2011 mayoral candidate Jeff Kohut is lending his policy wonk ideas to Joe Ganim’s campaign. Kohut shares why he thinks Ganim should be elected.
Bridgeport is, unarguably, a special place. Of course, it is known to the world as the home-base of P. T. Barnum – perhaps the best salesman and most imaginative businessman of all time, who virtually created Bridgeport from the blueprints of his imagination and his salesmanship.
While it’s obvious that Barnum’s Bridgeport of prosperity and greatness has fallen from grace and is widely perceived as a place where dreams and people die, we mustn’t forget Barnum himself built his fame, fortune, and the City of Bridgeport from a series of alternating disasters and triumphs. He created the modern circus from the ashes of disaster of his New York museum, and built a succession of ever-grander homes in Bridgeport in response to alternating periods of success and failure (coupled with personal tragedy), with the latter firing the nuclear furnace of his imagination, propelling him to create and fulfill ever-grander dreams for his circus and his city, causing him to build and sculpt both into vital aspects of the modern world.That Bridgeport has fallen from grace would only be reason for Barnum to create an even grander idea for the place and to work evermore tirelessly to give birth to a phoenix that would completely eclipse its progenitor.
To this lifelong Bridgeporter, watching my city fall from grace has been at once heartbreaking and maddening.
Our downtown, a formerly vibrant, regional retail and entertainment destination–and major piece of the city’s tax base/jobs–now lies largely fallow and barren; the victim of deliberate, planned, tax base theft by the Bridgeport suburbs, in particular, Trumbull.
Similarly, a significant part of our pre-existing, city-based manufacturing sector–along with potential operations that might have been inclined to gravitate to Bridgeport’s advantageous location–were hijacked by Trumbull and Shelton as a result of the politically engineered availability of Bridgeport infrastructure and the Route 25-8 access created for them by that Bridgeport-resisted, state-mandated highway.
But the most outrageous aspect of Bridgeport’s decline is the deliberate impoverishment of our city through the use of official state and federal red-lining policy, engineered by the Fairfield County Gold Coast (Stamford/Norwalk/Greenwich, et al.), such that high-value redevelopment and living-wage jobs are directed away from would-be location to Bridgeport and instead directed to Stamford/Fairfield County Gold Coast-suburban towns.
The only city leader to address the root causes of our decline during these past 60 years was a young Joe Ganim, who, during the 1990s, fought to correct the exploitation of Bridgeport by its suburban neighbors in his attempt to force Trumbull to cease its exploitation of Bridgeport infrastructure in the theft of our jobs and tax base, and in his bid to bring jobs and tax base back to Bridgeport in the face of fierce opposition from Stamford and other towns that benefit from Bridgeport’s distress.
Joe Ganim might have brought Bridgeport back had he not taken a wrong turn on the political highway and fallen from grace.
But Joe Ganim is back now–older, much wiser, and powerfully motivated in pursuit of redemption.
Like Barnum, Joe Ganim is determined to come back better than ever, taking Bridgeport to new heights, beyond the best days that it saw under P.T.
Joe has shared his vision for Bridgeport with me. Joe knows his number-one priority has to be the creation of a vehicle for massive relief from the crushing property taxes driving the sky-high mortgage foreclosure, personal bankruptcy, and business failure rates in our city. Joe has a detailed plan for Bridgeport homeowner and business tax relief. (A big tax rollback could be possible for us soon, under a Ganim administration!)
Of course, the vehicle for major, long term tax relief for Bridgeport is married to the core socioeconomic need of the creation of tens of thousands of living wage jobs for Bridgeporters. The creation of these jobs entails the building of an additional $15 billion dollars of tax base/grand list value such that we will rebuild the equivalent of what we have lost since 1960. *(Current Bridgeport grand list/tax base–$7 billion; Stamford–$24 billion.) We talked about a new plan and model for development. A comprehensive plan that would see us back to prosperity. We talked about Bridgeport becoming the technology/manufacturing center of the future, leading the way in the New Industrial Revolution. We spoke of using our remaining manufacturing base as a nucleus for a massive, new manufacturing base creating new, essential products for the world. We talked about enlisting cutting-edge science and new technology, via local universities and corporations (such as UB and GE) in the creation of the new Bridgeport manufacturing powerhouse by way of the reclamation/reuse of our abandoned industrial core.
The general plan we discussed involved creating energy self-sufficiency in Bridgeport through innovative, Bridgeport-manufactured products; it involved the development and use of cutting-edge modes of transportation by way of a new Bridgeport manufacturing sector enlisting Bridgeport operations of companies such as GE and Sikorsky. Also targeted will be the development, manufacture, and use of futuristic, cutting-edge security/anti-crime technology and products in concert with the Computer Engineering Department of UB (a national leader in computer engineering, IT, and anti-crime/security technology). (Bridgeport will become the safest city anywhere, through Bridgeport-developed and manufactured technology, in conjunction with innovative community policing methods, such as through the use of “virtual” neighborhood patrols by the police and neighborhood block watch groups. In this regard, public-safety leadership will serve as a business driver.)
We also talked about developing and implementing new technology/products in conjunction with the development of university/corporate-created land reuse expertise, to remediate and safely reuse our vast, contaminated brownfields. In this regard, another Bridgeport manufacturing/service sector could be created and exported to regional markets and the rest of the world.
Joe Ganim sees the great potential of our huge regional markets (that is, the Northeast Corridor mega-market) for the export of myriad manufactured products and services, as well as our land, sea, and air potential for shipping our products to the rest of the world. He sees, and fully understands, Bridgeport is better situated than most places anywhere–for efficient redevelopment as a leading developer, manufacturer and exporter of the essential, peacetime products of the future.
And, unlike his fellow mayoral candidates, Joe Ganim has a comprehensive, detailed plan to fulfill this vision for Bridgeport. The Ganim Plan will bring Bridgeport back to a place that would make P.T. proud–and envious.
Joe Ganim is back. And now he wants to take Bridgeport back–to the future!
Vote for Ganim–and your future–on Wednesday, September 16.
Excellent, Jeff.
Jeff, really? “Joe Ganim might have brought Bridgeport back had he not taken a wrong turn on the political highway and fallen from grace.” He did not take a wrong turn on the political highway, are you kidding? He stole 100s of thousands of dollars. Other than the baseball park and the arena, what did Ganim do? Tell me about the buildings taken by eminent domain where the land stood empty and we collected no taxes.
You can talk about high-paying jobs but we will not fill those jobs with an untrained workforce. Jeff, you keep up what you are doing, dazzling people with bullshit.
I am sorry but I just do not see how Joe Ganim can come close to accomplishing even a fraction of what Jeff Kohut lays out.
“Barnum’s Bridgeport of prosperity and greatness has fallen from grace.” As has Waterbury, New Britain, Hartford, New London, etc.
These changes were not the result of some evil cabal that just wanted to feed cheap labor to Stamford and Greenwich. Change happens and it’s often painful. It took these Industrial Revolution cities 50-60 years to become what they are today and 50-60 years from now, these cities will again be totally different.
With a better CT state policy, could Bridgeport also have benefited as did Trumbull or Shelton? Certainly, although the “Pay to Play” mentality in Bridgeport under Ganim certainly was also a major factor in where manufacturing and office parks landed.
The Ganim Plan is a dynamite wish list. Who would not want even 50% to come true?
But pragmatically, for any major, substantive changes in Bridgeport will only be possible with the support of both the CT Statehouse and Washington DC. I just don’t see them lining up behind the Ganim Plan with Joe Ganim as Mayor. Nor do I see major corporations beating a path to our door.
The U.S. is very slowly taking baby steps to a better economy and you can see that with Bridgeport development currently. Now’s not the time to risk losing any momentum as Bridgeport certainly did under the previous Ganim administration.
Denis OMalley,
That was an excellent post. Didn’t Trumbull start building during the Ganim administration on our borders increasing their tax base while ours lay stagnant?
Jeff Kohut, are you a spokesperson for Joe Ganim? This is the first I have heard of his plan. I understand Joe Ganim is busy running nearly every aspect of his campaign, but does he know he has his supporters delivering their own messages??? Time will tell. If that’s the case I will deliver my vision of what I want the Finch economic development plan to be and take it to the streets.
Reforming the tax assessment process is one of the most important items for any incoming mayor to do. It is totally out of whack. A glaring example is a house on Clifford Street. The owners cannot sell it for $43,000 because it has been assessed at over $200,000. The annual tax bill is more than $7000.00. What the hell? That’s 15% of the sale price. Will Bill Finch offer an abatement to encourage the sale?
Jeff, is this you bringing your vision to Joe? Jeff, here is one thing you forgot to mention and that is during Joe Ganim’s term in office the entire Ganim administration and entire DTC and Party had only one vision for Bridgeport and that was having a CASINO, nothing else mattered, that’s why all the land for Steal Point was stolen.
Ron Mackey, I agree 100 percent!
So then we let RCI Group and Bass Pro steal it!
With a 20-year return on investment, only Finch would write this deal!
There was a plan in Hartford that was “killed” for an indoor amusement park. It would be nice to see if the developer hasn’t found another location. It is my belief we could accommodate it at Pleasure Beach. Just a thought.
Hector, I don’t know if you remember but back when a casino was the main agenda, on the front page of the CT Post was a drawing of an amusement plan for Pleasure Beach by Steve Wynn. At that time Gwen Shaw was the district leader for the 134th district (Ralph Ford was not in the district because the district lines were changed) and I was the DTC vice chair (with no say or power) and Ms. Shaw called me because she was upset seeing the picture and article in the Post and no one had mentioned anything to her so she asked me to go with her to see Kaye Williams because it was his plan. Mr. Williams told us it was all set with the council members and with those in power. The deal had issues because of the federal government and how the land could be used.
Interesting turn of events:
Danny Roach, Joseph P. Ganim’s campaign manager, sent a letter to Santa Ayala, the Democratic registrar, to conduct supervised balloting. It read in part:
“Whereas past primaries and elections in Bridgeport have been wrought with allegations and charges of absentee ballot fraud, I hereby request that your office conduct supervised balloting in complexes that have 20 or more requests for absentee ballots.”
According to Michael P. Mayko’s reporting in this morning’s Connecticut Post’
“Ayala could not be reached for comment late Friday.
Meanwhile, Av Harris, a spokesman for Secretary of State Denise Merrill, said the State Elections Enforcement commission is empowered to investigate complaints about alleged fraud with any aspect of voting including absentee ballots.
‘If Mr. Ganim or anyone else suspects foul play with absentee ballots, they are free to file complaints with the state elections enforcement commission.’
However, Roach is looking to stave off any problems.
‘Historically Bridgeport has seen elections where a candidate wins on the machine vote but loses by a lopsided absentee ballot count,’ he said. ‘After what happened in the nominating convention, we have some concerns and just want to make sure the primary vote is taken on a level playing field.’
Mr. Roach speaks from experience: he has been known to manipulate absentee ballots in the past. This is similar to Las Vegas casinos hiring ex-card cheats to work security.
Amazing. Step right up, righteous Bridgeporters! We might just be witnessing the destruction of the nasty machine!
I should write “self” destruction.
Jeff, I don’t know you, however P.T. Barnum would be proud. For you to correlate Ganim’s fall from grace to P.T. Barnum’s success is mind-boggling, exquisite, extraordinary, and kind of insulting at the same time.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdANEt5Xrmk
What you are insinuating is Bridgeport is being exploited by Trumbull, Shelton, Stamford, Norwalk, Easton, Greenwich etc., and are stealing/hijacking high-paying jobs and Bridgeport development tax base. I think you need to add this word to your vocabulary: “Competition.” Bridgeport is in competition with all the surrounding towns.
The number-one priority is not taxes or crime, it is education in all forms. Lack of education is the single most destructive vehicle in keeping a person in poverty. I-95, Route 25/8 and the transit system travels both ways. If these cities and towns lure these businesses from Bridgeport, Bridgeport residents can still apply for those higher-paying jobs, but if they don’t have the educational skill level to perform these types of jobs, they don’t even have a shot at getting the job, never mind other obstacles they may have to overcome. I will agree with you to some type of cabal to keep people in poverty but not because of crime, taxes, or lack of developments with a high pay. It’s because of the lack of being properly educated and I saw and experienced it first hand.
While I appreciate your flare for your support for Joe and your concerns for Bridgeport and its residents, I’m having a hard time understanding Joe’s plan. Can you please explain the vision Joe shared with you about Bridgeport’s utopia? Because I can’t ignore some simple truths. What technology/manufacturing do you see coming to Bridgeport? These manufacturing jobs you’re referring in my mind have gone to China or even Mexico. I don’t see Bridgeport competing with them. Detroit can’t compete with them. It’s not like we’re not trying to compete.
www .washingtonpost.com/solyndra-politics-infused-obama-energy-programs/2011/12/14/gIQA4HllHP_story.html
The corporations you stated like GE is selling off its parts and will probably leave Connecticut entirely. Sikorsky’s closed its Bridgeport plant and sold its Stratford plant.
www .ctpost.com/news/article/Sikorsky-to-cut-1-400-jobs-close-Bridgeport-plant-6302510.php
They’re building cargo ships the size of five football fields.
www .youtube.com/watch?v=4Xj1EZtGjQ4
They’re even rebuilding the Panama Canal to accommodate the ships.
www .usatoday.com/videos/news/nation/2015/03/26/70485970/
Jeff, I don’t share your view on the future of Bridgeport. Not on the success, but on its direction.
The only economic development I recall from the Ganim era is a strip mall with a Bob’s Furniture Store and Dunkin Donuts, built by Joe’s friends and benefactors the Lenocis.
That property could have been a corporate tower or residential highrise with first-floor retail. What a waste of acreage in downtown, across the street from a community college. “Mistakes were made,” no kidding!
Amen, I remember seeing all the high-paying jobs it created. 🙂