Mayor’s Budget Cuts Spending, But Tax Impact Unclear

Mayor Bill Finch presented a $490 million spending plan to the Bridgeport City Council on Monday for the budget year that begins July 1, roughly $2 million less than the current year budget, courtesy in part of significant union concessions he achieved the past several months.

This is a screwy budget to assess quickly in terms of tax impact because it’s a revaluation year in which some property owners face property value increases and some decreases. I’ve spoken to some homeowners bracing for a major tax hit while others say they expect to receive a reduction based on notification of property values.

In a memorandum to council members Finch emphasized spending reductions overall from last year, cost decreases in nearly every major department and without a tax surcharge to the business community. The mayor’s budget recommends decreasing spending in the Police Department by roughly $1 million (current year budget $78.5 million) and $750,000 in the Fire Department ($51.3 million current year), made possible by union concessions.

He proposes a 10 percent cut to city libraries (gutted in his prior budget with most cuts reinstated by the council) but a 10 percent increase to the CitiStat Program that monitors departments for efficiency.

As for the Board of Education, it appears the mayor has submitted a flat increase. Stay tuned for the annual BOE/mayor showdown.

Sounds like the mayor’s saying okay boys and girls, here’s the budget, I’ve cut spending, I’m declaring victory, you deal with it.

Lots of unanswered questions. For instance, where department cuts exist such as the libraries will there be layoffs? The city is also at the mercy of ongoing state budget negotiations. What the state passes will impact the city.

“You’re going to need a math professor from Fairfield University to explain this budget document,” councilman Bob Walsh, an accountant, told OIB Monday night.

The Budget and Appropriations Committee will conduct its first budget session tonight. See previous post for a schedule of committee meetings. The full council will set the mil rate in June.

Hey, while the budget may be a little murky did ya see where Bridgeport/Stamford/Norwalk region was declared by Forbes as the fourth most livable area in the country? Maybe that will spike property values. Every little bit helps.

What’s the deal with the Connecticut Post website down all day Monday? Something we wrote?

Statement from Gov. Rell and state employee bargaining unit:

Governor Rell and State Employees Union Leaders announced (Monday) that they had worked out the framework for an agreement intended to help reduce costs and protect public services in the current fiscal year and the upcoming biennium. When finalized, the agreement will provide for labor cost savings of over $637 million in the upcoming biennium, in addition to savings in the current fiscal year. The framework also provides job security for permanent employees during the upcoming biennnium, as well as the flexibility needed to make organizational changes. Details of the agreement are still being discussed, including translating its job security provisions to the particular circumstances of the Judicial Branch and higher education institutions.

In order to respect the democratic processes of the unions involved, Governor Rell and union leaders have agreed not to provide details to the press until they can be presented to union delegates and members. This process is expected to take several days. However, the Governor and union spokesperson have confirmed that the proposed agreement includes a Retirement Incentive Program, in addition to changes in health insurance and wages.

While the parties expressed optimism that a positive result would be reached, they cautioned that more work remains to be done, and that any agreement ultimately must be presented to union membership for ratification, and to the General Assembly for approval.

0
Share

29 comments

  1. This should be a very interesting couple of weeks. I am intrigued by the proposed increase for Citistat. It’s common knowledge that John Gomes is not happy with the way he has been treated by this administration. He recommended sweeping changes in Public Facilities but was beat down by Charlie Carroll. I’m not aware of any other dept he is studying except that he did get rid of the wasteful 211 system. I have faith that Gomes knows what he’s doing but I’m not sure if anyone is listening to him. So why the proposed 10% increase? Maybe he’s going to hire his own Administrative Assistant; one who will actually assist him.

    0
    1. *** Doesn’t he have some type of staff now or is he solo on this wasteful venture to nowhere that’s deemed to get a possible 10% increase? Also, what’s new on the missing tax money & who’s getting the blame? Basically there should be no depts. getting increases, either cuts or stay the same ’til things get better. Anyone want extras for their depts. they should do like Iris Molina does every year for her dept. (apply for as many state or fed. grants available to help assist in departmental needs). She’s amazing in what her dept. does on a shoe-string budget backed by her tireless search for grants! *** Just where is the Forbes report written at and by whom that seems to think that Fairfield County is so affluent & such a wonderful, average cost type place to live? *** Forget about it! ***

      0
  2. The Forbes report has me grinning from rear-to-rear.

    This is the annual feel-good report for Bridgeport Spin Meisters and Mistresses about Bridgeport. The report is really about the Statistical Market Survey Analysis of the Stamford, Norwalk and Bridgeport corridor. It has less to do about Bridgeport, but more to do about affluent surrounding suburban towns.

    The Business section in today’s Connecticut Post discusses exodus of companies from urban areas to suburbs. One reason is because the “boss lives there”.
    Look at the article regarding gentleman who founded Sobe drinks and now has a new drink coming to market.
    No mention of his company coming to Bridgeport. Gee, maybe we can give millions of dollars in tax credits no to come our home “Port”.

    I don’t want to sound like a soiled sport, but I have to go wipe myself on this bullshit press release. Where’s Mr. Whipple when I need him?

    0
  3. A few homeowners had their properties reevaluated by professionals and the tax assessor’s office accepted the findings. From what I’ve read (in the Connecticut Post of all places, who’da thunk?!) and heard, the assessor’s office has made assumptions on more than a few properties, e.g., that the basement or the attic was finished into living space, etc.

    0
  4. The Birdman cut staffing levels AND he has done a credible job in cutting spending. Not bad. Now, if he will do something about all of his Patronage outrages, he may pass as an acceptable municipal manager. God, it’s tough to eat your words.

    0
  5. One more thing. Maybe he could look in on his Economic Development Director to see if the guy has done anything to attract new business or identify new revenue sources.

    0
  6. yahooy

    Don’t get all caught up in the Bird Brain Bath yet.
    Bill has done some good things. However, city is still bloated and furloughs do nothing to abrogate legacy costs associated with pension and health care.

    You should have a shot of Old Crow because I don’t think you’re going to be eating any crow. Maybe some nice pigeon from one of our fine Portuguese restaurants in town. I’m partial to Carmelina’s. Slow service but great Pork ‘n’ Clams and Mariscada.

    I heard they even have an inside bocce court. “Green Shoots!”

    0
  7. Do not get me wrong. I am no Finch Fan. I still think he is dreadful. But we are heading, albeit slowly, in the right direction. So I have to give the dickhead some credit. Not ashamed to do so. Don’t look for similar comments about Anna though.

    Portuguese in Bridgeport is a woefully underestimated asset in our fair city. I concur totally. Carmelina’s is great! So is Omanel.

    0
  8. anna,

    I thought the Milford Board of Health shut your operation down at the Liberty Rock? Word on the street is that you moved to The Came-A-Lot in Stratford! The Cougar’s out on the prowl looking for a Milf.

    0
  9. The mayor’s budget recommends decreasing spending in the Police Department by roughly $1 million (current year budget $78.5 million) and $750,000 in the Fire Department ($51.3 million current year), made possible by union concessions. This is ALL “smoke and mirrors.”

    0
  10. After reading Mojo’s earlier post, methinks he has a little crush on Iris!!! But he is right that Iris has done a great job finding grant money to save her dept when the City money was taken away several years ago. Mojo neglected to say that many other depts have done the same thing. The problem now is that the Finch administration is against applying for any new social service grants. In fact, they want to outsource all of the existing programs and layoff anyone funded through a grant. This is Finch’s way of streamlining government by eliminating services even though they don’t cost the city a dime. Very foolish. So even if Iris has grants now to fund her programs, Finch could choose not to reapply next year and there’s nothing she can do about it. Look what happened to the Health Dept.

    And Mojo, you asked about the CitiStat staff. Gomes has himself as well as Carol Curry. Carol is an appointee but from what I see at the Annex, she works hard and has good intentions. Also on staff is Ezequiel Santiago who is a bit of a no-show. And since they are part of the CAO’s office, Lisa is supposed to be their admin asst but you know how that worked out. I believe in the concept of CitiStat but they have to be able to make changes in spite of the politics and I don’t see that happening. At least not yet.

    0
  11. I swore off this blog but I heard something today that I have to post. Perhaps a fellow blogger with a real estate connection can check this out. I heard that John Fabrizi purchased a house on Heppenstall Street in the north end that he plans to rent to Sacred Heart University students. Seems that Fabs is going to cash in on the lucrative student housing market and damn the neighborhood. I believe there was a change in the zoning laws that limit the number of unrelated people who can live in the same house. What a hoot if AmyMarie and Michelle Lyons have their former mayor fined for violation of the zoning laws. SHU students are out of control in certain parts of the north end. The more people rent their houses to them, the worse the problem will be. Thank you Mayor Fabrizi for being a stand-up guy. You’re just a punk!

    0
    1. “I heard something today that I have to post. Perhaps a fellow blogger with a real estate connection can check this out”

      Why don’t you check your Crystal Ball and tell us.

      0
  12. Thanks for confirming Lennie. You obviously don’t live in the SHU area and have obviously never had drunken SHU students puking, peeing, screwing and fighting on your front lawn. Ok they’re not all party animals but the ones that move off campus do so for one reason: to party without the rules and supervision of SHU authorities.

    0

Leave a Reply