Perhaps you need to post a picture of Anthony Puccio for the benefit of your overall audience?
Are there about 5,000 voters more or less in City districts for local Council races, so there should be thousands more voters in the State House Districts? At the moment candidates to earn a nod from a newly bordered State District has not been able to come to a conclusion. A minority of voters, less than 20%, from the Democratic Party and in the District has such a close result that it is contested and fought in the courts.
Lennie, you have used the words ” disenfranchising voters” yet in light of numbers just referenced above, it is the registered but NO-SHOW voters who can only blame themselves for any and all issues and grievances that they may have. A legitimate candidate will admit attention to and perhaps provide answers when they secure two years in office by winning. Gerrymandering of District lines, poor communications in spite of availability of State funds, and regular, local absentee ballot infractions are partly reasons for voting weakness. Is there more to it than that? Were enough doors knocked on? Time will tell.
JML, Lennie, ( Shillie) doesn’t want to talk about Gerrymandering of District lines, poor communications in spite of availability of State funds, and regular, local absentee ballot infractions are partly reasons for voting weakness, or the week long missing bag of AB’s that Judge Stevens will have to attest authoritatively.
I suspect that Judge Stevens is taking a well-considered legal approach toward fulfilling the appropriate application of the law to the legal absurdities generated from the inanities of yet another farcical Bridgeport political contest. He’s thinking in terms of honoring the obligations of his court to due process and right outcome (of which there really can’t be one, in the latter case) even as he his does his professional best to prevent the further waste of court time, energy, and money on Bridgeport’s no-win (tail-chasing) political situation — should his decision fall short of a final resolution… He’s going for the Solomon Decision in a situation involving the Keystone Cops vs. the Gang that Couldn’t Shoot Straight — all coming at him from the political Twilight Zone…
Two things are evident about Judge Stevens from his handling of this case thus far — he’s patient, and eminently circumspect…
Perhaps you need to post a picture of Anthony Puccio for the benefit of your overall audience?
Are there about 5,000 voters more or less in City districts for local Council races, so there should be thousands more voters in the State House Districts? At the moment candidates to earn a nod from a newly bordered State District has not been able to come to a conclusion. A minority of voters, less than 20%, from the Democratic Party and in the District has such a close result that it is contested and fought in the courts.
Lennie, you have used the words ” disenfranchising voters” yet in light of numbers just referenced above, it is the registered but NO-SHOW voters who can only blame themselves for any and all issues and grievances that they may have. A legitimate candidate will admit attention to and perhaps provide answers when they secure two years in office by winning. Gerrymandering of District lines, poor communications in spite of availability of State funds, and regular, local absentee ballot infractions are partly reasons for voting weakness. Is there more to it than that? Were enough doors knocked on? Time will tell.
JML, Lennie, ( Shillie) doesn’t want to talk about Gerrymandering of District lines, poor communications in spite of availability of State funds, and regular, local absentee ballot infractions are partly reasons for voting weakness, or the week long missing bag of AB’s that Judge Stevens will have to attest authoritatively.
Jack is still the voice for the 127th!
I suspect that Judge Stevens is taking a well-considered legal approach toward fulfilling the appropriate application of the law to the legal absurdities generated from the inanities of yet another farcical Bridgeport political contest. He’s thinking in terms of honoring the obligations of his court to due process and right outcome (of which there really can’t be one, in the latter case) even as he his does his professional best to prevent the further waste of court time, energy, and money on Bridgeport’s no-win (tail-chasing) political situation — should his decision fall short of a final resolution… He’s going for the Solomon Decision in a situation involving the Keystone Cops vs. the Gang that Couldn’t Shoot Straight — all coming at him from the political Twilight Zone…
Two things are evident about Judge Stevens from his handling of this case thus far — he’s patient, and eminently circumspect…