Kohut Stands Up For Fabrizi: Resourceful Leader

Jeff Kohut
Jeff Kohut

Jeff Kohut, 2011 petitioning candidate for mayor and policy wonk extraordinaire, shares a commentary urging former Mayor John Fabrizi to run for his old job. Fabrizi has formed an exploratory committee for mayor. From Kohut:

I had the opportunity to spend some time in the Seattle, Washington area last summer. It is a beautiful, vibrant, socially and politically progressive area with abundant affordable housing, low unemployment, and many thriving manufacturing concerns of all sizes–from aerospace and information technology to lower-tech sectors such as basic metal-working and paper products production (not to mention the very important, well-exploited tourism sector). There is also a large service-sector employment base that supports the burgeoning manufacturing sector.

When I look at the social, commercial, and geographic assets of the Seattle area versus our own Fairfield County/New York Metro area–there are many similarities–I find myself hard-pressed to understand why, with all of our natural assets, our area has much higher unemployment, insufficient affordable housing, and general socioeconomic regression.

In particular, Bridgeport, a former regional economic engine, can’t seem to reverse its negative momentum–even with its proximity to the base of so much of the world’s capital, in New York City.

One glaring difference between our area (e.g., Bridgeport) and the Seattle area that is easy to identify is the lack of strong, progressive leadership at the municipal and state levels (see the Everett Sunday Herald of 7/14/13–“Everett’s mayor takes on new role”).

Indeed, it is focused, determined, point-on leadership in bringing business to Bridgeport that we need even more than we need dollars from Hartford and Washington.

It is amazing how no one in Hartford or Bridgeport made as much as a whisper concerning the option of the Bridgewater Group to locate their new, $750 million headquarters to Bridgeport’s Steel Point development after they were rebuffed by Stamford in their efforts to locate their new HQ to the similar Harbor Point development on that city’s waterfront.

What Bridgeport needs is a hands-on mayor who is rooted in, and devoted to the city–a mayor who loves the city and is willing to listen to the people and put their welfare before his/her own political aspirations.

In my lifetime, we have had only one such mayor–John Fabrizi.

I had the good fortune to work with Mayor Fabrizi as a public-safety and economic development activist/proponent, as well as a member of the Ethics Commission.

While I didn’t always agree with Mayor Fabrizi’s policies and decisions, I appreciated his willingness to listen to the citizens of Bridgeport, consider and often implement their suggestions for improvements in government, public safety, and economic development, and to go out on a limb, politically–on a local and state level–to pursue the interests of Bridgeport.

While mayor, John and Bridgeport first lady, Mary Fabrizi, participated in several neighborhood safety patrols with the Lake Forest Block Watch. As mayor, John took direct action on many occasions to assist the Lake Forest neighborhood in its quest to address traffic safety and other public-safety challenges in that part of the North End. Truly, it was the Fabrizi Administration that reconstructed the city’s public safety capacity following its severe erosion during the latter part of the Ganim Administration. Most of the public-safety capacity that Bridgeport enjoys today was put in place by the Fabrizi Administration nearly a decade ago.

We also have to appreciate Mayor Fabrizi’s willingness to appoint independent voices and create upgrades in the functioning of the city’s Ethics Commission via his revival of that moribund commission following its implosion during the Ganim Administration.

And we must not forget the hundreds of new jobs that the Fabrizi Administration brought to Bridgeport (RBS bank and Pitney Bowes, et al.), as well as the many hundreds of existing jobs that he saved through his point-on advocacy on behalf of Bridgeport and its business community.

Yes, John Fabrizi had to deal with some of the demons that often attack driven people of passion and ambition–especially people in the political arena–but he conquered those demons and learned from the experience. I believe that he has emerged from those battles a much wiser, much stronger man and will be a standard-setting mayor because of his triumph over those demons.

John Fabrizi is an intelligent, resourceful, well-educated politician, manager and leader. But, more importantly when it comes to being the mayor of Bridgeport, he is a man of passion and loyalty who is not afraid to advocate for and defend that which he holds near and dear–including family, friends, and the City of Bridgeport.

I sincerely hope that John Fabrizi runs for mayor of Bridgeport–and wins–in 2015. I intend to support him. I would urge my fellow Bridgeporters to do the same.

0
Share

17 comments

      1. Gracious and well though-out response by Foster to a not-so-gracious throwing down of the gauntlet by Lopez. I don’t blame Lennie for not wanting to sensationalize this petty, cheap shot.

        0
  1. That was a serious tribute to Mayor Fabrizi. Who is Jeff Kohut? Joel, Jeff is a caring person who believes in Bridgeport. He ran for Mayor and has written numerous letters to the editor as well as editorials in the Connecticut Post. He focuses on jobs jobs jobs and has been instrumental in raising the level of awareness attempting to bring manufacturing back to Bridgeport.

    John Fabrizi does have a passion for the City. I can remember he came out to Glendale Avenue to make sure it was paved. I had two Finch signs on my lawn and John had decided he was not running. He still left his office and came to my home, and walked the entire length of Glendale. The paving was going to stop one house before mine, needless to say I was on the phone with the Mayor’s office and Michelle Lyons. Needless to say, problem solved.
    I can understand Jeff’s tribute. John Fabrizi is very well liked in the City. I can understand why.

    0
  2. Ernie Newton Seeking To Dismiss Criminal Charges
    By CHRISTOPHER KEATING, ckeating@courant.com The Hartford Courant
    6:30 p.m. EDT, July 10, 2014

    HARTFORD – An attorney for former state Senator Ernie Newton said Thursday that he will ask a judge to dismiss seven criminal charges due to a recently discovered audit that he says exonerates Newton of campaign finance fraud.

    The defense team never saw the audit by state election officials until recent weeks, but it says that Newton had reached the minimum $15,000 fundraising threshold to qualify for more than $80,000 in public financing in a state Senate primary that he lost in August 2012. The fundraising is at the heart of the criminal charges because the prosecution charges that Newton never reached the threshold and should have never received the public money–leading to a felony count of first-degree larceny for “falsely obtaining thousands of dollars in public funds.”

    Attorney Darnell D. Crosland, who represents Newton, read some details of the audit during a hearing in Superior Court, telling Judge Joan Alexander that 357 campaign contributions had been certified as “qualified” under state rules and that the final tally was $15,020–just barely above the threshold.

    “Mr. Newton has reached the threshold for qualified funds, which has brought us here,” Crosland told the judge. “We’ve been before this court for about two years. … We’re approaching a Brady issue or a discovery issue because this should have been turned over a long time ago.”

    The judge responded that she was not ruling that prosecutors were guilty of a “Brady” violation–meaning that they had not turned over evidence that would prove the innocence of a defendant.

    In a rare appearance in court, deputy chief state’s attorney Leonard Boyle–the second-highest ranking state prosecutor–said that the “draft summary” of the audit that was dated June 3, 2013 was a mistake.

    “I have reason to believe the 2013 date was in error,” Boyle told the judge, adding that the document should have been dated one year later.

    The prosecution charges that Newton came up $500 short of the fundraising threshold and then prompted five campaign workers to sign cards that stated that they had contributed $100 each. The state says that Newton then used the false documentation to gain the public financing.

    Crosland, who had not met Boyle before, was surprised that such a high-ranking state prosecutor had arrived in court on the Newton case.

    “When you see a supervisor come out, either there’s some smoke coming out of the galley or there’s a fire onboard,” Crosland said. “This ship is definitely sinking.”

    Crosland said he will seek to have the case dismissed if prosecutors do not drop the case themselves.

    “I think this case should go away, and I compliment Mr. Boyle, who exhibited a real level head today,” Crosland said.

    Reached at his Rocky Hill office after the hearing, Boyle declined to comment because the case is still pending.

    Despite the charges against him, Newton is running in the August 12 Democratic primary in his hometown of Bridgeport against Andre Baker, a member of the city’s school board. A convicted felon, Newton served more than four years in federal prison after pleading guilty to accepting a bribe and other charges.

    During the hearing, Newton formally rejected the prosecution’s plea bargain offer of eight years in prison that would be suspended after he served three years behind bars. The offer included five years of probation on seven counts, including the larceny charge, a felony count of tampering with a witness and five counts of illegal campaign practices.

    If the criminal case is not resolved, a trial could be held starting in December.

    0
  3. On a side note–just returned from downtown Bridgeport Art Fest. It was very well attended sans any elected officials or city workers. The talent was really amazing and the dancers from all over the area were sensational. There were booths lining Main and side streets by McLevy Hall. They had food carts lining State Street. One of my favorites from Reservoir Ave., Bones in a Barrel. It was the future of our city. People spotting outside at Tiagos, energy everywhere, people walking from Ralph and Richies and again, will this continue after Marina Village replacement housing goes up down the street? This one issue could lose an election. BTW , had to stop in at Moe’s burgers for my favorite–the Bridgeport Burger and further down the street watching three graffiti artists show off their urban artistic talents. Tomorrow is another day at the Madison Beach Hotel for brunch. 🙂

    0
    1. Steve,
      I stopped at McLevy Hall, which features the work of Emily Habansky in a number of spaces this month. The booths themselves seemed to have fewer artists than the past two years, my impression anyway. But the dancing and music at McLevy Green and the number of people out for the festivities was great.

      Bumped into David Kooris and we talked a bit about “payments in lieu of taxes” to bring new development to the City but at a lower tax outlay for identical services than current taxpayers. Good idea or poor one for private investors? I look to write on that shortly.

      Saw Chris Rosario and Andy Nunn, so officials, some of them were about.

      Over on Baldwin Green behind the Courthouse was a drum circle that was fun and models the way civic participation should work. Drums of various sizes and other instruments capable of providing rhythmic sounds were available. You came, picked out a noisemaker and proceeded to bang away. All ages, sexes and sizes as well as people from different cultures. Somehow after a while people listened to what their neighbors were producing and the basic beat could be heard, but lots of syncopations were ongoing at the same time. Great experience of community. It also is a release for any frustration by letting your imagination provide a portrait on the drum head for those who fail to listen to you. And unlike a City meeting, there was no one telling your five minutes are over. Any thoughts on that? Time will tell.

      0
  4. I volunteered for Jeff and I still think the people of Bridgeport erred in not electing him Mayor. That said, Jeff always exercises good judgement and I agree with him. Mayor Mandanici does care about the city and actually makes a point of knowing the citizens no matter what your station in life and will not screw over the hard-working employees of the city most of whom work hard to make Bridgeport a safe and pleasant place to live. A city I will always refer to as my home even though I don’t currently live there. After two terms of Bill Finch’s backstabbing, Bridgeport deserves better.

    0

Leave a Reply