Malloy To Rescue, State Budget Proposal Supports Two-Year Delay In Property Revaluation, Finch: ‘Especially Pleased’

Governor Dan Malloy’s budget proposal to the General Assembly on Thursday calls for up to a two-year delay on the implementation of property revaluation, good news for Mayor Bill Finch and city bean counters who were facing a massive hike in the city’s mil rate. Speaker of the House Brendan Sharkey has been cold to a reval delay, but it’s unlikely Malloy would have included the delay in his budget proposal without a signal from Sharkey he’ll support it. The proposed budget allows for a local option for all municipalities to delay.

The city’s putting on a push in this new state legislative session in a last-ditch effort to postpone reval through gubernatorial and legislative approval. A delay in reval will also extend into the mayor’s reelection cycle next year avoiding a major hike in the mil rate. Even with a delay in reval the mayor’s not looking at a pretty budget picture the next two years. Federal money that paid for 30 or so public safety officers under Barack Obama’s stimulus plan has run out, forcing the city to pick up that tab starting this year.

City officials want to delay reval for several reasons including anticipation of tax revenue for development projects such as the Steel Point redevelopment area coming on line. Some of the higher-taxed neighborhoods such as Black Rock and North End could absorb the reval blow. Implementing reval could also juice motor vehicles taxes, scare away businesses fearing a higher mil rate as well as put some fragile businesses over the edge. The city’s current mil rate is 41.855, among the highest in the state. Without a delay in reval the city was heading for the highest mil rate in the state.

Connecticut law requires all real estate to be revalued for assessment purposes every five years to bring about uniformity in property values and ensuring  everyone pays their fair share, or so it goes. Your property tax bill is a function of your assessment based on 70 percent of value. In this economy property values have sunk so as a general rule the mil rate approved by the City Council will spike to make up for the reduced assessments in order to fund the budget proposed by the mayor. A lot of this depends on the spending plan the mayor submits. Finch will now submit his proposed spending plan to the City Council the first week of April contingent upon a delay in reval.

Opponents to delaying reval, including the Connecticut Business & Industry Association, claim it’s poor public policy to put it off. The more frequently reval takes place, the organization maintains, the more accurate and fair tax assessments will be. Opponents also say delaying reval is nothing more than kicking the can down the road in an attempt to hide budget problems.

Malloy included these items in his budget proposal under the header Helping Cities And Towns.

Eliminate the Health Insurance Premium Tax on Municipalities – $8.7 million savings

Allow up to a two year delay on implementation of revaluation (local option)

$8 million increase in PILOT for Private Colleges and Hospitals

End the state charge to municipalities for DMV’s program to block registration of motor vehicles by people with delinquent taxes

$10 million for additional school security infrastructure grants

$10 million additional funding for Local Bridge Program, $50 million for Urban Act

New Advanced Manufacturing Fund provides assistance to companies locating in towns with traditional dependence on manufacturing 1,020 new pre-K slots

$40 million increase to ECS aid (per enacted budget)

See overview of governor’s budget here.

Statement from Mayor Bill Finch:

“I applaud Governor Malloy for recognizing the needs of the state’s cities in his 2014-15 budget proposal. It’s clear that he is aware of the challenges cities like Bridgeport face in the coming years as we try to balance budgets and grow our tax base so our residents are not always meant to feel the brunt of an unfair property tax structure. I am especially pleased that the Governor has included a measure that would allow for up to a two-year delay in implementation of revaluation in towns and cities across the state. Delaying the implementation of revaluation is critically important to Bridgeport because the City suffered a record number of foreclosures in the historic economic downturn of 2007-08. Governor Malloy also has honored his promise to increase education funding for the state’s largest city–the approximately $4 million boost to our ECS will enable us to provide better educational outcomes for our students.

“I want to thank the Governor for increasing funding levels to PILOTS for colleges and hospitals, and Mohegan/Pequot funds, and staying level on Local Capital Improvement Program funds and Town Aid Road grants. While these programs still fall a bit short of prior year’s funding levels, the proposals will enable us to continue to provide services and reinvigorate our infrastructure, while the economy struggles to bounce back.

“Additionally, I applaud Governor Malloy for his continued commitment to growing jobs in our state through innovative economic development strategies and programs to provide assistance to our small business owners and entrepreneurs.

“I am very proud of the Governor’s commitment to new investments in early childhood education, of which I am very supportive and focused on increasing the numbers of children who are able to access programs in Bridgeport, and expanding opportunities for college affordability so more students can realize their dream through higher education.

0
Share

22 comments

  1. Let’s stop playing revaluation games. When the market tanked they used the revaluation figures from when the market was at its peak, which forced many people into foreclosure. Now the prices are down and a revaluation could mean lower taxes, so they choose to extend it. It is just better to keep the timeline predictable. Same thing with taxes, taxes are not increased for years and then when they are the hit is much harder.

    0
  2. Lennie,
    Can you explain how Steel Point projects coming on line benefit from revaluation? It has been my impression upwards of 80-85% of the taxation in that are first to go to repay bonding and not to assist other City property owners. What am I missing?
    The mil rate likely increases because of the reality of actual decreased values in the contemporary property marketplace. How does that by itself scare new businesses away? If actual real estate values are lower in the City, that should attract new businesses, no?

    The real difficulty with a postponement is while the majority of City properties probably have a lower fair market value as of October 1, 2013 than on October 1, 2008, the lower values were not evenly distributed throughout the City. As an example if your residence had an assessed value of $300,000 originally that has been revalued at $200,000 your situation is different from another taxpayer who was originally at $200,000 and now drops to $100,000. It is the difference between a 33% decrease and a 50% decrease. If the revaluation results are postponed (inasmuch as the revaluation has been done already, it’s just that the results are not politically palatable to those in power), what happens, NO MATTER WHAT BUDGET IS APPROVED is the mil rate that is calculated will be unfair to the property owner whose larger percentage decrease has been ignored. Is that fair? How will those people react when they discover/understand they are subsidizing folks who were not hurt as badly in the last five-year tough real estate market? Is the Mayor being accountable to all the taxpayers? Can he explain why we will have completed the reval, paid for the work, and not get to look at the results? Time will tell.

    0
    1. Nothing like the city paying for a required service and seeing the real value of our properties, rather than the current top of the market values we are now taxed on. A 65 (on the very optimistic low side) mil rate does not win any sitting elected officials elections.

      0
    2. If the revals are complete, bought and paid for by tax dollars, are they not subject to an FOI request if the mayor does not release them? Does he alone get to make the call to not use them? Do we have to take his word for it they are too damaging for the city to implement? Sorry, but I have a hard time just taking his word for it.

      0
  3. Finch’s idea of good public policy are bailouts for his failures. Postpone reval, waive or decrease pension contributions, tax anticipation notes, state covers BOE budget gap. He somehow has gotten away with kicking every can down the road. One of these days he’ll be gone and Bridgeport will be left, in fact, bankrupt.

    0
    1. That is such a great point. Everything keeps getting pushed down the road and there is no responsibility today when problems are easier to solve rather than later. He is such a wimp, a real leader stands up to the test. Today we lack real leaders like FDR and other greats who were not afraid to rise to the occasion. This is true leadership, not this cowardly crap. Just imagine if the likes of FDR were to pass the buck down the road like it is being done today.

      0
      1. Historical update:
        In 1933, FDR invented The New Deal to offset the consequences of depression. Deficit Spending is always about kicking the can down the road. However, FDR was adamant about repealing 100% of his New Deal initiatives once recovery occurred. That didn’t happen. Today, Congress could learn a lot from FDR.

        0
    1. With little or no industrial taxes, with little commercial taxes and with homeowners footing most of Bridgeport’s real estate taxes, Finch is just kicking the can down the road for homeowners revaluation in the future will help the next inept fly to get elected.
      Ladies and Gentlemen, Bridgeport has been bankrupt for 30+ years and its debt to the taxpayers mirrors the federal gov’t and the state gov’t. If politicians were businessmen/women, they’d be bankrupt and out of business one and all. They know not how to generate positive revenue, only how to tax and spend.

      0
      1. Bob, so if this is the case and the debt to tax ratio is in this condition, then what can be done? Is there even a solution? Or is this something that cannot be remedied?

        0
  4. There could be a way around this. I am not really sure but you could try. If you buy a piece of property you could contest the valuation based on the sale price, if the sale price was fair market value. All valuations are an estimated value but the sale price of a property is the actual property value. The idea is, sell your property to yourself or your wife but you have to have a fair market price based on what other properties like yours sold for near you. It would be best if you were selling the house to a stranger but then you would not own your house. You could contest the evaluation based on an assessment of the property as well. I am sure this would be a PITA and the city would do everything to dissuade people from doing it but you are allowed to protest your evaluation.
    If you put on a new roof or did some other improvement to the house you could request a new assessment. Most people do not do this because it would raise the value of the house but in this situation the overall value of the house could go down.

    0
  5. Some people seem baffled. Don’t be surprised if Mayor Finch leaves Bridgeport in better shape than when he assumed the office. All these reasons underscore the severity of the situation and not the Mayor’s shortcomings.

    0
  6. Of course Hizzoner is happy, it keeps another mil rate increase off his record. That is the singular reason for his “especially pleased” state. When he gets beat in 2015, the new mayor will have to clean up his mess. This is not one of MY crazy sticking points. It’s going to happen anyway. I think energies are more valuably expended on things that CAN have a more permanent impact. In our City there are many. Really good news for suburbia, though.

    0
  7. Mojo,
    Thanks for your personal statement: “The delay works for me at this time so I’m for it!”

    Will you explain your comment? May we assume you have land and building and/or an automobile to be taxed? If so then you certainly know the current assessment (October 1, 2008) and the current mil rate. However, to say the delay works for you, and know that it is so, you would need to see what Vision has provided as of October 1, 2013, and then make some assumptions about other locations around the City, no? Care to explain? Time will tell.

    0

Leave a Reply