Unofficial results with all Connecticut precincts reporting to the Connecticut Secretary of the State. For all races see here.
GOVERNOR AND LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR Statewide
Ned Lamont and Susan Bysiewicz | 675,155 | 48.05% |
Bob Stefanowski and Joe Markley | 624,507 | 44.45% |
Ned Lamont and Susan Bysiewicz | 17,826 | 1.27% |
Bob Stefanowski and Joe Markley | 25,386 | 1.81% |
Rodney Hanscomb and Jeffrey Thibeault | 6,078 | 0.43% |
Mark Stewart Greenstein and John Demitrus | 1,250 | 0.09% |
Oz Griebel and Monte E Frank | 54,698 | 3.89% |
Lee Whitnum and Jacey Wyatt |
Bridgeport results:
Ned Lamont and Susan Bysiewicz | 21,902 | 78.67% |
Bob Stefanowski and Joe Markley | 4,951 | 17.78% |
Ned Lamont and Susan Bysiewicz | 391 | 1.40% |
Bob Stefanowski and Joe Markley | 245 | 0.88% |
Rodney Hanscomb and Jeffrey Thibeault | 82 | 0.29% |
Mark Stewart Greenstein and John Demitrus | 24 | 0.09% |
Oz Griebel and Monte E Frank | 245 | 0.88% |
Lee Whitnum and Jacey Wyatt | 0 | 0.00% |
UNITED STATES SENATOR ( Click here for full race results )
CANDIDATE PARTY / NAME | VOTES | VOTES % |
Christopher S Murphy | 22,562 | 82.16% |
Matthew Corey | 4,025 | 14.66% |
Christopher S Murphy | 649 | 2.36% |
Richard Lion | 102 | 0.37% |
Jeff Russell | 122 | 0.44% |
Fred Linck | 2 | 0.01% |
Kristi L Talmadge | 0 | 0.00% |
REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS 04 ( Click here for full race results )
CANDIDATE PARTY / NAME | VOTES | VOTES % |
Connecticut 04 | ||
Jim Himes | 22,682 | 83.40% |
Harry Arora | 4,215 | 15.50% |
Harry Arora | 297 | 1.09% |
Yusheng Peng | 2 | 0.01% |
STATE SENATOR 22 ( Click here for full race results )
CANDIDATE PARTY / NAME | VOTES | VOTES % |
Connecticut 22 | ||
Marilyn Moore | 10,362 | 75.17% |
Rich Deecken | 2,902 | 21.05% |
Marilyn Moore | 346 | 2.51% |
Rich Deecken | 175 | 1.27% |
STATE SENATOR 23 ( Click here for full race results )
CANDIDATE PARTY / NAME | VOTES | VOTES % |
Connecticut 23 | ||
Dennis Bradley | 11,587 | 87.19% |
John Rodriguez | 1,703 | 12.81% |
STATE REPRESENTATIVE 124 ( Click here for full race results )
CANDIDATE PARTY / NAME | VOTES | VOTES % |
Connecticut 124 | ||
Andre F Baker Jr | 2,912 | 89.93% |
Jose L Quiroga | 326 | 10.07% |
STATE REPRESENTATIVE 126 ( Click here for full race results )
CANDIDATE PARTY / NAME | VOTES | VOTES % |
Connecticut 126 | ||
Charlie Stallworth | 5,362 | 84.32% |
Manuel Bataguas | 997 | 15.68% |
STATE REPRESENTATIVE 127 ( Click here for full race results )
CANDIDATE PARTY / NAME | VOTES | VOTES % |
Connecticut 127 | ||
John (Jack) F Hennessy | 3,965 | 73.13% |
Peter Perillo | 1,341 | 24.73% |
John (Jack) F Hennessy | 116 | 2.14% |
STATE REPRESENTATIVE 128 ( Click here for full race results )
CANDIDATE PARTY / NAME | VOTES | VOTES % |
Connecticut 128 | ||
Christopher Rosario | 2,366 | 88.18% |
Ethan Book | 317 | 11.82% |
STATE REPRESENTATIVE 129 ( Click here for full race results )
CANDIDATE PARTY / NAME | VOTES | VOTES % |
Connecticut 129 | ||
Steven Stafstrom | 4,507 | 82.20% |
Vallorie L Clark | 976 | 17.80% |
STATE REPRESENTATIVE 130 ( Click here for full race results )
CANDIDATE PARTY / NAME | VOTES | VOTES % |
Connecticut 130 | ||
Ezequiel Santiago | 3,202 | 89.84% |
Terry A Sullivan | 362 | 10.16% |
SECRETARY OF THE STATE ( Click here for full race results )
CANDIDATE PARTY / NAME | VOTES | VOTES % |
Denise W Merrill | 21,550 | 80.25% |
Susan Chapman | 4,243 | 15.80% |
Denise W Merrill | 475 | 1.77% |
Susan Chapman | 253 | 0.94% |
Heather Lynn Sylvestre Gwynn | 128 | 0.48% |
S Michael DeRosa | 205 | 0.76% |
TREASURER ( Click here for full race results )
CANDIDATE PARTY / NAME | VOTES | VOTES % |
Shawn Wooden | 21,544 | 80.88% |
Thad Gray | 4,212 | 15.81% |
Shawn Wooden | 503 | 1.89% |
Thad Gray | 202 | 0.76% |
Jesse Brohinsky | 177 | 0.66% |
W. Michael Downes | 0 | 0.00% |
COMPTROLLER ( Click here for full race results )
CANDIDATE PARTY / NAME | VOTES | VOTES % |
Kevin Lembo | 21,380 | 80.51% |
Kurt Miller | 4,199 | 15.81% |
Kevin Lembo | 447 | 1.68% |
Kurt Miller | 202 | 0.76% |
Paul Passarelli | 167 | 0.63% |
Edward G Heflin | 162 | 0.61% |
ATTORNEY GENERAL ( Click here for full race results )
CANDIDATE PARTY / NAME | VOTES | VOTES % |
William Tong | 21,369 | 80.20% |
Sue Hatfield | 4,384 | 16.45% |
William Tong | 447 | 1.68% |
Sue Hatfield | 231 | 0.87% |
Peter D Goselin | 213 | 0.80% |
JUDGE OF PROBATE 48 ( Click here for full race results )
CANDIDATE PARTY / NAME | VOTES | VOTES % |
Connecticut 48 | ||
Paul Ganim | 22,008 | 100.00% |
REGISTRAR OF VOTERS ( Click here for full race results )
CANDIDATE PARTY / NAME | VOTES | VOTES % |
Santa I Ayala | 20,699 | 80.20% |
Linda A Grace | 5,111 | 19.80% |
0
Many of the City Council members were away from the Monday meeting. My comments, though short on Tuesday numbers above, were completed simultaneous with the five minute notice to public speakers.
Dear OIB readers, the following was addressed to CC chambers on Monday November 5, 2018:
Let me guess that your minds are focused on Election Day tomorrow. You hope to have as many people voting as possible. Bridgeport has a poor voting record in this City when you compare the number of people registered to vote to those who come out to vote. Why is that? Does one vote mean that little? Are folks frustrated that they vote and the elected do not listen? Are people cynical when the rich get richer and folks don’t have food, shelter, clothing or good public educations? We have heard a lot about “fake news”, lies and equivocation in politics in the past two years. But what do you call a communication that was handed out in my District this weekend published by the Democratic Town Committee? Did DTC leaders hold a meeting to declare that the DTC Chair Testa and each District Chair are in favor of “fully funding education”? Those are words put in the mouth of the Democratic candidates. They further claim that certain candidates have led the fight to restructure Bridgeport finances. Where is the evidence? What does MARB offer the City? The subject is school operations. In 3 months you’ll be dealing with this again. Aren’t you happy to know that the Bridgeport DTC, your sponsors and endorsers have paid for this ad promotion and approve its message??
As Communications Director for the Greater Bridgeport NAACP for several years now, I looked for what we might do this year. I heard about the NAACP motto for the year: DEFEAT HATE – VOTE!!! I figured that this community can see hate when it shows its ugliness in words and/or action. I ordered 500 buttons. I have worn mine every day and had many conversations with “friends I had not yet met”. People know hate and know it has no place in the public square. Sometimes the hatred is about racial matters and it gets hidden institutionally.
For instance if you have a problem and wish to contact the City about it, there is a program that started as Bridgeport 311 under the previous administration that has morphed into SeeClickFix. I have talked with more than one homeowner resident and/or Council member. You seem to be happy about the ability to report an issue, have it officially recorded, and get a response that often by itself is the answer. For those of you who have Park City Communities residents in your Districts or know of their situation, why do they have a paper and pen system for reporting critical issues like failures in heating, days when no hot water is available. And multiple complaints about water, sewage and precipitation issues that cause mold and damage personal possession that are never solved. I reference months and even years of this. No accountability when paper files are lost. Fear by citizens that complaints will be met with eviction or further ignoring of basic quality of life components. Why are there two systems in play in Bridgeport with those who are caught in public housing offered one system that fails often and is not accountable ever? And another that seems to deal reasonably and timely with complaints from taxpayers? Is this equal treatment? Is it fair? (Is that part of our voting problem, too, when governance fails to deliver?)
Finally, I attended a meeting with Acting Chief Perez and Lt. O’Donnell regarding the van that was “not abandoned” on October 2. Last week Linda Lee told me that there was no action and she needs a lawyer to sue. The Chief is a nice friendly guy, but by telling the public on June 18 that he could fix it the next day and allowing nearly five months passing, he demonstrates a lack of effectiveness. And when the story of Captain Straubel, his right hand assistant, turned into a soap opera with serious racial overtones, did he do everything possible to investigate all other forms of electronic communications that would either show other patterns of racial discrimination within the department or not. Was this completed? No word on this subject is revealed as the panels listen to candidates. This reflects poorly on the current administration in my opinion. Time will tell.
John Marshall Lee
November 5, 2018
Here’s an interesting analysis on the turnout and how Lamont managed to stay competitive in smaller towns and cities: https://www.ctpost.com/politics/article/Drilling-down-Six-reasons-Ned-Lamont-is-your-new-13379612.php
Thanks for the numbers,Lennie. Are voter turnout percentages available from CT Secy of State or is that number crunching?
Frank, 66.88 percent statewide turnout. Waiting on the individual town turnout percentages.
WOW!
https://www.ctpost.com/politics/article/Several-reasons-for-huge-voter-turnout-13372271.php?utm
Well in’t that just… special.
Lennie, will you be posting thoughts related to the much-anticipated ‘blue wave’ on the national scene and the impact of the ‘urban’ vote in Connecticut?
Tom White, it would be insightful if you gave your thoughts on the subject.
The blogmaster establishes the topic.
I would love to hear Mr. Tom White’s analysis of Connecticut and National on said subject.
Tom.. I posted an analysis further up in this posting.
Hartford Courant did a more detailed analysis, but the CT Post article got the point across.
Not impressed with about 30 percent turnout in Bridgeport. We need to stop being so sad that we celebrate abysmal turnout. 85,000 registered voters and all we could get out is 25,000 or so out? C’mon people, you want funding for our schools and infrastructure? F@&$ng vote!
Scratch that 85k number. It’s 72k the percent is 34k. Still sucks.
For a midterm in bpt that’s actually good
Joe, Bridgeport turnout closer to 40 percent. That’s a jump from modern era gubernatorial turnouts. City registration is closer to 70K.
Bridgeport vote totals just went up!!!! Lamont went from 20,847 to 22,293 and stefanwonaki went from 4,916 to 5,196. And lamont now jumps from a 16,000 vote margin to 17,000. Huge numbers from bpt more like presidential!