Not Teachers’ Pet, But CEA Endorses Malloy

The relationship between Governor Dan Malloy and public school teachers has at times been like nails against a blackboard, but today the powerful Connecticut Education Association that represents them announced its endorsement of Malloy over Republican Tom Foley, stating “A CEA analysis indicates that Foley’s scheme would drain more than $35 million from local public schools, causing teacher layoffs and larger class sizes.”

Malloy’s embrace of common core standards and charter schools alienated public school advocates. He’s backed away from some of his initiatives in recognition of his shaky standing with some teachers. Given the chance not to endorse at all this cycle, the CEA went with Malloy.

In the release CEA president Sheila Cohen states:

“Our members have never hesitated to share their sentiments, for example, feelings ranging from lingering hurt to lasting indignation about the tenure comment the governor made a few years ago. As a teacher, I feel what so many teachers feel. But the facts are the facts. And, as the state’s largest teacher organization, it is our responsibility to not sit on the sidelines at this critical time, but to take a stand–a stand that is dictated by what is in the best interest of students, teachers, and public education.”

Full CEA news release:

CEA President Sheila Cohen announced today that the Connecticut Education Association Board of Directors has endorsed Governor Dan Malloy for re-election this November 4th.

Said Cohen, “The CEA leadership and members took great pains to examine the records and positions on education of all the candidates for governor. We looked at their past statements and actions, at their questionnaire responses, and their comments in various forums and debates. We did what teachers do: We examined the facts.”

Cohen continued, “Issues such as public education funding, teacher pensions, and collective bargaining are the priorities we used to examine candidates’ positions. On these issues, Tom Foley sets the state on a path to education disaster, while Dan Malloy provides a better direction for students, teachers, and public education.”

Cohen explained, “We went into this process with our eyes wide open. Initially, not everything we saw was our vision of what was best for teachers, children, and public education. But when we saw how he’s made his door open to us, and taken strong stands on important issues, we felt Malloy/Wyman was a better direction.”

“Dan Malloy has increased education funds by half a billion dollars, including millions into underperforming schools. He’s the first governor in state history annually to fully fund the teacher pension plan during his term in office. And Governor Malloy would protect our collective bargaining rights completely,” Cohen said.

Tom Foley supports a money follows the child scheme that would have enormous consequences for students, families, teachers, and communities. A CEA analysis indicates that Foley’s scheme would drain more than $35 million from local public schools, causing teacher layoffs and larger class sizes. “While a loss of $35 million would be the initial impact, the long-term consequences would even be deeper. Simply put, they would be absolutely destructive,” said Cohen.

Foley elaborated on his scheme while presenting at this month’s CEA Education Forum in Wallingford. He said that he envisions apportioning different amounts of money for different children in his money follows the child plan. He added that “high-performing kids are not expensive to educate,” so the amount of grant that would move with the high-performing student would be lower. “In public education in Connecticut, we’ve never had the kind of conversations that Tom Foley is bent on having. We’ve never had them because they would lead to chaos and destruction,” said Cohen.

Foley’s vision for a new kind of Connecticut extends well beyond funding. The public record indicates he’s supported a Wisconsin moment coming to Connecticut, whereby collective bargaining rights for teachers would be eradicated. Cohen explained, “Tom Foley’s comments show he won’t stop at creating chaotic school funding and eliminating teachers’ rights. All indications are that he would eliminate teachers’ pension guarantees and replace them with an alternative, privatized system.”

CEA leadership consulted thousands of teachers through polling, internal groups and large-scale meetings, and conducted an unprecedented forum with the candidates this month.

Cohen added, “Our members have never hesitated to share their sentiments, for example, feelings ranging from lingering hurt to lasting indignation about the tenure comment the governor made a few years ago. As a teacher, I feel what so many teachers feel. But the facts are the facts. And, as the state’s largest teacher organization, it is our responsibility to not sit on the sidelines at this critical time, but to take a stand–a stand that is dictated by what is in the best interest of students, teachers, and public education.”

0
Share

25 comments

  1. Teachers have been taking lessons from Malloy for four years now. In the event they vote to elect Malloy simply because the CEA says they should, I will always question their ability to teach. If you can’t learn a four-year lesson like the one from Malloy, how can you teach? How can I trust the quality of your learning?

    0
    1. Let me make this very clear to you, Mr. Troll. Joel Gonzalez typed this:
      Why is Bob Walsh, Mary-Jane Foster, Bill Finch, Marilyn Moore and others working together when up to not long ago they were at war? What are some of the reasons and concerns they have if Malloy loses? If Malloy loses, the Big Wave will come back to Bridgeport. Not a good thing for Fabrizi, Mary-Jane Foster, Bill Finch, etc. Is this new unity really about Malloy? If Chris Caruso were to return to Bridgeport and step into the Dem. Primary, who can convince him to drop out and throw his support to them? What if he doesn’t bite? If Malloy is re-elected, he will not get involved in the mayoral primary and pick a horse.

      Troll, I supported and voted for Foley in 2010. I had switched party affiliation in 2008 and by 2010 was on the Bridgeport RTC for awhile. The teachers, taxpayers and all in between got what they voted for not what they were promised (except for state workers). I won’t be hurting no matter who wins. Me or any of us teach Malloy a lesson? Are you on hard drugs? Malloy is the one who for four years was giving the lessons that hurt many. I tried to save your ass from that which was obviously going to happened. You are middle class and don’t give a fuck about the poor who will be hurt the most. The Democrats have dug us (CT) into a hole so deep, that despite being on the ballot, I as of yet not having spent a dime. Why? For one, I will never lie to any voter and say to them, imply or suggest I or we will fix the mess we are in. But one thing is for sure, I would never compromise my principles by helping anyone who is responsible–the Democrats–for the creation of this mess. It wasn’t Jodi Rell when she was Gov. with a Democratic-controlled house and senate. If it was her fault as Governor and not the house or senate, then today Malloy is at fault unless he blames the house and the senate controlled by Democrats ’til this very minute. You really think Malloy is giving you a job? Maybe, maybe he’ll throw some work to your employer. Problem is there won’t be any money to pay you. So save the little bit of money you made working for Moore.

      0
  2. Oh, what a surprise!
    When they refer to their analysis, they mean their agenda.
    Did teachers vote on whom to endorse?
    Overall, Democrats toe the line with the unions. They can rely on each other election after election.

    0
  3. I received a call about this on Saturday from a friend of mine who is a teacher in a suburb. She was a delegate at the CEA meeting and she was absolutely livid.

    There is no other CEA chapter that should have voted either no or to abstain when it came to voting on endorsing Malloy, than the Bridgeport Education Association. It is my understanding every single Bridgeport delegate voted not to endorse either Malloy or Foley. It was unanimous in Bridgeport. It is also my understanding Rob Traber, the newly elected BEA president, went to the meeting and voted to endorse Malloy.

    So much for elected leaders representing their members, constituents, colleagues, etc.

    0
    1. Linda Lambeck just posted this on her Education Matters blog.

      “And this, from Rob Traber, president of the Bridgeport Education Association. (The BEA, last week, voted not to endorse any gubernatorial candidate, according to sources who were there.)”

      “I am one who changed his mind in the discussion from ‘not sure who I would vote for and no endorsement’ to ‘vote for Malloy and endorse Malloy’. I would also have explained the reason for my change of heart. We did the right thing, even though, and let’s be very clear, nobody in that room expressed their love and appreciation for Malloy.”

      Here is the comment I posted.

      September 30, 2014 at 1:06 pm

      “Rob Traber, you completely betrayed every Bridgeport delegate that voted UNANIMOUSLY not to endorse either Malloy or Foley. You sir, are not the president of the BEA, you are its dictator.

      You have repeatedly bashed Malloy over the illegal takeover of the BBOE, the massive expansion of charter schools in Bridgeport, the severe underfunding of the Bridgeport Public Schools, Stefan Pryor, Malloy’s Commissioner of Education, etc. and against the wishes of every single one of your school delegates, you voted to endorse him. That is not representative of a democracy, that represents a dictatorship.”

      0
    2. I don’t know where you got that information, but I was at that meeting and Rob never intended to endorse Malloy. How strange someone would completely turn around what happened at the meeting. One delegate suggested the BEA vote to not endorse anyone, and this was seconded by the others. Rob had nothing to do with it, and if he had any thoughts on the matter he kept them to himself. I know this because I was sitting very near him.

      0
      1. Sue, the BEA meeting was held at Central High School. A motion was made not to endorse Malloy and it was seconded, another delegate suggested a friendly amendment to the motion so neither Malloy nor Foley would be endorsed. The friendly amendment was accepted. Every single delegate at that BEA meeting voted to NOT endorse either Malloy or Foley.

        Rob represents every BEA member, not himself. If the membership votes UNANIMOUSLY not to endorse Malloy or Foley, how does the BEA president go to the CEA meeting to vote to endorse Malloy?

        Are you implying Rob did not vote to endorse Malloy at the CEA meeting?

        0
        1. It’s a simple case that you have your facts wrong! PS: On the CEA Board, Rob represents every single CEA member who work in Fairfield County. Your questions are none of your business since you are not a member of the Union. Rob owes an explanation to the members!

          0
  4. Did anyone click on the advertisement for Marilyn Moore to the left of the home page? There is a photo featuring Marilyn Moore with John Stafstrom and another with John Stafstrom’s husband.

    Unfortunately, there are so few Bridgeport politicians who are principled, transparent and ethical.

    I haven’t spoken with a single Bridgeport politician with in-depth political knowledge who thinks she will win in November. It will be interesting to see what happens.

    0
      1. Lennie, I need some clarification. Are we speaking about current, past or both types of politicians? Are those who have sought elected office but have never been elected included?

        0
    1. Maria, I’m wondering if you have plans to be at any school campaigning for anyone on election day. What are the chances any or all of these BPT pols will stand in front of any schools to make sure Moore doesn’t win? Will Musto be one of them? Time will reveal.

      0
  5. I agree Maria, this is not a new strategy. They will sacrifice a seat if they believe they can get it back later. Auden is the choice to most anyone, me included, but I can see where they might try to make Steve (nephew) the one. If Marilyn wins it messes up that scenario for at least four years.

    0
    1. Why wasn’t Moore present at that event? I mean the Governor was coming to her district too. But you are on to something here, Hector. Maybe the Troll can tell us something about this question. He is not the treasurer of Moore any longer, Mary-Jane is still reporting to work at UB. Is the Troll now the Moore campaign manager?

      0
  6. Lennie, don’t tell me the members of this CEA board are teachers. Any of them math teachers? Attention all CEA and BEA leadership and members alike. Math class begins now. Sit down and listen/read carefully and use your common sense. Not the common core math you’ve just been fed.

    “A CEA analysis indicates that Foley’s scheme would drain more than $35 million from local public schools, causing teacher layoffs and larger class sizes.”

    The Office of Fiscal Analysis (a non-partisan body) has projected a state deficit of around $6 billion in the next 3 years or so.

    What do you think Malloy is going to do to you? Consider what he has done in the last three years when he faced a smaller deficit.

    Can any one of you please show documented proof in the past the Office of Fiscal Analysis numbers have been way off target as Malloy has been on just about everything?

    I’m started to see what ‘The blind leading the blind’ means. I just can’t wait for the election to be over just to see how gullible or not so gullible CT teachers are. State employees think their jobs are safe with Malloy’s plans. Take a look at the projections of Fiscal Analysis. Time will reveal.

    0

Leave a Reply