One of Ganim’s advisers is said to have freaked out when the dead squirrel smell got stronger. A source told me Danny Roach freaked out and ordered police to look for a dead body as they suspected Bill Finch was setting up Ganim again.
Made some time to listen to Mayor Ganim chat about multiple issues and “moving the City forward,” but I still do not hear what his priorities are, do you?
Listening closely to the budget comments and the refinancing of General Obligation Bonds, I heard the number $60 Million for the first time (not specified at B&A meeting in January previous to CC vote). At that meeting I heard the $3 Million assist to the current projected deficit of $20 Million the bond refunding would help. I also remember another $3 Million would come in the second or third year out. However, in the Rotary presentation I believe the Mayor mentioned $3 Million or more this year, $4 Million next year and another $3 Million later? Overstated future results or an expanded project or what? When it come to a press release, the 1-19-16 “Ganim Praises City Council Vote Approving Refinance of 2016 General Obligation Bonds–Saves Taxpayers More Than $3 Million” is still accurate whether surplus is $6 Million or $10 Million, but failure to include financial amounts in City Agendas or resolutions leaves people unsure and unable to accurately compare. For instance the $60 Million quote from the Mayor shows up nowhere in the publicity. Are we getting better in OATH? Time will tell.
One of Ganim’s advisers is said to have freaked out when the dead squirrel smell got stronger. A source told me Danny Roach freaked out and ordered police to look for a dead body as they suspected Bill Finch was setting up Ganim again.
Made some time to listen to Mayor Ganim chat about multiple issues and “moving the City forward,” but I still do not hear what his priorities are, do you?
Listening closely to the budget comments and the refinancing of General Obligation Bonds, I heard the number $60 Million for the first time (not specified at B&A meeting in January previous to CC vote). At that meeting I heard the $3 Million assist to the current projected deficit of $20 Million the bond refunding would help. I also remember another $3 Million would come in the second or third year out. However, in the Rotary presentation I believe the Mayor mentioned $3 Million or more this year, $4 Million next year and another $3 Million later? Overstated future results or an expanded project or what? When it come to a press release, the 1-19-16 “Ganim Praises City Council Vote Approving Refinance of 2016 General Obligation Bonds–Saves Taxpayers More Than $3 Million” is still accurate whether surplus is $6 Million or $10 Million, but failure to include financial amounts in City Agendas or resolutions leaves people unsure and unable to accurately compare. For instance the $60 Million quote from the Mayor shows up nowhere in the publicity. Are we getting better in OATH? Time will tell.
Surprisingly dull.
I’m leaving viewing this until the weekend. But this may take up so much time I may not have time for the long-talked-about cup of coffee with JML.
We may never hear from you again! 🙂