Middle Finger Politics – City Councilwoman Pereira Once Again Censured, Stripped Of Committee Assignments Over A Variety Of Abusive Acts, Urged To Resign

Maria Pereira silenced again.

It’s really not a question if it will happen, but when it will happen because it’s become routine.

Facing multiple state charges of election fraud, City Councilwoman Maria Pereira did not stick around Monday night to confront the latest sanctions leveled by her peers on the legislative body unrelated to her recent arrest associated with the 2023 municipal election.

Racial remarks directed at City Attorney Tyesha Toms, pointing a middle finger at acting school chief Royce Avery, verbally abusing city employees including social media attacks are some of the highlights in a City Council resolution passed unanimously.

What’s different in this resolution is a call for the Upper East Side councilwoman to resign. That’s not likely to happen.

The Bridgeport City Charter has a provision to remove a recalcitrant council member, but Connecticut law has no recall provision for wayward elected officials so the best they can do is urge her to resign.

As the resolution was about to be introduced by City Council President Aidee Nieves at the end of the Monday night session, Pereira picked up her things and left the chambers, ducking her accusers.

The approval of this resolution means Pereira is stripped of committee assignments, has no voice or vote, not a particularly happy thing for the noisy councilwoman.

The approved resolution:

WHEREAS, Councilwoman Pereira has been censured by the City Council and removed from her committee assignments multiple times, most recently due to racist comments directed at the Chief of Police and Muslim constituents gathered in the Council chamber, unbecoming behavior such as directing the middle finger towards constituents at a Council meeting, and making personal and derogatory remarks about City staff; and,

WHEREAS, Councilwoman Pereira has continued to use racially discriminatory remarks directed at City employees, most recently referring to the City Attorney as “a DEI hire”; and,

WHEREAS, Councilwoman Pereira engaged in unbecoming and disruptive behavior at a Board of Education information session on April 3, 2025, directing disparaging remarks towards BOE staff and consultants, as well as giving the middle finger to the Acting Superintendent of Schools and staff; and,

WHEREAS, after said meeting, Councilwoman Pereira engaged in a personal attack directed towards a Board of Education employee on Facebook in an attempt to embarrass this employee; and,

WHEREAS, multiple agencies that have applied to Community Development Block Grant funding have alleged that Councilwoman Pereira has engaged in unethical and unbecoming behavior including:

  • participation in the CDBG process despite a clear conflict of interest under the City’s Ethics Ordinance and federal regulations,
  • “harass[ment], bull[ying], and bias,” and
  • spreading misinformation about applicant organizations and/or their applications.

WHEREAS, multiple members of the Citizen’s Union and the City Council have complained about Councilwoman Pereria engaging in undue pressure and influence over the Citizen’s Union process for evaluating CDBG applications before the Citizen’s Union has had an opportunity to deliberate and make recommendations to the City Council; and,

WHEREAS, multiple members of the Citizen’s Union and the City Council have complained that Councilwoman Pereira was engaging in unbecoming and disruptive behavior at the CDBG Council-Citizen’s Union public hearings; and,

WHEREAS, members of the Housing and Community Development Office have reported that Councilwoman Pereira has engaged in verbally abusive and unbecoming behavior towards them; and,

WHEREAS, there is a sense of the body that Councilwoman Pereira’s recent and past behavior has been and continues to be unbecoming of an elected official and that there is no excuse or justification for her outrageously inappropriate behavior; and,

WHEREAS, Councilwoman Pereira has been restored to her committee assignments and full participation in the body multiple times after censorship in the hopes that she would reform her behavior and not repeat her past unethical, unbecoming conduct; and,

WHEREAS, Bridgeport City Charter, Chapter 5, §5 (b) provides:

“The city council may determine its rules of proceeding in conformity to the general principles of parliamentary law, may punish members for disorderly behavior, and, after notice and hearing, may, by a two-thirds vote of all council members, expel a member for due cause. A quorum shall consist of eleven council members. At the request of any council member, the vote upon any question shall be taken by roll call vote;” and,

WHEREAS, City Council Member Maria Pereira is hereby provided with an opportunity to provide a full and complete apology for her unbecoming behavior prior to a vote of the body.

 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT: The City Council of the City of Bridgeport for the reasons stated herein, officially hereby condemns and as a body disavows City Council Member Pereira’s recent improper behavior as not being representative of the values, decency and commitment to civil discourse that we hold dear.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT: City Council Member Pereira is hereby held in contempt and is suspended from all of her committee assignments until a complete and sincere apology is made.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT: Council Member Pereira is hereby called upon to resign from her office immediately for the best interests of the City’s Legislative body as a whole and the public it serves.

4+
Share

9 comments

    1. “WHEREAS, Councilwoman Pereira has continued to use racially discriminatory remarks directed at City employees, most recently referring to the City Attorney as “a DEI hire”; and,”

      Let me get this straight. The Joe Biden administration creates a racially discriminatory term–DEI. The term goes viral and widely used. Yet, no one has objected to the Democratic Party’s creation of such “racially discriminatory term.”
      FastTrack to Bridgeport, Connecticut. Councilwoman Maria Pereira labels an obvious DEI hire a “DEI hire” and in doing so, she is a racist?

      “BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT: City Council Member Pereira is hereby held in contempt and is suspended from all of her committee assignments until a complete and sincere apology is made.”

      What’s the Bridgeport City Council’s definition of “a complete and sincere apology?”
      Must Maria Pereira stand before a church congregation and express her apology as sincere as Joe Ganim did? What’s more sincere than calling a spade a spade or a DEI hire, a DEI hire?

      1+
  1. Uncut/edited

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHRknjaGEOo

    To uniting the spiritual family of the God of Abraham, L’chaim, fi sehtak, Salute

    Happy Darth Vader Day, Chocolate Bunny Day, Starvation Day, and Rebirth.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5huH3kFVX8

    P.S Free Maria,

    Also, Brain for Mayor, Billboards, Brian, Billboards, and don’t worry about mudding up the water in the Port. Its CC gives tax break/incentive for so long, everybody on the CC who voted for it will be dead/pass before the city see any taxation form it. 🙂

    To be fair, some may still be a live, though perhaps sporting Depends. 🤣

    0
  2. RT, Were you present at the Hearing, Public Speaking, and City Council meeting last evening? I suspect not from your comments.
    I was present in person for some of the governance activities and wish to report that:
    * The Chamber was half-filled by tradesmen and women and speakers making opinions known and supported by the audience.
    ** Public speaking had ten folks signed up for the three minute time slots. A variety of subjects with good applause for many of the subjects.
    *** Only one CC speaker in the public slots last night. Can Maria Pereira sign up for time slots at future meetings or is the sanction from the CC forestalling that activity?
    Lots of PUBLIC OPINION surfacting, much of it fact based and providing evidence to voters. Time will tell.

    3+
  3. I’ll give you the courtesy of a response, John

    Why ask a question you know the answer too? Suspect? Did you see me there, it’s was not like it was a packed house and standing room only. While I wasn’t present at the CC Meeting I did watch some of it on Lennie’s fed, Courtesy of WEEP. Half-filled may be a, in kind words, a bit of an over exaggeration, don’t you think? Based on my observation I suspect there were a lot of people not presents, can you put on blast a few more who didn’t attend? 🙂

    The only comment I made regarding CC business was about extending tax break for Steele Point that I read.
    You seemed to take issue with my comment regard a city take break that runs until 2072 since it came of as a negative because you question my precent as an invalidation to my voice here on the best ESL class, OIB. Or at least that’s how my “subjective” though process took/read it.

    I another read was that perhaps the Port may find the funding to advance the Port’s MLS stadium.

    I can’t depart the Port/OIB with out the Prophet, Peace Out, Port, John, OIB.

    P.S Get out John its a trap. 🙂

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Br8sFdntSGU

    0
  4. RT,
    Seriously. How many times have I offered coffee and conversation with you with a welcoming offer on OIB with my phone number?
    When you do not accept such an offer, how do I know what you look like? So I do not need to respond out of routine courtesy, even when you aspire to a response, as we are not ‘doing a deal’ or ‘transacting an exchange’.
    When you are ready, I will keep the offer open. And I will then explain why a question is posed even when I have some evidence to suspect an answer. Too complicated. Time will tell.

    1+
  5. “…And I will then explain why a question is posed even when I have some evidence to suspect an answer.”

    A question? More like a million questions! Nature can’t produce enough coffee beans to cover such a looooong conversation. Besides, Robert Teixeira suffers from very short attention span. So short in fact, he gets to dial just 2 digits of your phone number and soon after goes back to posting OIB comments for you to enjoy.

    0
  6. Fair enough John,

    Seriously, a few times, I believe. To be fair I do believe I extended that invitation to meet at Port’s tree lighting. I did not see you there. Perhaps I missed you in the crowded Green.

    https://onlyinbridgeport.com/wordpress/with-heat-and-hot-water-activated-success-village-receiver-knott-files-first-report-to-court/

    It dose get complicated at times, though. There’s a SIMPLE reason, explanation, answer. People’s words tend to not match the face value of the words they put forth. I am sure you can comprehend that, being a Yale informed, educated man.

    However, to what avail do you seek a meet and greet with me. I am sure it’s not to discuss physicsing. I know Religion would be taboo for an Atheist. Those to be fair that is an assumption I gathered over the years we conversed here on OIB. What do you intend to gain. Do you intend to teach me?

    Good, luck, Port.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQCSxqScSVQ

    0

Leave a Reply