Cockadoodledoo! Torres And Blagys: When It Comes To Chickens Let The City Charter Roost

Toole and friends
Chris Toole tends to his chickens and friends at animal shelter. CT Post photo.

UPDATE: News 12 video coverage. Rick Torres and Phil Blagys, Republican candidates for City Council in the 130th District, say some eggheads on the City Council are plucky about chickens and other farm animals receiving sanctuary courtesy of Mayor Bill Finch. They have a suggestion: follow the City Charter. Commentary follows … bawk bawk:

According to today’s CT Post, our City Council members aren’t about to be caught with their pants down when it comes to the mayor’s attempt to circumvent them in the creation of backyard chicken guidelines (see Post link below). In their view, chicken policy needs vetting, $400,000 driveways not so much.

We’d like to save the Mayor and the busy City Council some time by offering the following advice regarding this pressing issue. Leave it alone and just follow city ordinance. We know this may be a foreign idea, but if you just read Title Six, this issue is already covered–for chickens, pigs and other animals as well. “No person shall keep or maintain … hens, chickens, roosters … within the limits of the city without a written permit thereof from the Board of Health …”. Because we don’t have a Board of Health, this decision should be left up to the Director of Health. If there’s any question regarding this, have the City Attorney’s office weigh in. They’re pretty good at interpreting the code of ordinances. Just ask the five city employees who continue to hold City Council positions.

So on a “case by case” basis, the Director of Health would consider each applicant. He or she would figure out the rules which should include number of birds, coop size, setback, etc. And he or she will then direct Environmental Health to visit each property to confirm its appropriateness for backyard chickens based upon these criteria. And yes, the charter does provide for enforcement of these decisions by stating that permission can be granted as well as “revoked.” We believe in less government regulation, not more, and in empowering our respective departments heads to make decisions based upon human judgment, common sense and existing charter provisions.

CT Post story here.

0
Share

26 comments

  1. Joel,
    Are you old enough to remember the Ed Sullivan Show on Sunday evenings at 8:00 PM? Singers (Elvis and The Beatles), dancers, humorists, jugglers, magicians and on occasion animal acts. More than one performer included a horse or a dog that could count, and perform what seemed to be some basic math. Though I don’t remember them using dollar signs.

    $400,000 driveways are one thing that gets raised often since the story appeared. But what about October 15, 2013, tomorrow evening and time for a Budget & Appropriation meeting, over 100 days into just about one-third of the 2013-14 budget year and yet, as of Friday, there has not been one monthly financial report available for the public to review (or for the CC to paw the ground about, or bark about, either). Why not? Who will ask? Do you think your Council person feels any anxiety about this concern of yours? Obviously they do not understand the serious nature of financial oversight over taxpayer dollars in our City, right?

    If you believe your taxes are dear to you, and the CC does not feel OPM (other people’s money) is very important, then taxes continue to rise, and combating “waste” is a low priority. Chicken “waste” (according to Steve Auerbach is good for his garden, though I may add it needs diluting or it may burn your plantings) at least, is useful to some of us.

    But what about Council waste? What do you call it? Do you wrap it up in CT Post plastic? And where does it get ultimately dumped? Or do you just vote it out of our Council Chamber? Time will tell.

    0
    1. Jim Callahan, I don’t if Andy was ever stationed at the Clarence Street firehouse but I was assigned there and there were chickens next door to the firehouse and they woke us up every day at 5am. The weekends were worse because you had cockfights, gambling and after-hours liquor being sold, all on that short street.

      0
  2. I’m sure Lydia is already crafting a proposal to create more jobs for inspector positions for people she wants to help out from the “community” to address this latest fake emergency.

    0
  3. Lydia may have started something new for the City. We can first send Finch and his gang to the same chicken shelter and The City can change its name from the Park City to “First in Chicken Flight.” Maybe new auto plates will follow.

    0
  4. Fascinating how much expertise is out there on side issues. Someone told me chickens are permitted without number but no roosters. Is it because they may wake up the electorate?

    I understand hen houses “go better” with roosters that don’t turn into roasters. I don’t want to disturb the feathers of any strutting rooster in this City, but I might encourage them to scratch up more dirt before every last one ends up on the chopping block. Time will tell.

    0
  5. *** Though I love the thought of having a few chickens and a rooster in a coop in the backyard for fresh eggs andchickens, but like any animals you must upkeep their food, health, home and surroundings, if not things can get messy real quick and draw unwanted critters which could lead to “live action” and a possible visit from the “TURTLEMAN,” no? ***

    0

Leave a Reply