The City Council Monday night passed a resolution calling for “Transparency and Accountability with the Department of Homeland Security” to protect immigrant families.
The resolution declares in part:
the City Council hereby calls upon all federal law enforcement agencies to limit their immigration enforcement action within the City of Bridgeport to those operations targeting undocumented immigrants who have, or are suspected of having, committed felony offenses or crimes of violence, or are known gang members, and/or otherwise pose a serious safety threat to the community, in order to improve public safety in Bridgeport;
Statement from Make the Road CT
Victory! 🙌🏽 The resolution PASSED!
A powerful win for our community, and this is just the beginning.
Thank you to Councilman Jorge Cruz and the entire Bridgeport City Council for voting YES to protect immigrant families.Thank you to our amazing community members and partners like PT Partners @ptpartnersbport and Bridgeport Generation Now @bptgennow for showing up, raising your voices, and standing in solidarity.
Now that it has passed, we will continue to fight to ensure it is fully implemented and that our immigrant families get the protection they deserve. This win belongs to all of us, and we keep going
Full resolution:
WHEREAS, the City of Bridgeport, CT values its ethnic, racial, and socio-economic diversity, and the Bridgeport City Council is committed to enabling all our residents to live and pursue their livelihoods in peace and prosperity with stable and united families; and
WHEREAS, Bridgeport’s residents are known for welcoming with open arms immigrants from nations around the world to Connecticut’s most populous city, and the City Council approved a Welcoming City resolution May 15, 2017 to publicly pronounce that position; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bridgeport bears the responsibility for providing local public safety services for all its residents and the Bridgeport City Council maintains its strong support of Bridgeport’s status as a Welcoming City; and
WHEREAS, in serving and protecting all City residents, the Bridgeport Police Department does not stop, detain, arrest or transfer individuals based solely on real or perceived immigration status or warrantless immigration detainers or administrative warrants; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with City Ordinance 2.125 TRUST Enforcement Act, the Bridgeport Police Department fully complies with all federal laws; and does not, and will not, attempt to prevent United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or Department of Homeland Security (DHS) or any other federal law enforcement agency from acting independently in their efforts to locate and detain undocumented immigrants; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Bridgeport believes in upholding the due process rights enshrined in the United States Constitution and laws, including those afforded to undocumented persons within the United States; specifically, the Fifth Amendment provides that “No person shall ….be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law,;” (emphasis added), and
WHEREAS, this Resolution is not intended to, and will not, obstruct, hinder, or interfere with the legal exercise of federal immigration enforcement authority, but rather is intended to, and will, enhance transparency, accountability, and public safety within the City; and
WHEREAS, according to a Connecticut Public Radio report[1] published in May 2025, there have been at least 12 Bridgeport undocumented immigrant residents who have been arrested recently by federal law enforcement officials (at least some of whom had no criminal record and were not suspected of any illegal activity other than their immigration status), resulting in a palpable sense of fear and unease in our neighborhoods; and
WHEREAS, certain law enforcement activities have been conducted by federal officers wearing face coverings, and without prior notice given to city officials; or sharing information about where these individuals are being transported to; and
WHEREAS, face coverings and lack of visible identification can pose significant safety risks[2] to local police officers who must be able to distinguish federal officers performing legitimate immigration enforcement actions from individuals impersonating ICE or other DHS agents, in order to harass or assault others, including vulnerable women; of which there have been various reported instances on the East Coast including in Georgia,[3] South Carolina,[4] North Carolina,[5] Maryland,[6] Pennsylvania,[7] and New York;[8] and
WHEREAS, the ability for the public to identify all law enforcement officers during interactions promotes professionalism, transparency, and accountability.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Bridgeport encourages local community groups, social service organizations, faith institutions, legal service entities, immigrant advocacy support societies, and other interested agencies to engage in ongoing public education and awareness campaigns throughout the Bridgeport community to inform our residents of their due process rights and how to legally exercise them when interacting with law enforcement agencies and when navigating the civil immigration and criminal legal system; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council hereby calls upon all federal law enforcement agencies to limit their immigration enforcement action within the City of Bridgeport to those operations targeting undocumented immigrants who have, or are suspected of having, committed felony offenses or crimes of violence, or are known gang members, and/or otherwise pose a serious safety threat to the community, in order to improve public safety in Bridgeport; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council hereby calls upon all of its federal elected representatives in Congress to urge federal immigration officials to cease all immigration raids at public places unless the undocumented immigrants have, or are suspected of having, committed felony offenses or crimes of violence, or are known gang members, and/or otherwise pose a serious safety threat to the community, as such activities create palpable fear and disruption in the community; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that no City of Bridgeport department, including the Bridgeport Police Department and its officers or employees, shall collect, request, retain, or disclose any information about an individual’s immigration or citizenship status, national origin, or place of birth for the purpose of civil immigration enforcement. This includes refraining from entering such information into any local or federally accessible database, unless required by state or federal law; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City of Bridgeport and its departments shall not grant direct or indirect access to any city-operated surveillance or automated data system — including but not limited to license plate readers, CCTV or traffic cameras, predictive policing tools, or biometric databases — to any federal agency for immigration enforcement purposes, except pursuant to a valid, specific judicial warrant, unless otherwise required by state or federal law; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, unless prohibited by state or federal law the Bridgeport Police Department shall, on at least a monthly basis, publicly disclose all requests received from federal immigration authorities — including but not limited to ICE or DHS — for information, access, or assistance of any kind. Reports must include the date, nature, legal basis (if any), and whether the city complied, partially complied, or denied the request; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, no City of Bridgeport department, including the Police Department, or any of its employees, shall participate in any joint task force, operation, training, or information-sharing arrangement with federal immigration enforcement agencies, where the primary purpose involves civil immigration enforcement or removal. This prohibition applies regardless of which agency is the lead, unless required by state or federal law; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, no department may enter into, renew, or extend any contract, agreement, or memorandum of understanding with a private vendor, data broker, or non-governmental entity that permits, enables, or facilitates access to city-generated data or surveillance systems by federal immigration enforcement agencies — unless required by state or federal law or specific judicial warrant. For any existing contracts that can’t be immediately amended or terminated for legal or practical reasons, the City should take all legally permissible steps to restrict the use, disclosure, or sharing of such data for immigration enforcement purposes. That could include imposing access limitations through internal policy, administrative controls, or technical safeguards wherever possible; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council hereby calls upon every member of the community to contribute time, resources, and financial support to existing nonprofits, community service organizations, faith-based organizations, businesses, and labor unions so that all can unite in the common goal of assisting individuals and families impacted by the ICE immigrations raids; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, officers of the Bridgeport Police Department and employees of the City of Bridgeport shall not collaborate or support ICE’s efforts in the city, per the Trust Act; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED officers of the Bridgeport Police Department and employees of the City of Bridgeport shall not collaborate with, or support, ICE’s efforts in the city per the State of Connecticut’s Trust Act, unless required by state or federal law; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon passage of this resolution by the City Council of the City of Bridgeport, a copy of this resolution shall be submitted to State Senators and State Representatives of the City, as well as the City’s Federal Congressional delegation.
[1] Jim Haddadin, “ICE Arrests are up in Connecticut. Here’s Where Migrants were Apprehended,” Connecticut Public, July 3, 2025, https://www.ctpublic.org/news/investigative/2025-07-03/ice-arrests-connecticut-where-migrants-were-apprehended.
[2] Michael Gagne, “ICE Agents’ use of Masks in CT Causes Confusion and Panic: ‘They’re Supposed to be Public Servants’,” Stamford Advocate, July 3, 2025, https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/article/ice-agents-ct-masks-confusion-new-haven-danbury-20395223.php.
[3] Zak Cheney-Rice, “No One Can Tell Who’s a Cop Anymore: Masked criminals are impersonating ICE agents and police, preying on an already terrorized public.,” New York Intelligencer, July 28, 2025, https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/trump-immigration-ice-agents-masks-criminal-imposters.html.
[4] Artemis Moshtaghian, Gloria Pazmino and Nick Valencia, “Multiple ICE impersonation arrests made during nationwide immigration crackdown,” CNN, February 5, 2025, https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/04/us/ice-impersonators-on-the-rise-arrests-made-as-authorities-issue-national-warning.
[5] Aaron Thomas, “Police arrest Raleigh man accused of impersonating ICE officer and sexually assaulting woman,” WRAL News, January 27, 2025, https://www.wral.com/news/local/raleigh-police-arrest-man-impersonating-officer-sexual-assault-jan-2025/.
[6] Ava Blando and Simone Jacques, “Men Are Impersonating ICE to Attack Immigrant Women. MAGA Emboldened Them.,” Ms. Magazine, September 2, 2025, https://msmagazine.com/2025/07/10/men-impersonating-ice-agents-immigration-customs-attack-women-maga-trump/.
[7] Moshtaghian, Pazmino, and Valencia, “Multiple ICE impersonation arrests made.”
[8] Aaron Katersky, “Attempted rapist told victim he was an ICE agent: Police sources,” ABC News, February 12, 2025, https://abcnews.go.com/US/attempted-rapist-told-victim-ice-agent-police-sources/story?id=118741709.


Considering this resolution and the Port CC has no authority over Federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement and how they apply there “ethics”
https://youtu.be/pYV174KetLc?si=cmgJUn–cWiSIOoB
Since this resolution has no Authority in how ICE conducts its to say this resolution was unwarranted in how the Port’s goverment apparatuses apply its “ETHICS” in response, be it adherence to said resolution.
Good job politics, and good luck.
https://youtu.be/pYV174KetLc?si=cmgJUn–cWiSIOoB
My bad,
https://youtu.be/wtc4f7Ez7FA?si=QmuAxhcPmpwLjjbS
Try to play nice Port pols, and get out vote #neighborhoods, no kings.
Not sure what’s worse, Obama not endorsing Mamdani or Trump endorsing Cuomo🤣
https://youtu.be/BE9CXWV1alg?si=JvgexOVj3EufHA9R
Great while they are at it about about this one :
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR TRANSPARENCY, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND PROTECTION OF THE INTEGRITY OF ELECTIONS IN THE CITY OF BRIDGEPORT
WHEREAS, the City of Bridgeport values its diversity of ethnic, racial, and socio-economic backgrounds, and the Bridgeport City Council is committed to enabling all of our residents to exercise their civic rights freely, fairly, and with confidence in the integrity of our democratic processes; and
WHEREAS, the residents of Bridgeport deserve elections that are secure, transparent, and conducted according to the rule of law, so that public confidence in local government is preserved; and
WHEREAS, there is documented and serious concern that the use of absentee ballots, absentee-ballot drop boxes, ballot-handling and ballot-application processes in Bridgeport have been subject to misuse, manipulation, or the appearance of manipulation, including:
The 2019 mayoral primary in Bridgeport where campaign workers and political operatives were charged with unlawful possession of absentee ballots and other election-law violations.
The 2023 Democratic mayoral primary in Bridgeport in which surveillance-video evidence and absentee-ballot irregularities led a Connecticut Superior Court judge to invalidate the primary and order a new primary election.
The arrests in February 2025 of multiple individuals in Bridgeport, including prominent political operatives and city council members, for alleged misuse of absentee ballots, misrepresentation of eligibility, assisting voters improperly, and unlawful possession of ballots and envelopes.
The concern by the Chief State’s Attorney that allegations of election fraud and vote manipulation in Bridgeport are “serious matters comparable to cases stemming from the embezzlement of public funds.”
WHEREAS, without vigorous safeguards, the integrity of elections can be compromised, undermining democracy, diminishing public trust, disenfranchising voters, and enabling manipulation of outcomes; and
WHEREAS, the Bridgeport City Council believes in upholding the due-process rights, equal protection rights, and the fundamental democratic right of every eligible voter to have their vote counted fairly and honestly; and
WHEREAS, this Resolution is not intended to target any legitimate voter, campaign, or method of voting lawfully used, but rather to strengthen the transparency, accountability, and security of the electoral process in Bridgeport so that all eligible voters may participate with trust and confidence.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Bridgeport encourages community associations, civic-engagement organizations, faith institutions, legal-aid entities, election-awareness advocates, and other interested stakeholders to engage in ongoing public education and outreach, informing all residents of their rights, the legal requirements of absentee-ballot processes, how to report concerns about possible misconduct, and how to access authoritative information regarding election rules and procedures; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby calls upon all municipal, state and federal election-administration agencies (including but not limited to the Office of the Secretary of the State of Connecticut, the State Elections Enforcement Commission, and the Chief State’s Attorney’s Office) to prioritize investigations of absentee-ballot irregularities in Bridgeport, including prompt auditing of ballot-collection boxes, absentee-ballot applications, chain-of-custody logs, distribution lists, video-surveillance of drop-boxes, and any other relevant documentation, so as to restore and maintain public trust in the electoral systems; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council demands that any individual, campaign, or organization found to have knowingly engaged in absentee ballot tampering, ballot-box stuffing, misrepresentation of eligibility, improper assistance to voters, or unlawful possession of ballots or election materials in Bridgeport be held fully accountable under Connecticut law; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council calls upon the State of Connecticut and, if appropriate, the United States Department of Justice, to undertake comprehensive oversight and review of the electoral processes in Bridgeport — especially those involving absentee ballots and collection boxes — and to adopt and enforce best practices to prevent future misuse; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Bridgeport and its departments shall not grant access, direct or indirect, to any city-operated surveillance or data-system — including but not limited to ballot-collection-box camera footage, election-monitoring logs, chain-of-custody records, or ballot-handling records — to any non-governmental vendor or private contractor for purposes which could compromise transparency, unless required by valid state or federal law or pursuant to a judicial warrant; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that unless prohibited by state or federal law, the Bridgeport City Clerk, Board of Elections, and all relevant municipal departments shall publicly disclose on at least a monthly basis all absentee-ballot-drop-box usage statistics, applications for absentee ballots, the number of ballots collected from each drop box, and any requests or referrals for investigation of absentee-ballot irregularities in Bridgeport; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council calls upon every resident of Bridgeport — every civic-minded person, community group, neighborhood association, business, faith community, union and nonprofit — to support financially, operationally, or via volunteer engagement the work of transparent and trustworthy elections: including civic-monitor programs, voter-education initiatives, poll-worker support, and any efforts consistent with strengthening electoral integrity; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon passage of this Resolution by the Bridgeport City Council, a copy of this Resolution shall be submitted to the State Senators and State Representatives representing Bridgeport, the Connecticut Secretary of the State, the State Elections Enforcement Commission, the Chief State’s Attorney of Connecticut, and the City’s Federal Congressional delegation, together with a request that they coordinate to ensure the integrity of elections in Bridgeport and foster full transparency and accountability.
While they are passing more meaningless resolutions that do nothing and waste their time and, by extension, the citizens of Bridgeport, how about passing one like the above and this one:
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING ACCOUNTABILITY, OVERSIGHT, AND SANCTIONS FOR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS IN THE CITY OF BRIDGEPORT WHO VIOLATE THE LAW OR UNDERTAKE MISCONDUCT AFFECTING THE INTEGRITY OF GOVERNMENT
WHEREAS, the citizens of Bridgeport entrust their elected City Council members with the responsibility to uphold the law, act in the public interest, maintain high ethical standards, and protect the integrity of the democratic process; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bridgeport has, over many election cycles, experienced serious allegations, investigations, and criminal prosecutions of absentee‐ballot fraud, election misconduct, misuse of ballots, and other violations of election statutes, including in the 2019 and 2023 Democratic mayoral primaries.
These recurring issues undermine public trust in the City’s governance, the fairness of elections, and the legitimacy of public institutions; and
WHEREAS, the Bridgeport City Council recognizes that misconduct by any council member — including but not limited to crimes, election law violations, fraud, corruption, breach of ethics, absentee ballot abuses, impersonation of officials, or other serious wrongdoing — not only reflects on the individual member but diminishes the credibility and functioning of the entire municipal legislative body and the broader democratic system; and
WHEREAS, the Council believes it is both appropriate and necessary to adopt internal rules, oversight mechanisms, and sanction processes to protect the integrity of the City Council, hold members accountable for wrongdoing, safeguard the democratic rights of all residents, and restore public confidence in local governance; and
WHEREAS, this Resolution is not intended to circumvent statutory criminal processes or to penalize legitimate political activity, but rather to establish transparent standards of accountability, cooperation with investigative authorities, and internal disciplinary procedures for elected City Council members who are accused or found to have violated the law.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Bridgeport hereby adopts the following accountability framework for its own members:
Duty to Report and Cooperate
All City Council members shall promptly disclose to the full Council Executive Committee (or designated ethics/oversight sub‐committee) any indictment, arrest, criminal charge, or formal investigation (state or federal) related to their official duties, election law, absentee ballots, fraud, ethics violations, or other misconduct. Members shall fully cooperate with law enforcement, election authorities, and internal Council investigations, subject to applicable legal rights.
Temporary Suspension of Participation
When a Council member is formally charged (indictment or criminal complaint) with a felony or election‐law violation related to absentee ballots or public office misuse, the member shall be automatically suspended from voting rights in Council meetings, committee assignments, and representation responsibilities, pending resolution of the matter (plea, trial, or dismissal) or formal disciplinary decision by the Council.
Presumption of Removal of Privileges
If the member pleads guilty, is convicted, or formally admitted misconduct (whether criminal or serious ethical violation) for which the Council determines the public trust has been breached, the Council shall remove the member from all committee chair positions, leadership roles, and may with a two‐thirds vote impose additional sanctions, including censure, forfeiture of stipend/benefits, prohibition from representing the City in external bodies, or referral for expulsion.
Expulsion from Council
The City Council reserves the authority, by a vote of at least two‐thirds of its full membership, to expel a member who:
a) has been convicted of a felony or election‐law felony; or
b) has admitted or been found to have committed serious misconduct that materially undermines the integrity of the Council or elections in Bridgeport.
Expulsion shall result in immediate vacating of the seat, and the City’s vacancy procedure shall be triggered.
Public Disclosure and Transparency
The Council shall publish annually (or more frequently as needed) a report summarizing: any disclosures made by members under this policy, the status of investigations/charges involving members, any suspensions or removals of privileges, and actions taken by the Council under this accountability framework. The report shall be made available to the public and posted on the City website.
Ethics and Election‐Integrity Training
All Council members shall complete annual training on municipal ethics, local election‐law requirements (including absentee ballots, drop boxes, chain of custody, and voter assistance), conflict of interest rules, and transparency obligations. Attendance shall be a condition of retaining committee assignments and offices.
Referral to Independent Oversight
The Council agrees to refer to the Office of the Chief State’s Attorney, the State Elections Enforcement Commission in Connecticut, or other appropriate external authority any credible allegation of election misconduct involving a member of the Council. The Council will assist with internal inquiries, provide access to relevant records, and honor lawful subpoenas or investigative demands.
Protection of Whistleblowers and Voter Rights
The Council shall establish and publicize a mechanism by which City staff, campaign workers, election volunteers, or residents may report suspected misconduct by Council members relating to elections, absentee ballots, misuse of office, or theft of votes. Allegations may be reported anonymously or with confidentiality, and the Council will not retaliate against any individual making a good-faith disclosure.
Review and Amendment of Council Rules
The Council directs its Rules Committee (or other designated body) to review internal rules of the Council, the Code of Conduct, and procedural bylaws to ensure alignment with this Resolution and best practices for accountability, transparency, election integrity, and public trust. The committee shall submit recommended amendments within 90 days of adoption of this Resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon adoption of this Resolution, a copy shall be transmitted to the Mayor of the City of Bridgeport, the Connecticut Secretary of the State, the State Elections Enforcement Commission of Connecticut, the Office of the Chief State’s Attorney, and each member of the City’s legislative delegation in the Connecticut General Assembly, with a request that they support enforcement of election‐law integrity and monitor compliance within Bridgeport; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council reaffirms its commitment to preserving the right of every eligible voter in Bridgeport to cast a ballot free from fraud, manipulation, intimidation or misrepresentation, and to ensure that its own members meet the highest standards of legality, ethics, transparency and public service.
#NOKINGS
No doubt there is room for casual conversation about CIVICS in the City. The next session is on Saturday November 8, 2025 at URSA Gallery, 245 Fairfield Ave., Bridgeport at 9am.
Comments to City Council -11-3-2025
Ladies and gentlemen of the City Council greetings on this Monday session of the legislative body just before balloting 2025. We will know the details of voting totals within the next 48 hours, not only as to your future as representatives in the ten districts but also to the response of registered voters to the prospect of a new and improved City Charter, to replace the 1993 model that has outlived its usefulness, perhaps.
At a time when many of our Bridgeport residents are worrying about food security, Social Security continuation, and rent subsidies from HUD the focus has been taken away from local matters. Perhaps we shall look at the results in terms of voter totals and question where CIVICS is practiced in the City when they are seen? Compared to 5351 votes in 2021?
Casual Civics Conversations have been held across the Library System for months previous to when materials were developed. Now we have a brochure that contains some of the many invitations I have extended to each of you to hold such conversations in each district. How did you respond or show interest? Do you think the subject of becoming and continuing as an informed voter was well in hand? Or did you seriously believe that keeping voters in the dark, though registered and uninformed by the Town Committee itself, is a better, more controllable environment?
Personally, I have been disappointed by civic response to the more than 25 meetings and hearings by the Charter Commission and the City Council over major and minor details of that document, some debated and left alone; others revised for simplicity of understanding, ease of administration, and to decrease unnecessary taxpayer expense. More needs to be accomplished with the document at its next review. But oversight in the meantime is a worthy objective so that we can eliminate the 1993 direction to the City to create “an economic development and housing commission”, ignored for three decades. We must do better and get all citizens participating. A new Charter provides steps!! Time will tell.
“…The next session is on Saturday November 8, 2025 at URSA Gallery, 245 Fairfield Ave., Bridgeport at 9am.”
Will free breakfast be served ?
Citizen Gonzalez,
Perhaps you mistake me for a City Council person with a stipend that purchases much pizza in Bridgeport?
Not my way. A conversation, especially a casual can happen when people are seated comfortably around a table, some with water or coffee, some with food of preference, others without satisfied by listening and contributing to the subject matter and opinions being offered about MUNICIPAL Matters.
Housing? Economic development? City department responsiveness? Personal safety and property security? Schools and education? Youth activities? Environmental issues? Taxes? Securing info about government activities? Living on a pension in retirement and unsatisfied? What type of community are we passing to the youth of the community?
Does serving breakfast really matter? Time will tell.
JML, how about a piece of cheese and cup of Joel for Speedy?
Lennie, you would think he’d at least tell me who the City Council person with a Pizza budget is. McCarthy or Burns? Perhaps Castillo the Grape?
John, they say breakfast is the most important meal of the day, 🤣
Perhaps, you should try to connect with CC members an co host/ co-sponsor your civics educational conversations within each district. And perhaps it will Pony up for breakfast or a box of joe/ coffee and donuts.
Perhaps I will be in attendance, John. Speedy I hope you will join us. I would love to get your point of view on various Port issues BAM😂
Meanwhile, as a Port exercises it’s democracy vie the vote
https://www.reuters.com/world/jesus-not-virgin-mary-saved-world-vatican-says-2025-11-04/
Though there might be some herbs and spices missing in that gravy🤣
I mean, I’m not a rocket scientist. Shit, I’m barely a literate, retard , and I can see some questionable fundamental flaws, gaps in the spiritual family, God of Abraham’s books/ scriptures.
Not withstanding the original, God of Abraham seeming going Darth Vader who killed a bunch of kids and then practically everybody in the world, but apparently it’s a bit off to say these are God’s words that are unchangeable yet they keep on being changed. Isn’t it fair to say Jesus came to say the world from himself/God🤣
https://youtu.be/zNDQ2D8iAOc?si=Olr6FdhJY9nlR9xy
More “spifically” 🤣 how far you going down that rabbit hole/ “internal debate that had befuddled senior Church figures for decades, and even sparked rare open disagreement among recent popes?”
You know that Man versus God, thing, Not to mentioned the non-believers of the world who won’t be saved/ can be saved, with that spiritual family, Shit what about the rest the Buddhas, the Hindus, the atheist Etc?
To be fair, to each their own, whatever floats your boat, “Guides” that thing defined as ethics and get you on first rounding third I guess. Right Jobu? 🤣
https://youtu.be/vMM9LMB7XsU?si=_H7jxt_SMizESls8
Full disclosure, I am biased with an leaning inclination towards Korean Jesus. Though some times I feel you don’t have time for my Earthly / worldly problems 🤣
https://youtu.be/C-nFusdpHtw?si=DdyQveb9OSE3wBJ2
Try to play nice, good luck.
P.S not sure where the Keymaster falls in all this, J S
https://youtu.be/RYnFIRc0k6E?si=Xdi0GlNGSmNcTsTT