in March):

• Newt Gingrich; Mitt Romney; Rick Santorum; Ron Paul;

President Barack Obama’s name was also selected as qualifying for the April 24th ballot, though there will not be a Democratic Presidential Preference Primary in Connecticut if no other candidates qualify for the ballot through the petition process.

Following today’s selection, Secretary Merrill will promptly notify each candidate by registered mail that his or her name will appear on the ballot. According to Connecticut General statutes 9-465, “A candidate’s name may be placed on a party’s primary ballot in one of two alternative ways:

(1) by the Secretary of the State, if in the Secretary’s opinion the person’s candidacy for the party’s presidential nomination is generally and seriously advocated or recognized according to reports in the national or state news media;

OR

(2) by petition signed by at least one per cent of the enrolled members of the party in the state according to the most recent active-list enrollment records on file in this office.”

The minimum signature requirement will be calculated from enrollment figures to be compiled as of November 8, 2011. (Estimated using the October 26, 2010 enrollment compilation, the approximate requirements would be 7,500 Democrats or 4,100 Republicans.) Petitions become available today, Friday Feb. 10th at noon, and must be submitted to local Registrars of Voters by March 2, 2012.

Of note: The presidential primary does not directly select actual delegates to the national party conventions. Rather, it determines the number of delegate positions allocated to each Presidential candidate, statewide and/or by Congressional District as the case may be. This apportionment of delegate seats “won” is done according to the applicable “proportional representation” formula, if any, prescribed by national party rules; or on a “winner takes all” basis if so authorized by such rules; or by the formula specified in the state law if the party rules provide neither a formula nor a winner-takes-all requirement.

The Secretary of the State tabulates the primary returns, calculates the allocation of delegate positions to candidates, and certifies the results to the national and state parties and to the candidates. The procedure for actual selection of the delegates is governed by the rules of each party—provided that the party must select and certify the correct number of delegates committed to each candidate as so determined.

Important dates in run-up to the primary:

• Tuesday, March 20, 2012 Secretary Merrill will determine the order of all candidates on the ballot by randomly drawing their names in a public ceremony.

• Thursday, April 19, 2012 is the mail-in deadline for new voters, and for unaffiliated voters, to enroll in a party for voting in its primary. For new voters, mail-in applications must be postmarked, or received by Registrar of Voters or voter registration agency, by this date. For unaffiliated voters, the mail-in application must be received (not merely postmarked) by the Registrar of Voters by this deadline.

• Monday, April 23, 2012 at noon is the in-person deadline for new and unaffiliated voters to register in a party for voting in the primary.

Polls will be open for Connecticut voters registered with a major party from 6:00 a.m. until 8:00 p.m. for the Presidential Preference primary. Connecticut will be part of a regional primary, as voters in New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and Delaware will also be heading to the polls that day. The complete calendar for the primary is attached and can be found online at www.sots.ct.gov.

0
Share

34 comments

  1. Not necessarily so, Grin. What the GOP really needs is a brokered convention. If none of the four remaining candidates achieve the necessary 50% of the delegates then there will be an open convention. The key here is to defeat this empty suit of a president. Obama took over from the likes of “W” and has been unable to correct “W”‘s mistakes. Not only that, but he has made the U.S. into a weaker nation on several fronts, not the least is the economic morass we are now experiencing.
    A brokered convention would put the likes of Mitch Daniels and Chris Christie into the forefront. Either one would make a better president than any of the four current candidates, and a far better president than we have now.
    I’m a fiscally conservative and socially moderate Democrat who’s watched the shenanigans of both parties for over 48 years.
    We need term limits and accountability at all levels of government.

    0
    1. I’m glad you think this is funny. I don’t. This is an important election and we need someone who represents everyone and knows how to lead. McCain’s mistake was he was forced into taking Palin as his running mate. And he would have let GM declare bankruptcy to reorganize.
      At least McCain had a substantial resume. Obama’s MO was to run for the next higher office as soon as he was elected. And that occurred at all levels. No substantive legislation, no leadership skills, Chicago corrupt politics, including unrepentant far-left types, shall I go on?
      Sadly there is no one of substance in either party.

      0
  2. Bob, let’s try this again. Bob, what was President John McCain’s plan to solve these problems? Who was it who forced McCain’s mistake into taking Palin as his running mate?

    As for Mitch Daniels and Chris Christie, they have already shown they don’t have the courage of their convictions to run for president or have the leadership to lead by NOT getting in the race in the first place.

    0
    1. Ron, all your comments speak not of the failings of this president. In 1945 FDR was vilified for not having Henry Wallace as his VP. Instead he chose Harry Truman, a one-term senator from Missouri, a known “border state,” a man who used the “N” word. FDR knew he was dying, but chose Truman for his forthright character and leadership. History proved FDR correct as Truman led the US into the “modern era” … He ended WWII with two bombs, he desegregated the military, he stemmed the incursion of foreign powers (i.e. the USSR) into their form of colonialism, he helped regulate the banking industry and limited unions from becoming management.
      As for Mitch Daniels, he didn’t participate because he didn’t want his family dragged into the fray as he and his wife had separated and reunited a couple of times during their marriage. However he balanced Indiana’s budget, leaving a surplus and he took apart Pres. Obama’s state of the union speech in the GOP rebuttal. I hadn’t heard of him before this happened.
      Chris Christie just tells it as it is. No BS, just head-on discussion. And NJ seems to be doing a lot better so far.
      You don’t seem to see Pres. Obama’s short resume, nor do you seem willing to discuss it. While I’m thrilled to see a man of color as our leader, I’m disappointed as he wasn’t the one I thought it would be. Obama makes a very good appearance, has an enviable graduate and post-graduate education, has risen sharply from community organizer to President of the United States. However, and to my observation, he has no substance to his record as state legislator, state senator, congressman, senator or President.

      0
  3. Bob, being President is NOT about who has the best resume, otherwise George Walker Bush should have beaten Bill “Bubba” Clinton because no one could match his resume. Chris Christie is just another get-in-your-face loudmouth just like President Rudy Giuliani or Donald “Birther” Trump. It seems Republicans are much more concerned about getting in Obama’s face than solving problems. Well, bring it on.

    0
  4. I’m saddened, Ron, by your lack of concern over the good and welfare of this experiment called the United States.
    I don’t deny the lack of quality in the GOP system, but I don’t see anything of substance coming out of the Democrats either.
    “Bring it on?” How sophomoric!!! This isn’t a boxing match or a football game. It’s our future, yours, mine, and our children.
    Don’t you understand President Obama (and please note, I recognize the man’s title) has no solution(s) to the divisiveness, poor economic conditions, and the US’s faltering leadership position in the world? It’s not just him. It’s a failed Congress as well. We need term limits and accountability, not the second-rate flies and leeches who call themselves our government.
    They say “All politics is local.” Well look what we have here in Bridgeport and in Hartford. They say 2% of all politicians give the rest a good name.

    0
    1. Bob, “Bring it on?” How sophomoric!!! This isn’t a boxing match or a football game. It’s our future, yours, mine, and our children. Bob, have you been watching the 20 Republican debates? The Republican candidates have been “sophomoric” with their comments and they have been acting like children.

      Bob, tell me which candidate is telling the truth about the other candidates. Is Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum telling the truth about Mitt Romney or is Mitt Romney telling the truth about Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum? And tell me, what are their solutions for the issues you said Obama is not dealing with? Oh, I know, more tax cuts for the rich.

      0
      1. Ron, I don’t think you get it. It would be a fair tax structure for everyone. It would be a pro-business environment. It would be a secure environment. It would be an equitable system socially. Don’t just support Obama because he’s a man of color or a Democrat. Be open minded about what is good for all Americans. Listen to what IS said and not to the hate that is out there. I’m sure you’re a bright enough individual to do this.
        I was responding to your comments as being sophomoric and you respond as if I’m attacking the Democrats. Your comments just show a lack of openmindedness.

        0
  5. *** It’s a GOP lineup so Republican voters can hopefully pick the right person, no? *** Step and face forward, now turn and face left, okay now turn around to your right, alright you can step back in line there number one; NEXT! ***

    0
  6. Bob, you are losing focus, I never mentioned the word color or race at any time. Openmindedness, oh yes, that’s what Mitt, Newt, Rich and Ron are talking about, openmindedness. Bob, just take the time and listen to what they are saying. Once again, who is telling the truth about the other candidates, Mitt or Newt and Rich?

    0
  7. Bob,
    The Republicans had their chance with Bush and they turned the economy into a DISASTER. The worst economic climate since the great depression and you are blaming Obama for not having it fixed and totally back on track in two years?
    And I am saying two years because once the Republicans took over congress a year ago their sole mission was to PREVENT Obama from succeeding.

    0
  8. A pro-business climate??? You have got to be kidding me.
    Remove all restrictions and let business do what they want and they ship more jobs overseas, make dumb short-term business decisions because it isn’t even about the bottom line anymore, it’s about Wall Street’s expectations on Earnings Per diluted share (lose less money than everyone expected and your stock goes up) and pad their incentive bonuses.

    0
  9. And that is the type of business background Mitt brings to the table. He was never involved with a business long enough to establish a history.
    Go in. Eliminate jobs. Make the business look better on paper. Get out. Reap obscene profits.
    Yes, we need a president who brings that kind of a background to turn the economy around.

    0
  10. Maybe after Bush and the Republicans find those WMDs and they find out what they did with the surplus President Clinton left after he got out of office then maybe we can start to solve some of America’s problems.

    0
  11. Bob,
    The truth is the economy is recovering just fine. In spite of everything the Republicans have done to tank it and blame Obama.
    Jobless Rate Falls to 8.3%
    The Labor Department reported on Friday that the unemployment rate had fallen all the way back to the level of President Obama’s first full month in office
    Over the last year, the economy has added almost two million jobs for the best 12 months in five years.
    Stocks surged, with the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index closing only slightly below its high since Mr. Obama took office.

    The Republicans are desperately avoiding this good news and hammering away on doom and gloom. Obama has tried to give the economy another jump to accelerate the recovery underway and the Republicans fight to maintain tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans

    0
    1. Grin,
      No comment from me on party politics, local, state or Federal! Look at governmental action by those in power!!!
      Let’s look at the dollars being pumped out by the Federal Reserve system. They have to go somewhere. As they enter the banking system, fixed dollar returns (savings, CDs, money-market funds and even Treasury paper) are historically low, bond returns are not much better and the stock market returns are perhaps overvalued by most historical standards, though it’s fun to think you are a smart investor at this moment. Real estate values are as low as they are going to get? Says who? Commodities? Precious metals? The government is involved and that is far more than financial history’s “invisible hand” describing real-world market activity producing efficiency. Watch the behind-the-scene behavior that is not reported in an open, accountable and transparent manner! Time will tell.

      0
  12. Tell the underemployed at Wal-Mart the economy is improving …
    Tell the taxpayers about the Solyndra embarrassment. Green technology is not strong enough to be profitable and we need to get off foreign oil. We have 200 year’s worth of fossil fuel right here in the US. We need new and more efficient refineries (read: jobs). The tax breaks for the wealthiest should also be directed at all levels of the economic ladder. Read: flat tax.
    I acknowledge the WMD BS was about $ and Bush’s cronies.
    We haven’t had a stable economy since Bubba left office (stains and all).

    0
  13. Bob, the policies your Republican candidates are ALL talking about are the old Bush policies or worse. They bring nothing new to the table. They want to start more wars overseas, more tax breaks for the rich. No birth control, private businesses do not have to be loyal to America, they can keep sending American jobs overseas.

    0
    1. I agree. I said before what they need is a brokered convention as the current slate of candidates is terribly weak and quite divided.
      However, and I know you don’t agree, Obama has been as miserable a president on many levels as W. I believe he must go.

      0
  14. I knew someone would find a name for the Republican Presidential campaign for this year.
    Electile Dysfunction: The inability to become aroused over any of the candidates for election.

    0

Leave a Reply