Log in Register


 Saturday April 21, 2018

 HCA Reg. Num. HCA.0000908

Ultimate Family Care Elle Sera Downtown Cabaret TheatreBridgeport Public Library
OIB the book

Stevens Quicklane

The Plastic Factory

Greater Bridgeport Transit

Connecticut Characters

OIB Classifieds

Trattoria ’A vucchella

Newton Scheduled For Court Appearance To Respond To State Charges

January 31st, 2013 · 2 Comments · City Politics, Law Enforcement, State Politics

Former State Senator Ernie Newton is scheduled to be back in court Thursday (today) to officially enter a not guilty plea following a criminal complaint from state investigators accusing him of falsifying $500 in campaign contributions to qualify for roughly $80,000 in public campaign funds for his 2012 State Senate race. Darnell Crosland, Newton’s attorney, had been busy with a murder trial that prevented him from appearing with Newton at a January 17 hearing in Hartford.

According to the state’s warrant, Newton was $500 short of the $15,000 he needed to raise in private contributions to qualify for the Citizens Election Program grant as part of his quest to regain the State Senate seat he was forced to relinquish following corruption charges in 2005. Newton had five campaign workers sign cards stating they had contributed to the campaign when in fact they had not, the warrant states. Newton finished second in a three-way primary won by Andres Ayala.

Newton’s lawyer says the state historically has handled these kinds of cases as civil matters, not criminal actions. He says the state’s allegations “can’t be farther from the truth. He didn’t steal any money, he applied for money, they approved it and he ran a legitimate campaign.”

Newton, a media magnet, hasn’t said much publicly about the case other than he looks forward to his day in court.


Tags: ··

2 Comments so far ↓

  • Antitestoo

    Is it true Ernie was set up by the SEEC?

  • Mojo

    *** If Newton were $500 short from the beginning towards his $15,000 goal, how did he qualify for the $80,000 elections fund? Don’t you have to show proof you have the $15,000 in a legit-type bank account first, along with a campaign treasurer to then be verified by the SEEC? Seems like checking campaign money IOU’s after the fact due to worker complaints is a bit “late” and “whack!” This has nothing to do with race but does have something to do with being an ex-felon! *** IT GETS BETTER, NO? ***

Leave a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.