Again any legislation should include a minimum set aside to fight drug addiction by increasing beds for detox, programs and new technology in battling the problem.
Otherwise it is just blood money instead of taxes.
Bob, without a doubt because there are clergy members who are going to fight the passage. I understand what Harvey is saying, I think the cost will prevent adding those programs Bob although they are needed, a good health care plan would be a big help.
Just another Sin Tax, Let the Clergy open those Massage Parlors and turn those Churches into Toke Parlors and Houses of Ill Repute so we can finally TAX your Ass!
Is this what the Clergy and Steve Strafstrom hopes to bring back to Black Rock Center?
Toke Houses and Massage Parlors again?
We already have to many Flucking Bars………Rep’s Stallworth, Stafstrom ?
Bob, I don’t know of any marijuana that is addictive in fact most marijuana users never come close to being addicted to weed. They do not lose control of its use; they generally use the amount they want to use and when they want to use it. When they use marijuana, they get the exact results they expect and intend to get. Marijuana is not a Gateway Drug, but studies show it shouldn’t be used by those under 18 years old until their brains are fully developed. Will legalization make younger children use it, hell no because it’s very easy to get right now by anyone that wants it and has the money. Those ministers need to get their heads out of the sand because it’s painfully obvious that they did no studying on marijuana and just relied on those old negative stereotypes of pot. I invite those ministers into the 21st century.
Don
I am not thinking people are becoming addicted to weed. But why not if we are opening up the sale of weed treat a problem with this cure.
Marijuana may not be physically addicted but may be physiological. And it maybe a gateway drug.
Here is an opportunity to do something good but instead the state will take its cut and give something to cities and tell us if the cities want to use their share to fund more programs they can do it.
Not enough.
Again any legislation should include a minimum set aside to fight drug addiction by increasing beds for detox, programs and new technology in battling the problem.
Otherwise it is just blood money instead of taxes.
Not gonna happen.
Bob, without a doubt because there are clergy members who are going to fight the passage. I understand what Harvey is saying, I think the cost will prevent adding those programs Bob although they are needed, a good health care plan would be a big help.
Just another Sin Tax, Let the Clergy open those Massage Parlors and turn those Churches into Toke Parlors and Houses of Ill Repute so we can finally TAX your Ass!
Is this what the Clergy and Steve Strafstrom hopes to bring back to Black Rock Center?
Toke Houses and Massage Parlors again?
We already have to many Flucking Bars………Rep’s Stallworth, Stafstrom ?
Bob, I don’t know of any marijuana that is addictive in fact most marijuana users never come close to being addicted to weed. They do not lose control of its use; they generally use the amount they want to use and when they want to use it. When they use marijuana, they get the exact results they expect and intend to get. Marijuana is not a Gateway Drug, but studies show it shouldn’t be used by those under 18 years old until their brains are fully developed. Will legalization make younger children use it, hell no because it’s very easy to get right now by anyone that wants it and has the money. Those ministers need to get their heads out of the sand because it’s painfully obvious that they did no studying on marijuana and just relied on those old negative stereotypes of pot. I invite those ministers into the 21st century.
Don
I am not thinking people are becoming addicted to weed. But why not if we are opening up the sale of weed treat a problem with this cure.
Marijuana may not be physically addicted but may be physiological. And it maybe a gateway drug.
Here is an opportunity to do something good but instead the state will take its cut and give something to cities and tell us if the cities want to use their share to fund more programs they can do it.
Not enough.