Malloy Reports Drug Incarceration Down Dramatically

News release from Governor Dan Malloy:

Governor Dannel P. Malloy today announced that, following the adoption of his Second Chance Society bill last year, the number of people incarcerated in Connecticut jails for drug possession has been reduced by 39 percent.

The bill, which took effect on October 1, 2015, was designed to continue the progress being made in further reducing the state’s dropping crime rate, as well as ensuring that nonviolent offenders successfully reintegrate into society and become productive workers in Connecticut’s economy. Among other things, it reduced the penalty for possession of drugs from a felony with a seven-year maximum sentence to a misdemeanor with a maximum of one year in jail.

“We can truly be tough on crime by being smart on crime, and that includes creating a system that focuses on permanent reform, not permanent punishment,” Governor Malloy said. “Across the nation, both Republicans and Democrats are changing their approach to crime reduction towards strategies that are showing successful outcomes. We must do away with the failed policies of the past that plague so many of our communities and move towards reforms that end the cycle of poverty, crime, and prison.”

On the day of the bill’s effective date, there were 510 people in Connecticut prisons for simple drug possession. Today, that number stands at 311.

In addition, the number of people incarcerated in Connecticut prisons is approaching a 19-year low. Today, the state’s total prison population is 15,195, down from 16,084 around this same time last year–a reduction of more than five percent.

“The Connecticut NAACP is pleased with the initial results of the Second Chance legislation and will continue to support Governor Malloy in his comprehensive review and reform of the criminal justice system. Fewer drug related arrests and fewer nonviolent, low-level convictions have resulted in a significant drop in incarceration rates,” NAACP Connecticut President Scot X. Esdaile said. “The Connecticut NAACP will continue to call for smart reforms that will ensure reasonable and fair enforcement of laws with the expectation that savings realized will be reinvested in employment and re-entry programs.”

“The cruel and unjust drug policies of the past disproportionately tore apart minority and low-income families and communities. Today, because of the Second Chance Society’s reforms, Connecticut has decreased racial disparities in our prisons and is closer to righting the wrongs of the past,” American Civil Liberties Union of Connecticut Interim Executive Director David McGuire said. “This new data shows that Connecticut is on its way toward creating a 21st century justice system. We hope that this drop in the state’s prison population will serve as inspiration and encouragement for policymakers to keep moving forward with compassionate, commonsense justice reforms.”

0
Share

4 comments

  1. But the state is doing nothing more with treatment and recovery centers. They are keeping them out of jail but not helping with their recovery. Saving money with the prison system but not reinvesting in people’s futures.
    Very, very short-term solution to a long-term problem.

    0
  2. Exactly, Bob. Number of overdose deaths, up dramatically, while the number of drug-related incarcerations are down dramatically. Interesting statistics. Tragic statistics, because they are certainly not unrelated.

    Out of sight, out of mind? If arrests aren’t made, drug-abuse stats collection becomes more problematic. Fewer arrests is good on several levels, but what are the costs to addicts and those affected by their addictions if they are allowed to completely slip into the background?

    What is the statistical relationship between drug addiction and unemployment? How are these stats related? Is burying drug addiction stats a desired side effect of the new leniency laws? Does dysfunctional Connecticut just want to take a cheap way out of addressing both drug addiction and unemployment?

    Anything “progressive” this state does seems to be born of motives that are anything but “progressive.”

    0

Leave a Reply