Foster: Prioritize City Residents For Public Safety Employment

Foster, Swain
Mary-Jane Foster, left, door-knocked last week on the West Side with City Councilwoman Trish Swain, right.

Democratic mayoral candidate Mary-Jane Foster, citing low staffing levels, writes that tax credits and academic achievement should be among the incentives utilized to attract more city residents to public safety employment. “By embracing change and transforming the way we recruit, hire and train our police force, we will become the community partners we need to be, ensure the safety of our residents and officers and look back at this time with pride, as we place ourselves on the right side of history.” Commentary follows:

Fifty years ago, this nation was navigating a tumultuous path toward civil rights; its leaders met with resistance at every turn, sometimes violent. The pursuit of civil rights sparked riots in cities throughout the country. Many people feared change and fought against it vehemently. But change, as Robert Kennedy once said, was the “only path with the promise of saving our cities, the only path with the potential of bringing forth the resources needed for the task ahead.” Today, we applaud that change and look back on those who led it as courageous visionaries.

I thought of this as I watched the news coverage of the riots in Baltimore–the latest violent manifestation of urban injustice.

Bridgeport has not been sheltered from the socioeconomic trends that, in part, led to the unrest in Baltimore. In fact, the two cities share significant similarities. Each is more than 18 percent behind the average U.S. city in family income and 20 percent behind in home ownership. Unemployment is high.

Those statistics are significant, but they are numbers–sterile. We need to think of them in terms of the reality: poverty. Thought of in this way, those numbers don’t just tell us where we are compared to other cities, they set the stage for what’s happening in places like Ferguson and Baltimore.

The events in Baltimore should have been a catalyst for real reform in cities around the nation, especially here in Bridgeport. Instead, they’ve been met with empty words and the obligatory “embracing diversity” photo shoot. Rather than seizing the opportunity to make substantial policy changes, our “leadership” seized the opportunity to make self-serving political moves.

The actions we need to take respect both our citizens and our police force. It is unacceptable that the city of Bridgeport has the lowest police force staffing levels in memory. It is unfair to the people who live here and unfair to the people we ask to protect us. The citizens of Bridgeport are left vulnerable and the police are asked to do more than is possible.

Despite the inaction of the current administration, this problem is not without a solution. We can regularly recruit and do it in a timely manner that avoids crisis. We can pay our officers adequately to attract and retain a high-quality, dedicated police force. We can offer–and demand–training that prepares them for the work they do. Most importantly, we can develop mutual trust and use this crisis as an opportunity for real dialogue and meaningful to all change for all.

Addressing the makeup of our public safety professionals will be a chief objective of my tenure as mayor. First, we must encourage more young Bridgeport residents to join the force. A career in public service is a stable and lucrative one. The entry level civil service exam–a prerequisite for the police department–should be dismissed for students attaining a certain level of academic achievement in Bridgeport schools, paving the way for increased local applicants.

Meaningful preferences for hiring Bridgeport residents must also be implemented and utilized. Property tax credits for police officers, firefighters, EMT and teachers who reside in Bridgeport will attract committed and talented people to these positions.

Another measure I will prioritize is the establishment of the Office of the Public Safety Ambassador to serve as a liaison between the community and the police department. The Office will be designed to provide detailed and insightful context with the current complaint system in order to improve understanding and outcomes across the board.

To further improve transparency and accessibility, I would call on the Police Commission to move its monthly meetings. Whether by design or by default, the current location separates the public from the decision making of its police department, and should be moved from the chief’s office to a more open and welcoming area such as City Hall.

With the attention of the nation on the struggle of inner-city residents, we have an opportunity. By embracing change and transforming the way we recruit, hire and train our police force, we will become the community partners we need to be, ensure the safety of our residents and officers and look back at this time with pride, as we place ourselves on the right side of history.

Addressing the socioeconomic conditions that fuel confrontation with the police will be a long-term, strategic and cooperative effort that takes place over the course of my term as mayor. But the state of our community’s relationship with its police force cannot wait. As a candidate for mayor, I have the experience, the dedication and the plan to embrace the changes necessary to make it happen.

0
Share

107 comments

  1. To quote Stevie A, EXCELLENT!!!
    There is more meat in that commentary than anything Ganim has said thus far.
    And as far as Finch goes, his meat tends to repeat.

    0
    1. Bob, I am glad I left a very positive soundbite for you to repeat with joy. So few of your posts have any positive essence whatsoever. For you to say excellent I say yaaaaaay!

      0
  2. This is what I expect for my kind of candidate. New, exciting, novel ideas about making Bridgeport better instead of merely rehashing the past.
    Think of this; bypassing the old-school civil service testing for students of Bridgeport Public School who attain a high level of educational achievement.
    And it also puts more pressure on the Bridgeport Schools to perform and produce.
    This is something that can excite me rather than garbled 10=second sound bites.

    0
    1. I totally disagree high-achieving BPS should bypass all civil service testing. If they are truly high achievers they should have no problem taking the test.

      Having different standards for some Bridgeport residents versus others Bridgeport residents is exactly something an elitist would propose.

      Don’t top law school students still have to take the same exam to obtain their law license as a poor-performing law student? Doesn’t every BPS student have to take the same written exam to obtain a drivers license? And don’t they have to take the same SAT to gain admittance to college?

      This is exactly what elitists believe in. Divide members of the community into classes based on money, education, ability, etc. with the top tier receiving special consideration over those in the lower/bottom tiers.

      0
      1. Words are important to an informed citizenry so a word that is new to the public discussion by a “lifetime learner” such as Ms. Pereira should be studied well. I have genuine respect for those who obtain the highest level of formal education open to them at the expense of the public (K-12) and later by their own, family or community industry. And then there are those who do read, research, and use their learning to influence their neighbors.

        Ms. Pereira does not encourage the process of judging others in the main but when she uses the word “elitist” in the past week, you know she is onto something. She has termed me an “elitist” and now paints MJF with a similar brush.

        What is she doing? Is she making a point with facts or attempting to negate positive impressions of a kind? Has she looked at the research on some African American young men who fall behind in reading skills (reported in Economist recently) after the third grade who then see higher school achievement as something to be avoided and derided? Are the folks who provide honor classes or scholarships for individuals with exceptional skills and performance, elitists? Should they be scorned or criticized? And is the practice in the primary grades of assessing student ability at a current time and identifying students currently on course, whatever that may mean as Tier 1, and those below that standard in one or more ways as Tier 2 or Tier 3 so as to receive added attention to move their abilities forward also an example of “elitism” in some way? Don’t we all want to advance educationally, and in broad learning, as well as to play well in the sandbox? Time will tell.

        0
      2. I don’t believe you have to be an elitist to understand not all people have to take the same exam to reach the same goal.
        You ask don’t top law students take the same exam as low-performing law students? Don’t all drivers take the same test?
        Well how about if you have a certain SAT score you don’t have to take the Praxis 1 exam?
        How about if you have a certain class average you don’t have to take the final?
        What’s wrong with being rewarded for being a high achiever? Everyone has an opportunity to be one. Some might have to work harder than others, but they all have the same shot!
        So again, what’s wrong with being rewarded for working hard and achieving great things?

        0
    1. I do however agree with the Police Commission’s meetings being moved from Chief Gaudett’s office. This is a purposeful attempt to intimidate the public from participating in what are supposed to be “public” meetings.

      0
  3. So Maria, you and Joe support suburbanites having equal footing on Bridgeport entry-level civil service jobs. I want to make sure I’ve got that right.

    0
    1. I don’t believe I referenced Joe’s position on this issue. I have no idea what his position is on this issue. In fact, my posting opens with “I” totally disagree.

      I never referenced “suburbanites,” you did. MJF is pitting Bridgeport graduates against other Bridgeport graduates. If she wanted to give EVERY Bridgeport resident extra points for their residency, I would support that.

      MJF never referenced graduates of BPS, she referenced “Bridgeport schools.” Bridgeport schools can easily be defined as charter, christian, Catholic schools, etc.

      Are you saying MJF is advocating only high-achieving students from the BPS would bypass civil service testing? So if there is a student who resides in Bridgeport who graduated as a high-achieving student from a charter, Catholic, christian, technical, private, etc. they would still be required to take the civil service test?

      If I graduated from a high school in New Haven as an honor roll student, and I just graduated with a four-year degree in criminal justice from UB, and was on the dean’s list all four years, and I am now a Bridgeport resident I would still have to take the civil service test, but if I am a graduate from Bassick who was a member of the Honors Society I do not have to take the civil service test. Am I correct?

      If so, please confirm this. I am sure all the parents who are registered voters in Bridgeport would love to hear about this “new, exciting, novel” and “discriminatory” idea.

      This is what happens when out-of-touch politicians throw together a platform without any real thought or information from those involved in education, the police department and fire department. Oops!

      0
        1. On the campaign trail with Mary-Jane Foster

          Jack McGregor: So how did it go today?

          MJF: I got rid of all my brochures!

          J McG: That’s my little Penguin! So where did you go today?

          MJF: I went to the 138th district, it was wonderful, I handed out every last one of my brochures, I could have handed out an easy 200 more of them! It was wonderful! I met so many people there, it was great!

          J McG: That’s my little campaigner!

          MJF: So I was supposed to meet Patricia and go door to door with her, but she was coming home late from another meeting, so Andrew said he would take me around the neighborhood. So Andrew and I started out going door to door when we happened on this one house, I rang the doorbell and this huge man opens the door while smoking this large cigar (it looked like one of your Cubans, Jack) then I said “Hi, my name is Mary-Jane Foster an I want to be your next Mayor of Bridgeport!” Then I put out my hand, and he said “what’s wrong with your friend? He’s three shades of blue.” Just as I looked back at Andrew I realized I was standing on his oxygen hose! Just when I pick up my foot, I heard this loud explosion like a roman candle! Poor Andrew was jettisoned across the street some 50 feet in the air, over a parked car and a picket fence, head first into someone’s vegetable garden! Both of us ran as fast as we could while calling 911. I could hear the Fire Truck sirens off in the distance. A large crowd of neighborhood people came running, while Rescue 5 pulled up along the garden path. Then I heard a fireman say last week they fished him out of his backyard pool, because he forgot to take off his flucking oxygen tank again! So while the Firemen started putting Andrew into the ambulance, an even larger crowd stared to gather! I figured strike while the iron is hot, I handed out all my brochures and met some of the nicest people from the 138th.

          J McG: Did Andrew have PHS Insurance?

          MJF: Oh Jack! No one has PHS anymore!

          J McG: Mary, go into my humidor box and pick out a nice Cuban cigar for the big Cuban fellow, and make sure you give him a few of your brochures, he’s been through a lot!

          MJF: I know, thanks Jack.

          J McG: Oh! Tell Andrew city insurance has a very high co-pay!

          0
          1. Jim Fox, I couldn’t think of one item in this post that was the least bit humorous. Have you lost your sense of humor today? It was mean-spirited and really kind of shocking. Your little dialogues are usually pretty funny. This one, not so much.

            0
          2. Very good Jim, but let me update you. I have no copay on my health insurance and I pay nothing. Thank You, Jim. Jim, FYI I had major heart surgery and to the dismay of many survived. No more oxygen and a great functioning heart. Can you say the same?

            0
          3. One more thing, the firefighters from Engine 15 responded to my calls for help three times. They did an excellent job and I thank them greatly.

            0
      1. First of all Maria, I’m sorry for assuming your posts do not reflect your candidate’s opinions. I will no longer do so. Please act in a similar manner. It seems often when I post something people assume I am speaking for Ed Gomes or Marilyn Moore or Mary-Jane so unless I specifically say so, assume my posts do not necessarily reflect how a candidate I am supporting thinks.

        0
        1. Bob, I don’t recall a single instance where you posted a comment and I implied or claimed you were speaking on behalf of someone else. If you have a specific example, I would certainly like you to post it.

          0
          1. Andrew is no longer on oxygen, but if he were I think the roman candle part was very funny. STEVIE!

            0
  4. And Maria, you and Joe would support charter school grads treated equally as BPS grads even though charter schools operate on a different playing field. Is that right?

    0
    1. Bob, you don’t penalize innocent children for the actions of adults. If you are expecting me to support the position an 18-year-old high-achieving student who graduated from a charter school should have less rights than a high-achieving 18-year-old graduate from Harding, you are are going to be very disappointed.

      0
  5. Bob, I was still waiting on an answer from you on that Leader question, these are great ADMINISTRATIVE IDEAS. Your candidate would make an excellent chief or deputy chief of staff. It’s never too early to start negotiations.

    0
  6. Hector, do you support MJF and Bob’s position, high school graduates in Bridgeport should be treated differently from each other? Does this proposed platform unite or divide Bridgeport residents?

    0
  7. The first problem and multipronged potential solutions-oriented position I have seen that resonates with my beliefs as a voter. Hallelujah!

    Lots of thought went into this write up and I appreciate the fact it’s not a soapbox reiteration of the issues, nor is it a “I am running, vote for me” only piece. Critical thinking is what we need at this stage. We are in dire straits on more than one front and as platforms roll out the electorate deserves to be an integral part of the plan.

    Keep them coming, MJF!

    0
  8. Maria, as usual you read into the statement what you thought it said and as usual you are wrong. Here is what was said by MJF read it again “attaining a certain level of academic achievement in Bridgeport schools, paving the way for increased local applicants.” There are no numbers here, this could mean if you graduate from a Bridgeport high school you can bypass the civil service exam which is BS anyway. You also brought up a New Haven student who graduated from college and moved to Bridgeport. He/she will get credit but not the same as the graduates of Bpt schools.

    0
    1. MJF states the civil service test should be “dismissed” for Bridgeport students who have attained a certain level of academic achievement in Bridgeport schools.

      This is her statement, not mine.

      0
        1. Andy, what difference does that make? MJF is distinguishing Bridgeport students based solely on their academic achievement, not whether they were a graduate or not.

          0
  9. Maria, doesn’t the BOE discriminate when not every child is allowed to attend a magnet school? Do colleges discriminate when they turn kids away because of low academic performance?

    0
    1. No, they do not discriminate. Every single applicant is treated the same. Those who attend are chosen by lottery. Our magnet schools are less segregated than the BPS and significantly less segregated than the charter schools located in Bridgeport.

      No, and neither is the Civil Service Commission. The point is every child is accepted into a specific college based on their SAT scores, school grades, etc. It isn’t that some applicants are required to take the SATs and others are told you have such great high school grades you do not have to take the SATS we required everyone else to take.

      Get it? Duh.

      0
      1. Stop telling me what’s suitable. You mention Trumbull too many times. I volunteer with the Lighthouse program in Bridgeport Public Schools. I do it because it lives in my soul–I wonder what your reason is.

        0
      2. You wonder why I do it? That is easy. I was born and raised in Bridgeport, and I and my siblings are all graduates of the BPS. I had phenomenal teachers who were instrumental in teaching me to think critically, to challenge those in power, and to believe in my capabilities. I have spent 41 years of my 48 years of life in the city I love. In addition, I believe public education is the foundation of a thriving democracy and the 22,000 children who attend the BPS deserve an equitable education when compared to those children who live in the suburbs. Instead of just complaining about the demise of true public education in Bridgeport, I spend a substantial amount of time, effort, and my own financial resources fighting for every resource and educational leader these children deserve.

        I have never received a dime in compensation for my activism in this city, I have never been employed by the BBOE or the City of Bridgeport, nor have any of my immediate family members, and I have never cut a backroom deal for personal gain.

        There aren’t many activists in Bridgeport who can say the same.

        0
        1. Tell us about the other six or seven years you don’t account for. Is there a reason you don’t want to bring it up? You see, I know!!!

          0
  10. No Maria, you are incorrect in what Mary-Jane said and meant. What she alluded to was for public safety jobs, police and fire which require only a high school education, Bridgeport educated students, Harding, Central, Bassick should not have to compete with students from Staples, Wilton or Darien high for civil service jobs. Bridgeport has the largest population, therefore the largest applicant pool of candidates than any city in Connecticut and they should utilize that to hire Bridgeport educated people over suburban educated people. I’m sure you knew was what she was saying and you put your SPIN on it.

    0
    1. Donald Day, that is not what is in her statement. There is no attempt at “spin.” She stated only Bridgeport graduates who have high academic achievement should not be required to take the civil service exam while every other Bridgeport graduate should. Therefore those graduates would be competing against suburban graduates.
      I suggest you reread her statement.

      0
      1. Maria, nowhere in her statement does she say “while every other Bridgeport graduate should have to take the civil service exam.” C’mon Maria, cut that out.

        0
        1. Donald Day, if her statement only references Bridgeport students who are high achieving should not have to take the civil service test, it is clear Bridgeport students who are not high achieving should be required to take the civil service test. If she wanted to ban the civil service test for all Bridgeport students the caveat regarding high achievement would not have been necessary.

          Now who is trying to place a “spin” on her statement?

          0
  11. The only consideration a responsible policy maker should have in regard to the establishment of criteria for the hiring of police officers is the safety of the public.

    Waiving a qualifying exam that tests for public-safety thinking skills would be an irresponsible measure on the part of a municipality. Smart kids with great high school records don’t necessarily have any police smarts.

    If we want Bridgeporters to serve as police officers in Bridgeport, establish a required public-safety/policing policy curriculum in the city’s high schools for day and evening students as the first step. This will assure competitiveness among test-takers/candidates among those who choose to make policework a career.

    The other essential thing that needs to happen is we need to re-impose the residency requirement and fight for it in court if need be. God knows we waste millions in court for municipal stupidity every year anyway–at least this legal expense would be for Bridgeport’s benefit and rational use of taxpayer money in this regard.

    0
      1. “The only consideration a responsible policy maker should have in regard to the establishment of criteria for the hiring of police officers is the safety of the public.”

        EXACTLY, Jeff Kohut. Thank you.

        0
  12. The bottom line is none of it’s being done now. Why? Why couldn’t this administration get creative on behalf of the constituency?

    The way I see it is some of the solutions she proposes reach into a number of different problematic areas in this City.

    * Public Safety and crime rate
    * Staffing for police and fire so our finest don’t get so burnt out
    * Motivation for Bridgeport students to take a career path in town
    * Creating jobs in the city
    * incentives for folks not to move to other municipalities
    * Community engagement

    There will always be an abundance of people ready to blow holes in potential solutions put out there by folks who are willing to, well, put themselves out there. It comes with the territory, it’s typical, it’s expected, and it’s even necessary.

    0
  13. These are my thoughts and not necessarily the thoughts of my candidate.
    By my rough calculations I am guessing there are around 30 openings a year for the BFD and the BPD. That is a total of 60. Is Maria suggesting there are not 60 qualified students graduating a year in Bridgeport public schools???
    So we have at least 60 candidates. They of course would have to pass the physical fitness and agility tests. They would have to pass any background check and psychological test. If you still have at least 60 qualified, why bother holding off tests for four years?
    Maybe you don’t do it every year but every other but today because we have chosen to make the process so complicated we wait for years until staffing levels become dangerously low.
    Maybe those graduating from the first responders school should get preferential treatment. I would have no problem with that at all.

    0
    1. Bob, where did I state I do not believe there are 60 qualified Bridgeport graduates to fill BPD and BFD vacancies? Stop making stuff up, Bob.

      0
    1. Bob, MJF only wants to give high achieving Bridgeport students an incentive. The rest of those low-achieving Bridgeport students have to take the exact same path as suburbanites and students from other urban cities.

      Elitists believe there are those who deserve privilege while the riff-raff deserve less. MJF could very well be the Leona Hensley of Bridgeport. If you recall she was famous for saying “taxes are for little people.”

      0
  14. So Maria, I am confused. Are you saying charter schools provide an equal or better education than BPS?
    That would be the only reason you find this proposal so offensive. But if you say their test results are skewed and not comparable, then why should they get equal footing?

    0
    1. Bob, don’t try to twist my words. I have never stated the curriculum in charter schools is less challenging.

      MJF is proposing only Bridgeport students who demonstrate high academic achievement would be “dismissed” from taking the civil service test. All the rest of those poor-performing Bridgeport students have to get in line with those pesky suburbanites and other urban students from other large cities.

      This personifies elitism, classism, segregation, etc.

      When I was in high school, students were segregated by ability. I was in almost all Group I classes, however there were also Group II and Group III classes. Can you imagine there were completely different expectations for students in the exact same grade and subject? It was terminated because it was a form of segregation.

      Does a child who attends college become segregated by ability? Absolutely not. Every student is held to the same academic standard. That is exactly how it should be.

      I believe in rules, but I believe rules have to be applied to all in an equitable and consistent manner.

      0
      1. Somehow passing a test is elitism. You will twist anything MJF says to call it an ism just because that is the only negative you can come up with.
        MJF is like Leona Helmsley? How can you make that up? You have a quote when MJF said taxes are only for the little people? Your post is a blatant lie. And I guess that is the only way Ganim supporters can try to dismiss Mary-Jane. Make up lies and keep on repeating them. Wow, that’s the same as the Finch strategy.

        0
        1. Bob, the fact MJF believes only high academic achievers should not be required to take a “test” while every other Bridgeport resident would be required to take the test, that I interpret as elitism and classism.

          I never said MJF made that statement. I did not tell a single lie. You constantly twist everything I say to suit your own needs.

          I am not trying to dismiss MJF. I am simply challenging a portion of her published platform I disagree with.

          It is called politics.

          0
      2. Maria, why don’t you cut that crap out. Nowhere, at no time did Mary-Jane say, insinuate or intimate high-achieving students get a free pass to civil service jobs over lower-achieving students.

        One thing about Ganim, he never lied to me or twisted his words around to meet his agenda and I’m sure he finds your actions reprehensible.

        0
        1. Donald Day, you notice how Maria picks one portion of a new vision for the residents of Bridgeport that would create a new vision for young Bridgeport residents to find a career in public safety, and she can only find something wrong. None of the candidates have come up with anything that would be a win-win and would create a jobs program for Bridgeport.

          0
        2. Donald Day, why don’t you cut the “crap” out? Her proposed platform clearly does give high-achieving Bridgeport students special treatment over ALL other Bridgeport students.

          I haven’t lied about anything.

          Now you believe as an MJF supporter you can speak about how Ganim feels about my “actions.” As I just stated, you cut the “crap.”

          .

          0
  15. I’d like to hear it from the candidates’ mouths, the Mayor has a speech writer and I’m sure all the candidates have advisers or think tanks, nothing takes the place of a heads-up debate, it should also serve as a gauge as to the interest in this campaign.

    0
  16. Maria is a very hateful person who really can’t read and decipher what she reads. She has not offered up one thing to improve Bridgeport schools. She goes to a lot of meetings, takes up a lot of room and uses up the oxygen in the room but accomplishes nothing. Today she gave herself an attaboy as one of the few people who volunteer and gets nothing in return for her or her family members vis a vis jobs. That’s pure and utter BS made up by the queen of tainted information.

    0
  17. Andy, you sound like the hateful person on this blog. I am debating a position MJF, your personal friend, has taken on a particular issue I do not agree with.

    I think most people who read OIB know who the hateful person is, who accomplishes nothing, and who is taking up oxygen, and that person is not me.

    0
  18. Maria, people in this city know me as a straight shooter, you can’t say the same. Maria, take a trip to the zoo and look at the plaque on the rain forest building and on the carousel building and you will see my name. I helped get both built. My vote saved the city from bankruptcy. You see, life in Bridgeport did not start when you graduated from Harding. List your accomplishments but leave out the negatives. Oops, that would leave a blank page.

    0
  19. This posting is ludicrous. You alone somehow saved the city from bankruptcy. I am sure everyone involved in city government at the time will be pleased to know you saved Bridgeport all on your own. You claim you helped build two attractions at the zoo. Did you raise funds, pick up a hammer, exactly what did you do?

    Andy, there are a number of people in Bridgeport who are known as straight shooters, and I absolutely consider myself to be one of those individuals.

    I will give you just one accomplishment for now. I was instrumental in fighting for, and successfully regaining, every Bridgeport residents’ right to vote for their BBOE members. I was the lead plaintiff who fought against a dictatorship and tyranny and won. Judge Lopez, Bobby Simmons and Sauda Baraka were equally responsible for this incredible victory for democracy.

    0
    1. Maria, without my vote to sell Beardsley Park and get the funds from the State, the city would have had to go into bankruptcy. My vote was the tie breaker. How’s that Ms. Know it all? Yes I was instrumental in getting the funding for the carousel, without my initiative it don’t get built and the original horses don’t get saved. Yes I was on the board when the rainforest was built.

      0
          1. Jimfox, suck up over what? Switch back over to the Foster camp? I am supporting Mayor Finch. That support does not help you or your candidate. You have a problem with me acknowledging Fardy for a job well done?

            0
      1. Andy, so you negotiated the sale and made all the decisions all on your own? Your vote was the only one that mattered. You were the only individual involved in the carousel? Sure you were. It is clear you never heard the saying there is no I in TEAM.

        0
        1. Maria, you really are a dumb ass and what Donald Day stated about you shows in this latest post. Maria, I never said I negotiated the sale of the park, I said I was the tie-breaking vote. As to the carousel, I did find the funding and made sure it was available. I was the one individualwho found the money. Gregg Dancho did the rest along with Phil Handy. You know Maria, come to think of it my vote to sell the park was in fact the only one that counted because the rest cancelled each other out. How’s that, Maria?

          0
          1. That isn’t true, Andy. If any other person voted against the sale of Beardsley Park your vote would have simply tied the vote which means Joe Ganim would have broken the tie, therefore every yes vote was critical.

            0
          2. Maria, the only people who could vote for the sale of Beardsley were members of the Park Commission. Joe Ganim had no vote at all, tie or otherwise. There were nine members of the Park Board and the vote was 4 to 4. My vote broke the tie. Day was right, you can read, you just can’t comprehend.

            0
  20. Maria, there is no way you are a straight shooter, you are a embellisher and in some cases a liar. BTW Carmen Lopez did all the work you and the rest were responsible for this court action in the first place with your negative hateful behavior while on the BOE.

    0
    1. I served on the BBOE for just 13 months before Finch, Malloy and a billionaire’s employees started secretly planning the takeover, and I am at fault for the illegal takeover orchestrated at the highest levels of state and municipal government. I am even more effective than I thought. Thanks, Andy.

      0
      1. Your behavior on the BOE along with Simmons and Baraka was partially responsible for what was attempted. You also let Ramos run roughshod over the board.

        0
  21. Maria, at one time I thought you were the voice of reason and of knowledge, now I see you are acrimonious, vindictive, malevolent, unforgiving and rancorous. I see where you tend to change what a person says to fit your own narrative whatever that is at the time. I’ve seen it with the members of the BBOE who dared to have their own opinion that was different than yours and how implacable you can be towards those individuals. It tends to be Maria’s way or the highway and you are bringing that same mindset to the election for Mayor.

    Let me give you an analogy, Maria. What is your favorite meal? Lobster, maybe a nice steak and those little red potatoes, or whatever it is you enjoy eating. Now I’m going to serve you your favorite meal and I go out back and get the top off a dirty garbage can and serve you that favorite meal. Not very appetizing, is it. That’s what you have been doing lately, giving people their favorite meal on a garbage can top.

    The way you change what someone says to fit your narrative, it’s getting so no one should believe anything you say even if your tongue came notarized. Let me be the first to say as soon as you disagree with something Joe says or does that is different than what you think, feel or believe then you will turn on him with the viciousness and brutishness I have seen you do to others. My hope is you accept this in the spirit it was offered, that being benevolence.

    0
    1. Donald Day, that’s why I ask her what relationship she has with those who were involved with the BBOE lawsuit. I wonder if they have the same relationship with Maria now based on the things you outlined.

      0
    2. You have never met me in your entire life. In fact, if you were standing 12 inches from me I would have no idea who you are, yet you presume to know so much about me.

      I don’t agree with your candidate on a position she has publicly taken and apparently that makes me a multitude of things.

      I get it. I realize you, Ron, Bob, Rob Traitor, Marilyn Moore, etc. are loyal MJF supporters. That is a good thing. I however, do not support her and never have. That doesn’t make me all you claim me to be.

      Stop with your spin, Donald. I didn’t change anything MJF stated to fit my narrative. Her platform is published above for all to see. What you don’t like is I am calling her out on her public position on treating Bridgeport residents differently from other Bridgeport residents.

      If Joe Ganim breaks his word on specific commitments he made to garner my support, I will absolutely hold him accountable. I have told him that directly. I will also be holding Dave Hennessey and Andre Baker accountable as well. You see, unlike MJF I have the same expectation for everyone I support politically. No preferential treatment or favoritism in my “platform.”

      0
  22. Ron, if you are so interested in my relationship with Judge Lopez, Sauda Baraka and Bobby Simmons, why don’t you reach out to them and ask them?

    0
  23. Ron, since you claim to have your answers from all three, why are you asking what kind of relationship I have with them? If you feel confident in what you claim to know, you don’t need my input.

    0
  24. Maria, you won’t ask them because you know ahead of time what the answer is. You are the one who is taking the credit for the victory with the BBOE lawsuit and you gave the names of three supporters in the case, so tell us how that relationship is working out now and you know things have changed, really changed.

    0
  25. Ron, I was able to speak with Bobby Simmons this evening. He stated he has never had a conversation with you in regards to our relationship. He asked for your phone number because he wanted to speak with you directly. I got the impression he was not pleased. Maybe you can consider calling his office next week.

    I absolutely do not take credit for the Supreme Court ruling. Judge Lopez deserves the most credit. Bobby and I worked directly with Judge Lopez and the attorneys, Sauda Baraka utilized a different attorney.

    0
  26. Ron, I just spoke with Sauda Baraka who authorized me to post she has not had any in-depth conversation with you on politics in YEARS. She also stated she has not had any conversation with you regarding me or her support of me. She has seen you at some social events and you have only had cursory exchanges.

    She also agrees with me 100% that MJF proposal reeks of elitism.

    0
  27. Ron, I will not respond to another comment you post. You are clearly not an ethical and honest individual.

    You posted a flagrant lie when you stated you asked each of them about their relationship and/or support of me. You were clearly implying I’d lost their support.

    I would pay money to hear your conversation with Bobby Simmons. I am sure it will not be pretty.

    0
  28. Maria Pereira, I asked you just one question but you refused to give an answer, so I changed the question to get you to give a honest reply.

    Ron Mackey // May 26, 2015 at 10:40 am
    Maria, so are you saying you were the legal mind behind the BBOE? What is your relationship with
    those you listed?

    Maria, instead of you giving me a answer you did what you are famous for, you put your spin on my question and you refused to give a answer.

    Maria Pereira // May 26, 2015 at 5:50 pm
    Ron, if you are so interested in my relationship with Judge Lopez, Sauda Baraka and Bobby Simmons, why don’t you reach out to them and ask them?

    Ron Mackey // May 26, 2015 at 1:30 pm
    Donald Day, that’s why I ask her what relationship she has with those who were involved with the BBOE lawsuit. I wonder if they have the same relationship with Maria now based on the things you outlined.

    Donald Day // May 26, 2015 at 12:40 pm
    Maria, at one time I thought you were the voice of reason and of knowledge, now I see you are acrimonious, vindictive, malevolent, unforgiving and rancorous.

    The way you change what someone says to fit your narrative, it’s getting so no one should believe anything you say even if your tongue came notarized. Let me be the first to say as soon as you disagree with something Joe says or does that is different than what you think, feel or believe then you will turn on him with the viciousness and brutishness I have seen you do to others. My hope is you accept this in the spirit it was offered, that being benevolence.

    Donald Day // May 26, 2015 at 8:23 am
    One thing about Ganim, he never lied to me or twisted his words around to meet his agenda and I’m sure he finds your actions reprehensible.

    Maria, you still wouldn’t give the answer so I changed my question hoping to get a reply.

    Ron Mackey // May 26, 2015 at 5:56 pm
    Maria, I did ask and now I want to hear what you have to say and if you don’t believe me then you ask them if I asked them.

    Maria, let me be clear, I haven’t spoken with Bobby in years, in fact I don’t know the last time we spoke. As for Sauda Baraka, we have not spoken in a while. I have the highest respect for both of them.

    But here is what you do, you spin, you gave the name of three people but ONLY gave the names of two people you spoke to, plus you turn the question around and made it about me. So Maria, when will you tell us what the third person said?

    0

Leave a Reply