The Deficit Factor, When Finch Lost The Primary He Checked Out As Mayor

On September 16th something occurred for the first time in city history, an incumbent mayor had been defeated in a primary. Know what happened after that? Shock for Bill Finch and his inner circle of government payroll advisers. And after that? A lot of the people responsible for checking the budget had checked out emotionally including the mayor. And something like that can contribute to the current budget deficit as well as other factors following passage of an election-year budget that had no tax increase.

When Bill Finch became mayor in 2007 he inherited a budget deficit from John Fabrizi. In Finch’s first budget, following a promise on the campaign trail to cut taxes $600, he ended up raising them that much for many homeowners. In 2012, following his reelection, Finch tangled with an election-year budget deficit from 2011 and answered it by proposing a tax increase of more than $400 for the average homeowner that was scaled back to about $225 by the time the City Council was done with the budget.

What if Finch had been reelected to another term? He’d have said little about the budget deficit that was the result of election-year positioning. Then another tax increase would have followed. And so it goes.

Mayor Joe Ganim is trying to trot out as much bad budget news as possible in part to make it clear he did not cause this deficit. He’s trying to show he’s fixing the problem caused by Finch.

One of the many expenditures Ganim and financial advisers cited the other night as out of control was public safety and Public Facilities overtime accounts. The current budget year began July 1 in the thick of Finch’s reelection. Ganim was kicking Finch’s fanny on a regular basis following a spike in violent crime. Ganim opened a campaign headquarters/police substation manned by volunteer police supporters in the troubled Trumbull Gardens area. Police Chief Joe Gaudett announced that was against department rules for cops to man. Finch then announced, hey, we’ll open a real police precinct up there. But to do that costs money including an increase in overtime. Police presence was increased in Trumbull Gardens and other areas of the city. That increases overtime.

Finch, in an election year,  commenced an ambitious street-paving program, promoted park improvements with signage all over the city to remind voters. That costs money and an increase in overtime.

As the primary race tightened a prevailing attitude set in, let’s just do this, pay for it and we’ll deal with it later after we win reelection. Ah, the pleasures of failure. Finch lost. Finch stammered around in disbelief telling anyone willing to listen to him he could not understand how the voters threw him under the bus for Joe Ganim.

As one voter said on primary day when asked why he chose Ganim over Finch: I’d rather vote for the effective felon than the ineffective liar.

One of the budget casualties of Finch losing was he checked out as the chief executive and some key advisers checked out emotionally to keep an eye on the shop. Their days were numbered starting from mid September. For the next two and a half months they mailed it in until leaving office Nov. 30.

But not without Finch landing a final payout of roughly $30,000 split between a retroactive pay raise and unused vacation days that by the way had not been budgeted and contributed to the deficit, according to Ganim financial advisers.

0
Share

29 comments

  1. *** The new headlines read “Panic in City Hall by the Finch Admin” after the Dem primary loss! Then there was the last-minute idea to run as an independent and mad dash to get the paperwork in! “Oh no”! It may be too late, let’s see if one of the other candidates drops out and gives Finch their political spot so he can stay in the race? Oh shit, lot’s to think about, let’s waste taxpayer money and take this issue to court, no? Then the political gods send down their final message and decision to the Finch camp; “YOU’RE DONE, HOMES. TIME TO FACE THE MUSIC AND BACK FOSTER!” *** WHOOPS ***

    0
  2. Somehow, someway, what Finch and his Finchettes did has to be able to be criminally charged, there had to be laws broken, if not then the laws need to be changed.

    0
    1. Dream on. Creative accounting need only be justified by a reasonableness test. It does not matter if there is a journal entry reclass; an expense is an expense and the bottom line remains (if in fact the golf carts were classified as an expense, which they should not have been). Criminal intent would be a bear to prove.

      Take a wrench to the books, put a great financial mechanic on it, and move on.

      0
    1. Look at the use of the word “aggressive” by a regime in referring to tax collections. It is supposed to make those folks paying 100% taxes (no abatements or other waivers) ON TIME EACH TIME satisfied the City is operating correctly.
      But look at it with a different scope. Aggressive tax collections of WPCA, auto and City property taxes have caused foreclosure or loss of property actions in too many cases without the City recovering any funds. That was explored and shown in City Council hearings last year. Then there is the question of how property owners in some sections of the City can have taxes due outstanding for years where “aggressive” translates into months before tax liens. How does that work? For the taxpayer? For the City? And for the lawyers who are part of the process, ready with fees to assess before doing one hour of work? Interesting? Or disgusting? Perhaps we ought to look at how that works. Open, accountable, and transparent? NOT!!!

      Let’s look for a JUST system of tax collection that sets out the duty and responsibilities for taxpayers but also provides some HEART and reasonable relief in terms of time for obligations to be settled with the City. And finally how about adjusting the system so actions that will bring the City no funds (though private parties may gain) practically speaking, will stop? Time will tell.

      0
      1. Aggressive doesn’t have to mean heartless. I would refer to the word “process” or “SCHEME.” What you’re saying is some city taxpayers are being targeted for “Aggressive” tax collections practices, while others are not? So wouldn’t you say it’s not the “AGGRESSIVENESS” of all the parties involved but rather a scheme, not the process by those who are carried it out in collusion with those who are put in charge of protection? In the words of Leon Ivey Jr, “I never crossed a man that didn’t deserved it.”
        www .youtube.com/watch?v=YanWvvLJLQw

        0
      2. John Marshall Lee // Dec 18, 2015 at 8:55 am
        To your post
        Well said, JML.
        I hold the conviction life is going to become better for Bridgeport’s long-suffering residents and taxpayers.
        Continue your good work.

        0
  3. “And after that? A lot of the people responsible for checking the budget had checked out emotionally including the mayor.”

    Come on Lennie, where have you been? You of all people should be fully aware the prior administration and quite a few City Council members had checked out politically–not so much emotionally a very long time ago. They were so out of it, by default they failed to read the writing on the wall. The only writing on the wall Bill Finch looked at were of the alleged crossed-out days left on the walls in a federal prison cell by the man who took him down.

    Did anyone notice 25% of the council members were absent? The first deficit or shortfall McCarthy should try to fix is the low attendance by council members during the most critical period of their elected duty.

    “I’m in a state of shock,” Councilwoman Denese Taylor-Moye, co-chairwoman of the Budget Committee, said Wednesday night. “Why didn’t anyone see this? This is mind-blowing.”

    Councilwoman Moye could have taken the time to explain why she didn’t see this. Instead of looking at the situation as “mind-blowing,” she should start looking at it as stipend-blowing. Let’s see if the Budget Committee cuts the stipend 70%. Keep in mind it is a violation of the City Charter to accept any funds derived from the city’s coffers as compensation for serving on the city council.

    0
    1. Joel, you may remember when we served on the Council we received a modest stipend intended to be used by members to enhance contact and communication with constituents. We were required to submit to the Finance Dept. how the funds were used in addition to providing receipts. If an expenditure was deemed not council related, that amount would be deducted from the next stipend payment. I’m wondering who changed that process. In addition to lowering the amount of the stipend, the reporting should be implementing again. This should be done by resolution, and voted on by the full council. Let’s see who has the nerve to do that.

      0
  4. Sorry, Lennie. I’m not buying the early check-out time theory.
    I am continuing to lay this problem at the feet of the City Council and its apparently incompetent Council President.
    Starting with John Fabrizi, then Andres Ayala and finally Tom McCarthy, the role of Council President has morphed into a member of the mayor’s staff.
    They all did the mayor’s bidding, did not challenge the mayor in any way and approved his budgets without seriously challenging any parts of it.
    Even when they made a public stink over a potential tax increase, they turned to Sherwood to ask him how could he lower the increase.
    And what did these three stooges all have in common?
    City employees. You can try to split hairs and say Fabrizi and Ayala were employees of the BOE but the bottom line was they worked for the city of Bridgeport.
    Come on, folks. It’s as clear as day.

    0
  5. Here is the quote of the year from Denese Taylor-Moye. A sitting member of the B & A committee.
    “I’m in a state of shock,” Councilwoman Denese Taylor-Moye, co-chairwoman of the Budget Committee, said Wednesday night. “Why didn’t anyone see this? This is mind-blowing.” She has to be kidding, she saw all the presentations and made a few comments and that was it. Not one department budget was cut by the B & A committee.
    Ask Denese Taylor-Moye how she spent her stipend money. If she won’t tell you, let me. It was for food shopping at Stop & Shop many, many times.
    The town committee keeps nominating these incompetents and we keep getting screwed because they are too dumb to do the job.

    0
  6. The “Good Old Boys” club will be ending an era in Public Facilities. Just a few more dinosaurs to round up. One of them won’t be an easy one. Nevertheless, time to say GOODBYE!

    0
  7. Ron Mackey and Donald Day, take a look at the new graduating State Police Officers. The results are the same as we get here in Bridgeport. There was one guy from Bridgeport and one from New Haven, the rest are from the ‘burbs and except for one person I could make out one black male. The cities continue to get screwed.

    0
    1. Bob,
      Why are you looking for another party? Unhappy with the one you joined? Or perhaps just finding things tough to digest? Rick Torres spoke out for his District last year as well as for taxpayers all over the City on important issues. Give him a break and a rest, maybe. He will reflect on his takeaways, provide business services to his neighborhood in an evenhanded manner, employing a diverse group of people many of whom learn and earn the skills and attitudes to go on to positions that appear more attractive, and Rick and Michele also are responsible taxpayers.

      What spleen has you accusing him of hiding? Why don’t you come to Harborview for some fudge or croissants and sweeten your view or disposition. Perhaps you have a real question appropriate to the City in late 2015? Time will tell.

      0
      1. JML, are you for real? Where are the voices of the Republican Party here in Bridgeport? Their chairman was so concerned about people coming from Syria to America, well where is his voice and his party’s voice about these issues, or do they only come out at election time?

        0
        1. Ron, you know I am for real. What is not real is mugging weakness. The Republican Party in Bridgeport has no practical power. They did at one time. They lost it. Case closed.

          Bob Walsh was baiting Rick Torres who did more in the last Council as a single Council person to question and probe the administration activities than anyone else in my opinion. And now you are talking about someone whom you do not name who used his position to state opinions that have little if any bearing on local issues, of which there are many.

          It seems to me anyone, Democrat, Republican, Independent, Working Families Party or unaffiliated who learns about local governance, stays informed and uses their heart, mind and voice to help guide our City forward should be celebrated as a person. We are not in high school where one issue was too much to consider and popularity was the deal.

          So anytime there is a slow news day, or you need a cheap target, pick on Bridgeport Republicans. What about the notorious Republican sheriff who pleaded guilty this week? Good for the brand?

          Bully pulpit??? And lots of Line A agreement? But what do you say about the misuse of our Democratic brand that occupies Line A?? And has occupied Line A through successive elections? Isn’t there enough on the broad front of City governance that could fill your responses rather than jumping on the most vulnerable? Or were you being “issue oriented?” Time will tell.

          0
          1. JML, Rick Torres and his supporters, friends and the Republican Party here are still here and they made the decision to have Rick give up the one elected position they had on the City Council to gamble on Rick becoming mayor when they truly knew he couldn’t win. So does that mean they sit on the sidelines until the next election? There are a number of Republicans whom I might disagree with from time to time but whom I respect like Tom White and Joe Borges, just to name a few. Republicans should understand Bridgeport is more than just the 130th.

            0
  8. Andy, the question that needs to be asked is why is Bridgeport hiring outside the city. Bridgeport residents aren’t being hired for the State Police, aren’t being hired in police and fire departments in the suburbs, yet two out of every three who is hired for the fire department are from the suburbs.

    Andy, believe it or not Ron and I would like to see blacks hired for the police and fire, but we prefer to see ALL those hired to be Bridgeport residents. Can you imagine how many millions of dollars are leaving this city every week going to uplift the suburbs? Someone has to stop this madness if Bridgeport is ever going to recover financially.

    0
  9. Donald, I agree with you on this matter 100%. We have a civil service director from Stratford and the head of the civil service commission lives in Trumbull.
    The major obstacle is many of these suburban whites come to Bridgeport and have to deal with our minority population. They know nothing of their customs or use of the language. Here is an example and if anybody is upset by swearing, stop reading. If a kid calls a white cop from the suburbs a mother f’r, this suburban cop takes it personal. I hope Ganim changes the entry level for candidates.

    0
  10. Let’s start by replacing the members of the Civil Service Commission, many of whose terms appear to have expired. Next schedule a test to permanently fill the position of personnel director, which is been filled by a provisional appointee for several years even though the charter limits such appointments to 120 days. Then start reversing the actions the Civil Service Commission has taken to remove positions from the (tested) classified service during the Finch/Dunn era.

    0
    1. Phil, the entire Bridgeport Civil Service Commission has said nothing and has done nothing in their position to protect the City Charter while they are working alongside the personnel director who has been in that position for years in violation of the 120-day provision in the City Charter and never calling for a test for the personnel director.

      0
  11. Oh Phil, speak to my heart. That Civil Service position was given to Dunn without any prior experience whatsoever in that field of expertise and he has been there for seven years even though like you said, “the charter limits provisional appointments for 120 days.”

    When he is gone then I’ll say Bridgeport is getting better every day.

    0
  12. *** All the boards and commissions need to be reviewed and new members picked from all the districts along with ethic diversity and a variety of backgrounds made up of men, women, young and old. ***

    0
  13. None of this should surprise anyone. We all knew Finch had a lot to hide. Why else would Adam “Pecker” Wood keep such a tight lid on information released to the press? We also knew Ganim was going to roll up every rug in Morton Government Center to show the people of the city of Bridgeport all the dirt and sleaze that had been swept under them by Bill Finch and the rest of the hee-haw gang.

    Ganim’s dirty laundry is a matter of public record. The only thing we don’t know is what happened to the cases of French wine.

    0

Leave a Reply