Foster Shares Education Mission: “Best Interests Of The Children”

In her most comprehensive speech as a mayoral candidate, Democrat Mary-Jane Foster Monday night delivered her education platform during an address at Gallery 305 on the city’s East Side, calling for a city charter revision establishing a “blended board of education, five members appointed by the mayor according to guidelines that include geography, diversity and experience among other criteria, and four elected by the residents of Bridgeport.” Such a move would require voter approval.

Asserting her call for the state to appoint a special master to oversee city schools in lieu of mothballing the Bridgeport Board of Education, Foster offered a series of specifics and proposals for education reform including parental partnerships, job training for school security, family resource support and “A citywide virtual high school … with our area universities or with a partner such as Charter Oak College. This approach will be effective at reducing our dropout rates by offering course remediation and the opportunity to take courses outside traditional curricula, such as those traditionally offered in vocational high schools.”

Foster’s entire speech below:

Thank you for joining me today. By now I guess you all know I am on a mission–a mission to alert people that democracy–with a little “d”–democracy has been subverted here in Bridgeport. And who would have guessed it would happen at the hands of the mayor? As the next mayor of Bridgeport, I will respect the right to open, honest dialogue and the right of every citizen to vote.

When I heard the incumbent assert, without qualification or condition, that the people of Bridgeport don’t need a voice in our children’s education, because enough of them don’t turn out to vote or enough of them aren’t citizens or enough of them are former offenders, I was outraged.

It fueled my determination to demonstrate, to communicate that I have the leadership qualities and consensus-driven values his words and his deeds so dramatically lack. It occurred to me, when the Commissioner of Education came to Bridgeport to explain the state’s actions, that he went to various groups–religious leaders, the Bridgeport Regional Business Council, the City Council, State legislators, BPSS, to try to persuade everybody of the appropriateness of his actions–all before taking his case to the parents. And that meeting was a product of negotiation–it was not on his original schedule. That’s outrageous. Make no mistake: as I release my education plan today, I come to the parents first. Why? Because I’m a parent, I’ve raised 2 children, I know firsthand that no one cares more about the welfare of my children than I do. We want the best educational opportunities possible for them; we, more than anyone, know how important education is to their futures, and to that of the community they’ll inherit. The fact that we love them means that at some point we want to see them self-determined and independent.

Preparing our children for the exploding world of the future has to begin before they ever reach the school doors. I was the co-chair of Success by Six for almost 7 years. It is a national United Way initiative where the driving motivation is bringing local resources to bear to make sure every child, beginning at birth is ready for school. What sense would it make to turn our primed and ready children over to a public education system controlled by outsiders, no matter how well-intentioned they may be? With the active engagement of parents, other community stakeholders, and the Bridgeport Public Schools, my administration will ensure that our children are prepared for school, and that our schools are prepared for them!

Serving on the Board of Teach For America, I’ve learned about education reform–training teachers to be change agents, shepherding them through two years of the program, then sending them out to make a difference and recruit others. So far, Teach For America has trained more than 20,000 teachers to be dedicated education reformers–in my administration, Bridgeport children will be taught by a corps of teachers–whether Teach for America or other teachers, and we have many, many fine ones, determined to eliminate educational inequality.

A top priority of my administration will be education reform and improving student achievement. Education reform must include an effective teacher for every classroom, a great leader as our principal for every school, and support systems and resources necessary to provide educational opportunities to a diverse student population. Bridgeport Public Schools administrators will be required to develop fully and formalize these goals; parents will have a voice and the right to review the goals so they’ll be able to guide and assist in their children’s education.

We must ensure equity in education when we distribute and allocate resources, rather than pitting one neighborhood against another neighborhood and having the parents of some wondering why their child was shortchanged in comparison to others.

Every child has the right to cutting-edge texts and the latest technology. In a Foster administration, politics will no longer intrude on the educational system; our children are our future, our children are our greatest asset. They need an education that supports being competitive in a technology-driven globalized economy–that will be critical. The Mayor’s office will not intrude on the public schools to use it as a source of political patronage. Rather, as Mayor my role will be to represent you, as parents and voters, in creating and maintaining the synergy that will require commitments from all stakeholders: the Mayor’s office, the Superintendent, the Board of Education, teachers, parents, AND children to meet the challenges and educationally empower generations to come. Together, we will create a new paradigm that will attract both corporate investors and philanthropists to a workforce that’s prepared and eager to jump start progress.

We’re all aware of the huge controversy resulting from the State being invited to take over the Bridgeport Public Schools by the Board of Education at the behest of the incumbent Mayor. To be clear for any of you who may not be sure of my position, and to reinforce and emphasize it for those of you who are–I do NOT support the State takeover of Bridgeport Public Schools! I believe it amounts to a stunning abandonment of the very responsibilities the Mayor and Board of Education are elected to uphold and an egregious violation of our constitutional rights that disenfranchises us as voters. I support a plan whereby the State would change course and appoint a Special Master to take over the public schools with the accompanying monies to effectively manage the schools. I have asked the Governor, the Acting Commissioner Coleman and the General Assembly to rescind their actions and instead give us a Special Master and the requisite funding to make change real in our schools.

Drawing on the recent case of the State’s takeover of Windham schools I believe we are entitled to 12 million dollars for the just administration of the City’s school system from the State of CT. In addition, I reiterate my call for the Superintendent to resign as a significant step in the right direction; AND, more importantly, in order to get the systemic change that will propel our children forward I need your help in electing a new Mayor.

As Mayor, I’ll request charter revision that will establish what I’m calling a “blended” board of education. Five members will be appointed by the Mayor according to guidelines that include geography, diversity and experience among other criteria, and four elected by the residents of Bridgeport. I’ve studied both the Mayoral control model and elected boards of education, and I believe this is an appropriate compromise that will serve our city and our children. I have been reluctant arriving at the mayoral control model but I have come to believe that a mayor has to lead change and ultimately be held accountable for change. I am not afraid of being held accountable. The ambitious reform agenda I’m proposing necessitates a more hands-on, responsible approach. I believe allowing the Mayor to appoint five members of the Board of Education will give Bridgeport stability and focus.

At the same time, I recognize that the people’s voices need to be heard and their informed opinions cultivated, and that dissent must be welcomed in the democratic process. We have had a six-to-three split in the elected Board now that doesn’t allow for the transparency necessary to make the right decisions for our kids. I will welcome dissent and insist on transparency. That is the reason I would never support an all-appointed Mayoral-controlled Board of Education.

In the end, governance reform provides the leadership–but we all have to be a part of change.

Here is my thinking, my agenda for changes that are needed here in Bridgeport.

One, I believe we need to adopt a portfolio schools approach that will allow for the diversity of schools Bridgeport requires. I would welcome having our neighborhood schools alongside more magnet schools, charter schools, innovation schools, and alternative schools. For instance, I would like Bridgeport to host the State’s first charter school run by a teacher’s union. This mixture of schools will give our children and parents the options needed to make the right choices for their children.

In our matrix of schools we need to adapt New Haven and Hartford’s and other districts’ models of grading school performance. In this way, we can evaluate the best performing schools and those that are underperforming, and give the right amount of autonomy to school administrators or provide greater oversight. This performance measurement should take into account test scores and create a list of important metrics–including parent, student and administrative input that will establish whether or not a school is moving in the right direction and in which areas growth and achievement the schools are increasing or decreasing. This type of system must be transparent and have the community’s buy-in and support. Only that kind of collaboration will allow the City of Bridgeport to move to reconstitute or close a school if it continually fails. No longer should any parent or child wonder if closing a school is political or done for budgetary reasons. Schools should be closed or reconstituted because that is what is in the best interests of the children only.

I believe Bridgeport should be a pioneer in blended learning, that we should be at the forefront of allowing students to learn in every possible setting. In my opinion, we currently have too few alternative school settings. We need to investigate bringing back night school as a way of addressing the dropout rate and to institute online learning in middle schools and high schools. A citywide virtual high school can be set up with our area universities or with a partner such as Charter Oak College. This approach will be effective at reducing our dropout rates by offering course remediation and the opportunity to take courses outside traditional curricula, such as those traditionally offered in vocational high schools as well as newer, cutting edge offerings such as Chinese or other languages, technology or arts courses that we could not afford to offer in our “traditional” classrooms.

An honest budget. To make these changes and invest in our schools we need to have an honest budget. We need to reallocate our resources from patronage jobs, streamline administrative positions, and resource our schools more effectively. The budget that was not voted on but referred to the State is unacceptable. What should have happened when the Mayor and Superintendent became aware almost a year ago that we would have a major budget deficit this year is that they should have been dealing with it last year. That way last year’s budget would have taken some hits so this year’s budget did not become Armageddon. Like our state, this city is going to have to ask for significant sacrifices–but sacrifices that are shared by all. And sacrifices that are evenly shared in a transparent fashion. As an alternative, for instance, this mayor could have negotiated with the unions for concessions and made the appropriate cuts so that we would not be put in this situation with the current deficit. Now, Bridgeport faces dire budgetary decisions which we need not have faced. It is unacceptable not to have nurses in our schools, not to have guidance counselors and social workers for our kids. It’s clear that there is no equity in how we finance our schools. Under a Foster administration, I would rather cut the municipal side of the budget and deliver equitable services to all our children than to face these disastrous cuts with which Finch has saddled us.

The sad part is our teachers, principals, parents and children do not know what will befall them this school year which is now just weeks away … This is no way to run a school system-–more than that, it is outrageous. With your help, a new mayor will bring stability, collaboration and the change required for sustained growth.

I will reach out to the teachers’ union and ask them to partner with me and insure that our teachers are the motivated and effective in their classrooms. My hope is that together we can adapt New Haven’s model to Bridgeport’s circumstances and reach a similar agreement on teacher evaluations and outcomes, and that we can take that same approach to make sure that every principal embodies the attributes of a leader for his or her specific school.

Last, but most importantly, it is critical to collaborate with the parents so that everyone is heard. In addition to the United Way’s Success by Six early childhood initiative, Teach for America and the Fairfield County Community Foundations work in education, I have been an angel to the Columbus School for pretty much the last 7 years. I’ve watched a school where, at one point, 65% of their kids don’t speak English at home, 11% of their kids are learning disabled, the district is the poorest school district in the state with the highest crime rate of any school district in the state. The commitment of the principal, the teachers and every one of the social workers changed the potential outcomes. As a result I have become a huge proponent of family resource centers, home school coordinators and ESL programs for parents. We need to do more for our non-English speaking parents and more effectively use our Title one monies to increase our ability to communicate with all parents. We need to do everything in our power to insure our schools welcome any parent in our community that faces obstacles of language or cultural barriers. This is not about parent involvement it is about parent engagement.

We need to make find a way to expand the family resource centers … and put them in every school … I recognize that what is happening outside school impacts a child and that the whole neighborhood impacts a child, that is why we need to make sure that family resource centers continue to be a critical part of helping our schools deal with the complex problems of life. Let our schools become the safe, secure place where families come to educate their children and themselves. Let us be the very best we can be–by doing that, we will educate our children, we will be a community that embraces all and every single one of us. Our community will rise.

We need to respect the new school governance councils and parent district boards, and expand our use of parent surveys so that we can be accurate and instructive on how to improve our schools and move forward.

We especially need to implement training for our school security staff personnel and overhaul how this is managed and give the principals in each school more authority to insure that their school environments are safe and conducive to learning. And by the way, truants will not be tolerated. I will partner with the Bridgeport police to be sure that kids hanging out on the street come to school. Period. End of Subject.

Is this just the beginning of what is needed to be done? You bet. Many of you probably have more ideas and more innovative ways to look at the problem and I am open, I am eager, I want to hear to all suggestions and ideas. This needs to be a community conversation. The sad truth is Bridgeport has too many failing schools. We are considered a dropout factory. We must reform and I believe the opportunity is now.

Can we continue with Mayor Finch? In his testimony and position on the State takeover I think he gave us his answer. He had the opportunity to come to the people of Bridgeport and lead … to show his plan and lead. But he chose not to … he gave up. Instead he went to Hartford and did back room deals and what did he tell them on record? That Bridgeport parents didn’t vote, we were all illegal … or we had quote … past lives that prevented us from participating in the process. The fact of the matter is Bill Finch cannot be trusted. He enjoys telling you about how he is a parent, has kids in the system and cares about education reform but I submit he has been in public service for 15 years or more and what does he have to show for it in education reform?

At the end of the day, we may agree to disagree on parts of an education reform plan, but know this … I will work with you and collaborate with all parties and together we can make Bridgeport a gateway of education excellence … we can pioneer on a number of fronts … and we can yell and scream too … but together … I will have and we can have the interests of the children at heart. This is my pledge to you. Thank you.

0
Share

106 comments

    1. Mayoral Control BOE at its Worst!

      MJF wants to keep politics out of Education by appointing political hacks to control the BOE, and to usurp the power of the people with a majority vote of five. So this is how Foster wants to control the Working Family Party members and BOE?

      MJF: As Mayor, I’ll request charter revision that will establish what I’m calling a “blended” board of education. Five members will be appointed by the Mayor according to guidelines that include geography, diversity and experience among other criteria, and four elected by the residents of Bridgeport. I’ve studied both the Mayoral control model and elected boards of education, and I believe this is an appropriate compromise that will serve our city and our children. I have been reluctant arriving at the mayoral control model but I have come to believe that a mayor has to lead change and ultimately be held accountable for change. I am not afraid of being held accountable.

      MJF, you’re like a Bluefish out of water. Who’s feeding her this bullshit?

      John Gomes for Mayor Now!

      0
  1. Dear MJF,
    I have previously stated Rick Torres was dumber than Bill Finch. You are dumber than them both. How dare you propose the mayor appoint 5 out of 9 members of the BOE? It’s the same scenario we have now! The Mayor will dictate policy to the majority, as the “Elected” minority will be neutered. I am pleased you are open to suggestions, rethink this one. P.S. Please tell me the names of the schools your kids attended.

    0
    1. Hey anti, how is the present system working out? All nine members are elected. The mayor has very little input in the BOE as it stands now. What difference does it make where her kids went to school? You going to go after her kids now? How about some positive input once in awhile.

      0
      1. It is funny to me when elected officials get angry when the public wants to know where their children went to school (see Rahm Emanuel in Chicago and Chris Christie in NJ). It is absolutely the public’s business. If you want to represent the people, they have a right to know if you are representative of them. You want to tell people what’s best for their children when you sent your kids to private school?

        As for the current system of elected members, it works in places where the majority is not controlled by a corrupt political machine. Break the machine.

        0
        1. MJF was the co-chair of Success by Six for almost 7 years. It is a national United Way initiative where the driving motivation is bringing local resources to bear to make sure every child, beginning at birth is ready for school. Serving on the Board of Teach For America, I have been an angel to the Columbus School for pretty much the last 7 years. I’ve watched a school where, at one point, 65% of their kids don’t speak English at home, 11% of their kids are learning disabled, the district is the poorest school district in the state with the highest crime rate of any school district in the state.
          I would challenge both Gomes & Finch to show their record for volunteering in our educational system.

          0
          1. tc,
            “65% of the kids don’t speak English at home.” Let’s teach them to speak Chinese. What a visionary!

            0
      2. tc,
        She wanted input, I gave her some. The only reason the BOE was eliminated was the fear of control being lost to the Working Families Party in this coming election. MJF justly attacked both Mayor Finch and Governor Malloy for removing the elected members of the BOE. This is her solution to the problem, the mayor will appoint the majority of the board members. Under the current system we have control of Democracy. Under her system we have a dictatorship. That is like if we elect a president and let him/her appoint the governors, and they in turn could appoint our mayors. Welcome to the New World Order. This was a real “Fabrizi” moment. Did she consult with her advisers before releasing this manifesto? She had better rethink her own think tank. In closing tc, I am not attacking her children. I only am asking what school they attended. Last week someone asked this very same question of Bill Finch. I don’t recall you defending him.

        0
        1. I understand you are not attacking her children but I feel where people’s kids go to school is out of bounds. I think MJF proved her commitment to the school system as listed in my earlier post.

          0
        2. Hold on Antitesto, MJF could be on to something here with the Chinese thing. The state is reducing the BPT school budget so offer the Chinese a chance to teach every kid in BPT as a cultural exchange type thing and the Chinese can throw in a few million and maybe build a couple of factories as well. MJF is on to something, follow the money ’cause it’s not here in Connecticut.

          0
  2. “He went behind the parent’s back”!!! Like the parents really give a shit or anybody else for that matter.
    67% dropout rate
    14 schools failing
    Kids three grades behind

    Finch did the best thing anybody could do by getting state help.

    0
  3. No different than Finch, dictator. No transparency, owning the BOE 5 to 4. MJ, call Gomes and beg him for a job. He is really for the people. All the people.

    0
    1. That’s great NEG and I hope your kids are well and successful, and I wish the other 33% are doing well. I hope whoever comes in can raise that 33% a lot.

      0
        1. “Well my time went so quickly, I went lickety-splickly out to my old ’55
          As I drove away slowly, feeling so holy, God knows, I was feeling alive.

          Now the sun’s coming up, I’m riding with Lady Luck, freeway cars and trucks,
          Stars beginning to fade, and I lead the parade
          Just a-wishing I’d stayed a little longer,
          Oh, Lord, let me tell you that the feeling’s getting stronger”

          Tom Waits

          0
  4. LG and Ray,
    Are you going to print the onslaught of rebuttals to this sham speech?
    Seriously, be fair. She says she will give back to the voters and then in a Finch move will choose a majority.
    You put up the speech, now print the heat. Her true dictator motives are clearly shown. She is NOT better than us voters, but she thinks so.

    0
      1. So throw out the baby with the bathwater. This guy talks out of both sides of his mouth. LOL. What a bullshit artist! So let’s tank democracy for a few bad years on the BOE. John Gomes looks better every day.
        Please tc, stay in MJF’s camp.

        0
  5. I strongly disagree with mayoral appointees forming the majority of the Board. That is the equivalent of the mayor controlling the board, which is pretty much what we have now. The entire board needs to be elected but the criteria for who is eligible needs to be tweaked. For instance, a certain number of the board need to actually have children in the schools. A certain number need to be educators. Possibly do away with districts and have the seats based on these criteria and the elections be citywide.

    The mayor should have input, of course, but this body should have no ties to City Hall. The mayor should attend meetings and demand accountability. The mayor and the board should work closely together, perhaps with the superintendent as the go-between, but must be kept independent of one another.

    0
  6. *** The mayor having more control over the BOE is not an option in a Dem city like Bpt. The BOE should be separate from the cityside politics and have their “own” transparent state budget. The city has failed & bailed the Bpt school system time & time again with the help of the BOE, city politics, parents, and school admin & staff. The school system is a reflection of the entire community in Bpt, which chooses to always find blame while looking the other way. This city has been in need of a good political & spiritual enema for a long time instead of living in the past! *** BACK TO THE FUTURE! ***

    0
  7. Mayor Bloomberg took control of the NYC BOE. He hired a Chancellor (Superintendent) who came in and in four very short years turned the NYC school system into a model of educational excellence.

    NYC’s dropout rate was similar to ours, 68%. Teacher quality was poor. No one wanted to be subjected to the meat grinder every day. Test scores were a joke. Those who managed to qualify for a diploma and graduate did not succeed in post secondary education. At any time, 40% of the teacher slots were unfilled. NYC actually resorted to importing teachers from India.

    Because Bloomburg is an exceptional administrator with absolutely no nefarious alliances such as the alliance Finch has with Testa and Timpanelli, he was able to accomplish what was necessary.

    Today, all teacher slots are filled and there are 5 on the waiting list for each vacancy. The dropout rate has plummeted to 32.28%. Scores have reached national recognition levels. Post secondary success is impressive. In other words, the NYC school system as revamped by Mayor Bloomberg’s leadership has brought that system to the level of productivity it should have maintained all along. Oh. Bloomberg maintained all of this accomplishment while actually slightly trimming the already bloated and waste-filled budget. Sound familiar?

    The moral of my story here is simple. Placing a BOE under the control of a mayor is not necessarily the right move. Placing the BOE under the control of a highly skilled, well motivated, objective-oriented mayor dedicated to education reform is the right answer.

    I believe Mary-Jane Foster is the right person to become mayor and to take charge of the BOE.

    0
    1. Show me the money! Show me the money!
      Folks, for all of the arguing about the makeup of a BOE, you keep forgetting the current and future dynamics of the system that is frankly more important at this moment in my opinion.
      One or two of us keep asking for (and the rest of you ignore for the most part) a final report after six years on the comprehensive audit of the school system. The “audit” has stopped and started several times and the public has not yet gotten value. Efficiency steps were not fully implemented. Steps to separate or integrate overlapping or non-communicating City and BOE systems have been taken but not fully. Way too much foot dragging to make the dollars produce effective action with efficient processes. And creating a system that is accountable to the citizen and accountable to the taxpayer would probably limit the political influence and jobs. And that is resisted in many ways.
      So 6 years later with Bridgeport, State of CT, and Bridgeport Regional Business Council funds invested, what do we know? And what is the deadline? Shameful? Certainly. Sad? Totally. Expensive? Absolutely.
      And for those of us who pay taxes in Bridgeport, remember CT taxpayers are paying 80% of our bill. If they ever get angry at our self-governance attempts, we can forget about how much our vote counts. Imagine if you were paying for 80% of something that was working the way our school system has, what would you be telling your suburban legislator? To increase the ECS funding? What do you think?
      Under our current system parents get a vote just like empty nester homes. Parents have a role in parent school organizations and always have. And parents have a role in creating a safe and nurturing home environment in which their kids can grow.
      What we need locally, statewide and nationally are some pragmatic, experienced, and energetic folks who can work in the middle of the playing field to make progress with the available funds. Lots of criticism will rain down, but unless you can get accurate info with which to make decisions, and get on with making them, the system stagnates, while the money still gets spent. And that is not fair to anyone, and that is not good for our land in the long term.
      I am looking for that pragmatic, energetic and experienced leader (or leaders), whether it be a newly appointed BOE or a special master with a reinstated (net of resigned members) Bridgeport BOE. Too many dynamics for me to take sides at this moment. But daily we get closer to school opening, and students are nervous. That is not positive for the coming school year.

      0
      1. Do you want to know why this report has never been completed and/or made public? Because it would result in transparency that would cost the politically connected their jobs!

        0
  8. I don’t think you want to compare Foster to Bloomberg. Another Republican-turned-Democrat. They refer to him as a dictator in New York. Now they can’t smoke outside in public there either.

    0
      1. I’m saying Bloomberg has overstepped his bounds and people are not happy about it. He got a charter revision so he could overcome term limits and run for a third term. Too much power in the hands of one person, no matter how well intentioned, is never a good thing.

        0
  9. Further, I believe Bloomberg abolished the Board of Ed altogether and there is only a chancellor who reports directly to the mayor. His first chancellor left to take a position with FOX News. The second one was a magazine editor friend whose kids went to private school in CT and who suggested birth control as a remedy to overcrowded schools. She lasted 6 weeks. It also came to light most of the gains in test scores over the years were a result of some creative accounting.

    In a democracy, the people can never relinquish control to one person no matter how well intentioned.

    0
  10. Can’t believe how many DTC members say I have to go Finch tonight but will vote Gomes in September. Pathetic what a dictatorship and fear does.

    0
    1. Oh Chosen 1, please tell us how many DTC members told you they are voting for Gomes come September. Such BS. Then after you tell us how many, then give us their names. Talk about Lennie letting utter BS on his website, your post is a prime example.

      0
    2. Is J Gomes seeking the endorsement? Is MJ Foster seeking the endorsement? Members of the town committee are expected to endorse candidates; if there is only one candidate he gets the endorsement.

      0
        1. Lennie, I ran some numbers but didn’t ask anyone to commit. So I may have to look at the primary. I really enjoy getting signatures especially citywide. It gives you a chance to talk to the voters face to face.

          0
      1. *** Any DTC member can vote for any of the candidates to be put on the consideration list for tonight, no? First & seconded nomination which then goes to a vote by the entire membership. Why the other candidates don’t have a DTC nomination is beyond me! Misery enjoys company and promises have been made! Time to change some members of the town committee come 2012. Sad part is many voters will vote for another 4 years of doom! *** It’s a mess, no? ***

        0
  11. New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg appointed Cathie Black, a publishing executive, to head the nation’s biggest school even though she did NOT have the certification requirements needed to do the job. Cathie Black had to step down as NYC schools chancellor after just 95 days on the job because of pressure from parents.

    0
  12. You want to win as challenger in an urban area, you need to have this formula: D x V x F > R
    D is Dissatisfaction with the current situation (WHY is this change necessary?)
    V is Vision of what is possible in the future (WHERE are we going?)
    F is First Steps that are achievable towards the vision (HOW do we get there?)
    R is Resistance to change

    The combination of D, V, and F must be greater than R.

    According to the author of this principle, Richard Beckhard, none of these elements can be taken and managed alone. It is the total that determines the overall success of the change effort. For example, just having dissatisfaction (D) is useless unless it is linked to a shared vision (V).
    In other words connect the current state (why should Finch be fired) to the desired state(hire me as your next mayor). Just thought I’d throw in pedagogy as opposed to the normal my candidate’s better than your candidate screeds on OIB.

    0
    1. This makes a lot of sense. Thank you for posting it. However, by virtue of this formula:

      MJF: One of the reasons Finch should be fired is because he usurped the will of the people by dismantling an entirely elected body and let the state take over. You should hire me instead and let me take over. I will appoint the majority of the members to that body, in effect doing away with the electoral process entirely.

      0
      1. Broad listening skills probably need a tuneup at this moment. If you have a child or grandchild attending public schools you are a stakeholder. If you are a volunteer providing time and talent on a regular basis for kids in the system you are a stakeholder. And if your tax payments are dear to you and you don’t wish to pay more than necessary, you also are a stakeholder in the City school system.
        Let’s see what Mary-Jane said. It seems to me she reiterated her criticism of the planned and rehearsed secret process by which Mayor Finch and Barbara Bellinger with the knowledge and agreement of State officials effectively killed all members of the local Board, by dint of calling a question that got a 6-3 vote to evaporate and let the State do its thing.
        Next I heard her say if that process works its way out, she would advise the appointment of a Special Master as in Winsted CT to work with a “BOE.” Not sure how that would work out at the moment but if it meets my criteria of experienced, energetic, fair-minded and professional I can live with this too.
        Then she went on to talk about convening a Charter Revision Committee, not a new concept to this City, and discussed the forming of an appointed/elected Board. That seems to have gotten the most blood boiling. Lots would need to happen before we ever got there. So many new ideas … but that’s what discussion in the public space is about in a democracy … and if you attack the person … face on publicly … or privately by getting them off a Board or commission … or removing them from Budget and Appropriations committee where their expertise and curiosity might reveal more information to the eyes and ears of the public than is healthy for the Mayor … so all this talk about dictatorship is a lament about where Mario and John have gotten us today, with a weak man in a strong Mayor structure. Sad but true.
        yellowdog dem posted an interesting formula for us to consider: it is up to the voters, not just us posters, to see if there is adequate dissatisfaction, if vision of a candidate runs to including all the people (rather than just those who need party jobs and will follow orders) and First Steps … and we are starting to hear some of those.
        tc–who really cares who I vote for? The fence your vision indicates I am perched on may instead be a roller coaster of individual judgements about multiple issues as to which candidate can actually measure up to the task. I have dissatisfaction, big time, with current people in place and structure and don’t think dollars are spent effectively on people working efficiently, etc. Several candidates clearly have vision. But voice needs to be given to that vision of First Steps to earn the vote, my vote or anyone’s vote. September is still a while off … hope the energy, vision and first steps keep rolling.

        0
        1. Thank you for your thoughtful analysis. According to Marshall Ganz, getting people to participate requires:
          Moving people (the electorate in BPT) from the right column to the left.
          Anger Vs Apathy
          Hope Vs Fear
          Urgency Vs Inertia
          Yes you can Vs Self Doubt
          Solidarity Vs Isolation

          0
  13. The Foster educational platform says the mayor will appoint based on a defined set of criteria like neighborhood, diversity, expertise, not political patronage jobs. When Charter Revision occurs, the criteria will be developed and put in the charter so no mayor can subvert it for his/her own purposes.

    BTW–Ms. Foster’s two children went to public schools when she lived in Easton.

    0
  14. Carolanne, please keep up your positive messages about John and his campaign, because I fear some of his supporters are not getting the idea (attract new supporters vs repelling those on the fence). He may or may not win but he will maintain his integrity and win the respect of many people in the community for any future political endeavors. Good luck in the next 50 days. It’s going to get nasty so watch out.

    0
    1. For your information, I am not a Gomes supporter. I am myself one of those on the fence and it has been the MJF supporters’ mean-spirited comments about all other candidates that has turned me off. This is actually the first time I’ve seen any comments on any stand taken by Ms. Foster and just because it is not well received does not mean we are all supporters of another candidate.

      You have one obviously biased commentator in Chosen 1 who comments day in and day out and sometimes barely even makes sense. Most of the rest of the commentators are Foster supporters who are more eloquent than Chosen 1 in putting down the competition, including Lennie who saw fit to belittle and berate another candidate’s radio ad.

      Ms. Foster apparently took a good amount of time to come up with this plan and I doubt this is the only place it is not being well received. Just because some of us don’t agree with it does not mean we have an alternate agenda.

      0
      1. OIB is not the real world. Nothing published on this site will change anyone else’s opinion but reasoned debate is appreciated. What each challenger and their supporters should be concentrating on is getting 2,000 signatures in the next two weeks. Bottom line, all that matters at the end of the day will be the turnout numbers at 8:01 on September 13th.

        0
      2. By the way I also believe some MJF supporters are out of line in defense of their candidate. I just wanted Carolanne to know she has a fan and is missed. Her intelligence and loyalty say a lot about John’s campaign.

        0
  15. The Kossuth Electric Co. of Bridgeport, Conn. received a contract from the U.S. Navy through the Massachusetts Institute of Technology during World War II, word has it, to work on certain electronic demagnification properties associated with RADAR or SONAR.

    Experiments were conducted in farm country in the North End of Bridgeport with the patriotic and secret consent of Mayor Jasper McLevy. The area was in the approximate location of what was once an old farm off Park Avenue that fell into the city’s hands by foreclosure.

    Results of the scientific experiments were never released. The work did involve lining up electronic transmission beams from the area to somewhere around the municipal airport, which was being operated by the Navy for national security purposes. In keeping with the classified nature of the studies, the conclusion of the war, and the renowned lack of curiosity of city natives for anything that did not have a dollar attached to it, the experiments were never revealed.

    An interesting meteorological phenomenon was observed, however, in the decades following. It seems certain areas of the North End painted “black” in radar readings, as if nothing were there. Additionally it was learned from the more sophisticated observations from computers operated by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, that there were fewer, if any, lightning strikes in the area.

    The federal study inadvertently was forwarded to the city’s Office of Development Administration as part of a rejection letter for increased employment funding for the Civil Defense Office. An official with the National Security Council, a Col. Oliver North, noted nobody could find the city anyway so not to worry.

    The meteorological “dead zone” for lightning strikes is most acute in areas west of Park Avenue, east of Amsterdam Avenue, south of Clark Street and north of Westfield Avenue, an area once described in a police story on burglaries in the Connecticut Post as “Stafford Springs.”

    Long story short, it is safe to attend the Democratic Town Committee meeting at Testo’s tonight because no matter what lies are told, no one will be struck by lightning because the restaurant is within the safety zone.

    0
  16. No amount of spin can undo what I have been saying. MJ is out of touch with the people; Linda McMahon trying to buy an election. Maybe if she went to a BOE meeting she wouldn’t want to appoint her board majority. And her dumb followers trying to get me to out scared DTC members voting for Gomes. MJ, you can have those pom-pom idiots.

    0
  17. Under the present system of selecting BOE members we really only have one choice and that’s the machine-endorsed candidates. Sure the Working Families party was able to get to good members on the BOE but with the numbers stacked against them they were like a voice(s) in the wilderness.
    We had 6 other people on the board who claimed they could not get the job done because of the other 3 negative people on the board. Where I went to school (Harding), 6 still is more than 3 when it comes to voting or anything else.
    There is a lot more vision in MJF’s platform than who will be on the board. When was the last time you heard a mayor say they will take the hit if the BOE fails?

    0
  18. Every mayor, 1st Selectman, City Comptroller or City Manager of all Cities and Towns in Connecticut are ex officio of all boards and commissions. Please tc, more bullshit, “When was the last time you heard a mayor say they will take the hit if the BOE fails?” When was the last time you took your meds?

    0
    1. Jimfox, you are like a little flea jumping from one side to the other, still pissed about a casino? I have never heard any mayor state they would take responsibility for the BOE. I took my meds this morning, I took anti-bullshit and anti-asshole medication so I could read posts from you and Chosen.

      0
  19. tc you are right about MJ’s First Steps approach. There were many comments showing what she intends and why.
    About money, she knows the ECS formula is broken. Look to her for going to Hartford, not like Bill to see old buddies and spout off about Bridgeport, never anticipating some of his remarks might come home to roost. And more importantly, look to her activities with not-for-profit boards who have multiple interests and funds to help Bridgeport, to bear future fruit for the City. She has credibility. When it comes to education where we are essentially funding only 20% of education expenses with local dollars, we need to have as many alternative sources of funding as possible. Where is Finch’s/Ramos’ grant pursuit and funds for education?
    By the way we are regional on so many issues and don’t realize it. I work on behalf of a food pantry program in Bridgeport regularly. Many of our funds and contributed foodstuffs come from outside the City as do some of our volunteers. I have never heard any of our recipients ask if the food or the money supporting the pantry comes from outside of Bridgeport. Just saying … we all have to work together, don’t we? For food, housing, justice, jobs, education and progress???

    0
  20. The Working Family Party now has one choice and it’s Gomes. They are about fair elections and backing their people who were booted, Maria and Sauda. MJ and Finch are for choosing their own board or state run. Gomes Sept 13.

    0
    1. Mojo,
      If WFP is smart enough to back the first minority mayor in Bpt history and first Cape Verdean in US history, they’d be back in a big way.

      0
  21. On the show this evening, with increasing discontent and with what looks like some sort of uprising in the Park City, we focus on Hartford. The new power center for Bridgeport, at least for the BOE so far. Watch out members of city council or city commissions, if you ask too many questions or do an FOI, Hartford could be next. To discuss Hartford issues, special guest at 8pm, a former Connecticut state legislator and lawyer.

    Then we will discuss the $350,000,000 30-year bond issued by the city issued in Aug 2000 and the topic of short-term gain for long-term pain. If you understand bonds or are curious about what our underlying bond for city ratings is, tune in, around 8:20pm. I need some help understanding this general obligation muni bond for pensions, so if you know about this, please call in.

    After that, local history … Bridgeport, the city of invention and innovation, in which Charles, the renowned historian discusses ‘first in flight’ Gustave Whitehead.

    Schedule for coming shows on Bridgeport Now TV:
    August 2: Mary-Jane Foster
    August 9: Jeff Kohut

    Providing outreach to the public on Channel 88 and streaming on Soundviewtv.org

    0
  22. Mojo, how has Working Families done? The vote for the Registrar is next year, at which point there would be three political parties in Bridgeport.

    0
    1. *** Is Working Families running a full slate in the upcoming elections this fall and next year for town committee seats? BOE is done for now, no? *** Time’s a ticking! ***

      0
  23. *** If the shoe fits *** Only (!) 7 deadly sins holding the city of Bpt. back … 1. Gluttony of overeating politicians, family & friends, 2. Greed of money, power and what have you done for me lately, 3. Pride from memories of the past, 4. Lust, the need to screw taxpayers, 5. Sloth, many city workers who don’t cut the mustard, 6. Envy, good telling jealous city workers, 7. Wrath, vindictive political payback. *** FORGETABOUTIT ***

    0
  24. I’m sorry tc but I for one don’t agree with you on this; it is the public’s business to know where her kids went to school, she is running for mayor for crying out loud!!! That’s not off limits. It’s not a Democrat or Republican issue, it is a public issue. We the voters want to know would she send her kids to the Bpt public school system. Nothing is wrong if she says no, I can’t blame her but to say the public can’t ask, that has to be a joke. You make Bill Finch look good by saying that’s none of the public’s business … all I can do is smh.

    0
    1. donj, No problem disagreeing but she lived in Easton and that’s where they went to school. Here is my earlier post on her volunteer work in Bridgeport education.
      MJF was the co-chair of Success by Six for almost 7 years. It is a national United Way initiative where the driving motivation is bringing local resources to bear to make sure every child, beginning at birth is ready for school. Serving on the Board of Teach For America, I have been an angel to the Columbus School for pretty much the last 7 years. I’ve watched a school where, at one point, 65% of their kids don’t speak English at home, 11% of their kids are learning disabled, the district is the poorest school district in the state with the highest crime rate of any school district in the state.
      I would challenge both Gomes & Finch to show their record for volunteering in our educational system.

      0
  25. *** Where her kids went to school back in the day doesn’t matter, no? It’s a parent’s choice & duty to look out for their kids’ “best educational interest” without it affecting his or her personal opinion on education improvements in the town or city where they live. What’s next, where they worship or not? *** FORGETABOUTIT ***

    0
    1. Chosen 1,
      I am still trying to figure out why you bothered to use so many names to address us readers on OIB. What was your purpose in hiding the fact you created 40 identities to keep secret the fact there were only one or two people behind the masks? Was there a positive reason for doing this? If so I would like to hear it, and I can imagine I am not the only one.
      Do you think it was an honest, admirable or ethical activity? Or do you think it does not matter to you and therefore it shouldn’t be anyone else’s business?
      I am happy some surveillance on the site discovered what I would term “blogging abuse.” I mean, most of us use one nom de plume and many of us get outed anyway. But what is the purpose of 40 attempts at misdirection on the subject of one’s identity? Seriously? Do you hear voices? Have you been diagnosed with multiple personalities? Or just enjoy putting one over on other people? Maybe you’d like to tell us some of the names you used? Seriously? Hope you can find your voice on this one!

      0
    1. Why wouldn’t that shithead be well received? In a room full of thieves, the chief thief shines. Let him come to a MJF rally and see how well he is received.

      0
    1. Ye,s I believe there is better than a 50% chance he will run. I think a lot is going to depend on the primary results. If Finch loses the primary Joe may reconsider. If Finch scrapes by and just wins the primary I believe Joe will get into the race. If Finch pulls a blowout (which I doubt), Joe would think long and hard.
      I NEVER HEARD AN INCUMBENT’S SPEECH SO DRAB AND OUT OF TOUCH.

      0

Leave a Reply