Newton’s Redemption–Gomes’ Steady Eddie–Ayala’s Fresh Face–What Say You?

OIB, based on input from readers, has submitted five questions each to the State Senate campaigns of incumbent Ed Gomes, party-endorsed Ernie Newton and State Rep. Andres Ayala. The three are locked in a competitive Aug. 14 Democratic primary that is the most watched legislative race in the state. We hope to receive responses early next week for your review. Have you already made up your mind about this race? If so, for whom will you vote or support in case you cannot vote in the race? (But why should that stop you from voting?)

Running on a platform of Redemption and Opportunity, Newton is the lightning rod in this race. The self-proclaimed Moses of his peeps tells voters, many in need of second chances, there’s no redemption without opportunity and he’s someone who can create that opportunity if he’s returned to the State Senate seat now occupied by Gomes. You can question the depth of Newton’s support, but there’s no questioning the passion that exists within his support. His Barnum Avenue headquarters is buzzing with campaign workers and volunteers. Newton has a strong base of support in his East End home neighborhood. He promises come primary day he will prove his support extends well beyond the East End.

Gomes operatives believe the incumbent has been a steady hand in the Senate. He’s reliable, honest and always shows up to legislative meetings, they say, even when not in the best health. Gomes, at 76, appears fit after a series of health issues last fall sidelined him in the hospital and then convalescence for a few months. He returned for the start of the legislative session in February and was a constant presence. There’s no lying in Gomes. If he likes you he tells you. If he doesn’t like you he tells you. If his supporters have a criticism it’s he’s not the kind of guy to wave pompoms about his voting record. Gomes, as an incumbent, has not had a tough race. He has one now and campaign hands must wave those pompoms on his behalf to educate voters about his record.

Ayala, although a member of the State House for six years and prior to that the City Council president during the John Fabrizi mayoral years, is the fresh face of the race. Newton and Gomes have represented the district for the past nine years. Ayala brings to the table a State House legislative base, albeit in the lowest-performing turnout area of the city, as well as a number of political operatives from Mayor Bill Finch’s political campaign. One of them is former State Rep. Americo Santiago who knows his way around this district. He was a  leading Bridgeport campaign staffer for Dannel Malloy’s gubernatorial run in 2010 and then joined Finch’s 2011 reelection after flirting with his Democratic opponent Mary-Jane Foster.

Santiago was circumspect on the phone the other day chatting about the race. He does not dismiss the chances of Newton and Gomes, but if the campaign work continues to progress for Ayala he believes Bridgeport will have the first Latino to serve the State Senate seat. By Bridgeport standards so far most campaign operatives say the race has been generally cordial. That could change in the final four weeks or so.

The district covers about 70 percent of Bridgeport from portions of the North End straight down to the South End and the entire eastern sections of the city. It also includes a piece of western Stratford. New pockets of voters, those who moved into the district or have been redistricted into it, could decide this race. They live on the Upper East Side and vote at Hooker and Beardsley School precincts. Democrats Anthony Musto and prior to that Bill Finch represented them in the State Senate prior to recent redistricting. In addition, Bridgeport now has several dozen new voters living downtown in a variety of new apartment and condo units. They’re young, active professionals–teachers, nurses, bankers, accountants, artists–who vote at City Hall. How will they vote?

What about those Stratford voters? And yes, of course, OIB has chronicled the flood of absentee ballot application into the Town Clerk’s Office. Just a few dozen votes could decide this race.

0
Share

14 comments

  1. I believe in the political lexicon Americo pimped himself off to the highest bidder in last year’s mayoral election; typical of Americo’s political past.

    0
  2. Support is a one-way street when it comes to Chris Caruso. All the years Ed Gomes was at Caruso’s side and the Big Wave sat on his fat ass while the little people ran around to get him elected. That’s the last time I’ll ever vote for the Massimo Kid.

    0
  3. Yeah sure, Ernie. All sinners deserve redemption and 2nd and 3rd and 4th and 5th chances. So do you. The fact you are a convicted felon who has embarrassed this great city on more than one occasion apparently is not a precluding factor as you seek the same office from which you stole from your constituents. You will probably win the primary and the general election. Then what? You can’t redeem stupid.

    0
    1. Ernest Newton is running on a platform of redemption and opportunity. Redemption and opportunity for whom? Ernest Newton, that’s who.

      It is painfully obvious Ernest does not have the best interest of the constituents of the district or the City in mind or heart. If so, he would not be running. This is all about Ernie feeding his starving, over-bloated ego. This is about Ernie trying to save face.

      The “redemption” Ernie speaks of is redemption for himself, not for the district, not for the City. The “opportunity” Ernie speaks of is the opportunity for him to secure a steady income and health benefits, including a pension, from the State.

      Ernest Newton is a selfish, self-serving man who has embarrassed himself and the city of Bridgeport for far too long.

      0
  4. Simply put, the felon known as Newton violated the public trust. He served his time in jail (as did the felon known as Ganim) and I don’t know if he paid back what he stole or if he paid his fine.
    Redemption, however, doesn’t mean getting a second meal at the trough from which you stole.
    While Ed Gomes is the incumbent, I’m a firm believer in term limits. Because of that my vote would go to Andres Ayala. Both are evenly matched.

    0
      1. Howdy … How are you and is my analysis to your satisfaction? BTW I was vilified on another comment in regards to an obscure incident four years ago by someone named “anna” who brought up something known to very few.

        0
  5. With the bad taste still in my mouth about Mr. Rowland collecting a pension because of his service to the state my vote will go to either Mr. Ayala or Mr. Gomes. I am leaning toward Ayala, however. I think Mr. Newton is trying to weasel his way back onto the state payroll, and therefore its benefits system (I’m sure there would be some way to bridge his time from previous service).

    0
  6. *** 1. To all the State Senate candidates past, present and future, what have you done for the 23rd district and Bpt lately or hope to do? 2. Also, why is the entire Bpt state delegation as a whole always been considered to be one of the weakest and most ineffective in the State Capital? 3. What makes you different and better qualified than your opponent? *** INQUIRING VOTERS WOULD LIKE TO KNOW. ***

    0
  7. *** Newton’s political song for the campaign is “Redemption Song” by Bob Marley. Gomes’ campaign song is “That’s Life” by F.S. “Old Blue Eyes.” And Ayala’s campaign song is”Moving on Up” by Curtis Mayfield. Will any of them be able to get some “SATISFACTION” after it’s all said and done? *** TIME WILL TELL ***

    0

Leave a Reply