Awaiting State Budget Approval, Ganim To Submit Leap-Of-Faith Fiscal Plan To City Council

Mayor Joe Ganim next week is scheduled to submit his spending plan to the City Council for the budget year starting July 1 loaded with a number of variables awaiting passage of the state budget. So much of what happens during this legislative session impacts municipal budgets across the state.

The mayor will issue a budget that calls for no tax increase, while (hold your breath) the financial wrangling plays out in Hartford with Bridgeport’s legislative delegation, the largest in the state, jawboning pockets of money as a safety net to make the municipal plan whole.

City leaders and financial bean counters are not alone relying on Hartford insiders to persuade legislative leaders and Governor Ned Lamont to open the financial spigot with the state swimming billions deep in surpluses.

Lamont is being particularly persnickety about not messing much with the financial guardrails that limit spending, particularly now with a litany of unknowns from the Trump administration pulling back on traditional benefits involving education, veterans, Medicaid and numerous federal grants filtered through the state budget that comes the municipal way.

Municipal leaders will submit the city budget, as required by the City Charter, on Tuesday April 1. The proposed spending plan will then be in the hands of the seven-member Budget & Appropriations Committee that will process the better part of two months reviewing the plan, interviewing department heads about priorities, conducting public hearings before making changes and going to the full council for approval.

The mayor has a veto window, if needed, prior to setting of the mill rate.

The city recently empaneled a 13-member Charter Revision Commission to review the document that guides municipal rules and regulations. One topic under consideration to bring to voters for approval is buying some time on the April calendar while the state budget plays out to craft a local budget without so many unknowns.

 

 

0
Share

12 comments

  1. So, Joe has us looking down the barrel of a shotgun, it’s not Joe that’s going to increase your Taxes.
    It’s the BBOE and Governor Lamont and unknowns from Trump the Flucking Moron!!
    On one hand Joe’s holden the line on Taxes and other hand on the Trigger!

    3+
    1. These two Clowns aren’t being transparent nor realistic to put it lightly. It’s been a few years since I’ve pointed OIB readers in the direction of the true Fiscal condition of our State. The Governor, the Bridgeport Delegation, and Mayor Joe Ganim have always and will continue to spin the State’s and our City’s Fiscal Health in ways that benefits their agenda.

      Who should we trust then to provide us with not just the Fiscal Health for 2025, but the Fiscal Healt/Projection of 2025-2028?

      Answer: The Independent Office of Fiscal Analysys (OFA) and yours truly.

      NOTE: Pay attention to Appendix E.
      John Marshall Lee, pay attention to the Department of the State Comptroller and Pension System.

      https://schoolstatefinance.org/resources/fiscal-accountability-reports-office-of-fiscal-analysis

      1+
  2. Edit version, can’t have OIB ES Class to get a fail mark, 🙂

    [Full disclosure 8 parts/click count for each bathroom G2 insulted CT Governor. ]
    https://onlyinbridgeport.com/wordpress/the-royal-flush-of-campaign-messaging-toilets/

    Part 1
    Jesus people, what is the DOE of the Mild-East of America?

    That treaty of “unwind” didn’t last long, Abolishment is back on the table.

    John, you’re a Yale informed education, coded/decode man. Do you make sense of any of this shit?

    Linda McMahon, The Secretary of Education, words don’t add up on their face value.

    She stated Governors, state superintendents of Education have said, if they received the DOE funding with less red tape and strings attached they can improve the overall quality of education being produced in their districts/states. Though perhaps more of an failing in the trailer park/urban districts.

    Wouldn’t you say LV, mama disingenuous? 🙂

    0
  3. Part 2

    The rational argument for closing the DOE is that the DOE is the root cause for the current state of America’s failed education system, and it is what’s holding our education system down from educating its students. They claim the only way to save America’s education system is to eliminate the DOE, if and when the DOE is eliminated will America be able to have a thriving public education system in America. Really Linda? 🙂

    Yet The Secretary of Education also stated some states were able to create thriving educational teaching methods and processes that has considerably positively improved on the quality of education under the current DOE that is not failing its students, citing NAEP test gaugement results.

    So again, what the F are we talking about, people?🙂

    Are you people really listening to yourselves? 🙂

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKjxFJfcrcA

    To be fair, while the words on there face value is idiotic there could be coded, innuendo language being spoken. 😇

    0
  4. Part 3

    If the funding is staying, though spread through more bureaucracy, various federal governmental departments making it less efficient, you would think. Not sure if any attachment or strings, including testing like NAEP to assess the progress is going to follow the money.

    https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?
    q=joe%20ganim%20and%20ned%20lamont%20debate&mid=2BFACE9A34BB30B890CA2BFACE9A34BB30B890CA&ajaxhist=0

    0
  5. Part 5

    With know the details of the red tape and stings attached if they will follow. But I would assume one of those attachment or string would be to test the effectiveness of the education being provided by the states
    If/when the DOE is elimination. No?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=19&v=JkZdlin-dsU&embeds_referring_euri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bing.com%2F&embeds_referring_origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bing.com&source_ve_path=Mjg2NjY

    0

Leave a Reply