The Tricky Relationship Between The Post And Mayor’s Office

A few days ago the mayor’s office declared war against the Connecticut Post in an eblast to the business community condemning the paper for coverage “hurtful to all of our efforts to improve our city.” One way to rally support against a media concern is to win over the folks who invest advertising dollars. So far, publicly at least, the Post is allowing its scribes to handle the response. For instance, a passage from the latest column of Keila Torres Ocasio who’s in the mayoral office scope as one of the chiefs of negativity.

“City officials and business leaders often complain about the city’s negative public image. They say it’s too tinged with crime and violence and negativity in general. But what they should know is that residents can’t concentrate on much else because they are afraid.”

Hugh Bailey, assistant editorial page editor, suggests in his Sunday column that Mayor Bill Finch is disingenuous in claiming a mayoral-appointed school board takes the politics out of the process to seat BOE members. His column here.

Newspaper publishers don’t have a history of practicing what they preach when they become the news–and a mayoral effort to win over the business community against the publisher is news (yes, the eblast was authored by mayoral Chief of Staff Adam Wood, but it was sanctioned by the mayor)–so it’s hard to know what Post Publisher John DeAugustine’s thinking about this effort. OIB has sent an email to the publisher for a response.

The relationship between a newspaper publisher and the government power is a tricky thing. It can be good, it can be bad. Dudley Thomas, who served as publisher of the Post when Joe Ganim was elected mayor in 1991, wanted to be partner in news content and in government operations. That’s a bad thing. It was good for Joe though because once the newsroom learned Ganim had hired Jo Fox as governmental press secretary at the urging of the newspaper publisher they were terrified to write anything against the mayor or meow about Fox who wasn’t bashful voicing the reason for her hiring. She was a friend of the publisher. Joe and Dudley had lunch often through the years. That relationship was such that in 1994 Thomas ordered a screaming header on the front page of the Sunday Post endorsing Ganim for governor. Funny thing about it, Joe was not even a candidate for governor. He became a candidate for governor on the strength of that headline.

What will become of the relationship between mayor’s office and the Post publisher? Depends how hard the mayor’s office weighs in on this effort. The Post is owned by Hearst. The bottom line matters most. If the Post loses some key advertisers in this effort DeAugustine will have some explaining to do to his boss in San Francisco. He might be able to explain it away but he must explain. Today’s newspaper publishers are not newspeople like the old days. They’re marketing/advertising professionals. But bottom lines can also be impacted if Hearst develops a reputation of going in the tank for governmental powers. They could also suffer a newsroom revolt from scribes if they perceive a cozy relationship at the expense of news judgment.

So far it appears the Post response is we hear you, but …

The headline in the print edition of Keila’s column: “It’s hard to talk about anything but violence.” The headline in the online story: “It’s hard to change the subject from violence.” Keila’s holding her ground. Her latest:

Within seconds of meeting 3-year-old Katelin Gordon, it is clear she has lots of energy.

The rambunctious preschooler doesn’t stand in one spot too long. Instead, she chooses to run between the living room and kitchen in her Bridgeport home collecting random items–including a rag, a packaged handkerchief and magnetic letters on the refrigerator -for a pile she is building in the doorway.

As she goes to cover the pile with the rag, her plan is cut short.

“Katelin, put that stuff back,” says her mother, sitting at the kitchen table. “And stop running.”

Any parent would worry about their child tripping over a pile in a doorway and hurting themselves. But few parents probably worry about the kind of injury Katelin could sustain.

The preschooler has a bullet lodged in her pelvic bone. Doctors didn’t want to remove it for fear of crippling her. Her parents worry about what could happen if she falls too hard on that side and lands on it.

Katelin was shot April 30 as she was walking hand-in-hand with her mother on the city’s West Side. They were caught in the crossfire of a shootout between rival groups.

Since then, Katelin has been afraid of loud noises and prefers to stay indoors. Fireworks on the Fourth of July paralyzed her in fear. Her father, Marlon Gordon, still remembers her panic and the way she dug her fingernails into his back.

Now, every time Katelin hears a bang–even if it’s just the sound of a pot falling on the floor–she begins yelling, “They’re shooting. We’ve gotta go. We’ve gotta go.”

Last week, a 9-year-old girl sitting in a room in her East Side home was grazed in the face by a stray bullet during a shootout that claimed the life of a 17-year-old boy. Neighbors say they have not seen the family since then.

Shootouts in the middle of the day are becoming commonplace in this city and the violence has many residents fearful to step out of their doors.

So last week I tried to change the subject and focus on some of the more positive things going on in Bridgeport.

Steelpointe Harbor is now a real project with a tenant, developer and actual dollars committed to the East Side development. In the city’s downtown region, revitalization is chugging along with developer Phil Kuchma successfully breathing life into lower Fairfield Avenue. The Bridgeport Economic Development Corporation, a public-private partnership, was recently revived and the city hired a new development director.

On Monday, I made this progress and any other economic development issues in the region the topic of my latest weekly online chat.

For the first six minutes, no one participated.

I was left talking to myself for the first half-hour of the chat. The conversation only picked up when the one person who was commenting on economic development asked, “On another note … What the heck is going on over on the East Side? Those kids over there are going crazy.”

There have been three shootings in the East Side in the past few weeks. I couldn’t get anyone to talk about economic development, but lots of residents were upset about the violence there and in the city and wanted to discuss that.

City officials and business leaders often complain about the city’s negative public image. They say it’s too tinged with crime and violence and negativity in general. But what they should know is that residents can’t concentrate on much else because they are afraid.

And that goes for Katelin’s parents who are finding it hard to focus on anything but that fact that their 3-year-old is living with a bullet in her body.

0
Share

11 comments

  1. *** The tricky part is truth and transparency which is something this admin has had trouble with right from the start. In my opinion the times city government has stepped up, proposed or achieved positive results towards moving this city forward, the CT Post has been there to explain and support their actions. Now as we get closer to the date in which voters will choose between a “voter elected” or “Mayor appointed” BOE, it seems Finch & Co. have developed a bit of “thin skin” phobia towards any type of criticism! Maybe it’s time “both” step up to the plate and do their jobs the good old-fashioned way by earning the respect of the people! *** PEOPLE POWER! ***

    0
  2. The Hugh Bailey article helped me to understand and focus on the “final corruption” of the Charter Review Process this year. The Mayor’s instruction to his ‘hand-picked panel’ in January was to provide him with the power to respond to those who called on him to improve the school system. He claimed he is an accountable Mayor. He said it often. That is a claim I have challenged frequently, especially around financial issues.

    The Charter Review group could have dealt with the City’s major problems: MONEY to run City government supplied by property owners called taxes and HIGH MIL RATES that work perversely to decrease owner asset values when they go to re-sell. But the group stayed focused on the educational issue with ‘experts’ claiming success for an appointed board relative to elected boards.
    Bridgeport’s recent and notable failure of an elected Board to perform (though Bridgeport elected BOE experience in the past was not called into evidence) nailed this coffin shut. But where was the discussion and evidence a legislative body, which limits public discussions and is already overtasked with responsibilities not handled seriously, might also participate in the accountability process? What will it look like? Why are we getting to this point at this date?

    Perhaps it is about money, in fact perhaps it has been about it always, and jobs to be offered (but not work product on which to provide performance evaluations).

    The latest monthly report for June 2012 says the City spent about $252 Million operating last year. That does not include the BOE that spent $215 Million operating, $11 Million nutrition, and $15 Million on debt payments for a total of $242 Million. What many do not realize is in 2011 educational grants added $70 Million to BOE. If 2012 results show similar grant funding then BOE total spending (not including Capital Construction) exceeded $310 Million or 20% more than Bridgeport spends on the City operating side. Jobs, funds, purchases and discretion that extends POWER. It is a lot of money and there has been too little oversight activity in the City (or by the Charter review group) on fiscal accountability, analysis, and routine oversight.
    If you are happy with your taxes, property values and the way City employee cases are handled initially (and later settled quietly with your tax money), etc. you may support the Charter change to provide Mayor and Council with more power over the BOE.

    Can thin-skinned people discuss these types of matters in public meetings with the public present? Or have we gone so far towards balance in government in Bridgeport it is unreasonable for us to expect them to act responsibly in this regard? It is too easy to have the power to defer questions, rig committees, eliminate voices from public decision-making on Boards and commissions, etc. so why should they bother to have open discussion or debating? Keep your eye on the money. Keep asking for all of the reports available. Keep your eyes on City Council Budget and Appropriation meetings. THERE IS A B&A MEETING ON MONDAY EVENING AUGUST 13.
    Pay attention to the multiple conflicts of interest allowed in Bridgeport by those in power. Good government? Accountable leadership? Time will tell.

    0
  3. What a difference a year makes.

    Bill Finch for mayor of Bridgeport
    Updated 3:08 p.m., Monday, September 19, 2011
    Though his tenure has been far from perfect, Bridgeport Mayor Bill Finch has brought the state’s largest city to a better place than it was in four years ago.

    While some of his methods raise questions, his focus is on the right things: the city’s financial security, economic growth, safety, education and sustainability.

    For these reasons, the mayor has the endorsement of the Connecticut Post in the Democratic primary election set for Sept. 27.

    Okay CT Post, he’s your boy, now who’s disingenuous???

    0
  4. Financial security? Check your tax bill lately? Not. Economic Growth? Anybody think one tenant at Steel Point equates to 4.5 economic growth? Not. Safety? How many dead this summer? Not. Education? Illegal takeover, out-of-town billionaires and interim superintendent spending like a drunken soldier. Not. Sustainability? Sustain what? Not.

    0
  5. Keila Torres! To some of us, she is a glimmer of hope some things going on in City Hall just might be talked about beyond the four walls of the government center. The veil of secrecy is thick and black. We need you to keep on reporting. And how about that Art Harris deal? Only in Bridgeport.

    0
  6. The sad part about it is all the success stories the City keeps hanging its hat on, especially the businesses moving into the Bijou Square development on Fairfield Avenue are victims of the bad image increased crime has created and are losing business. That is why no one jumped on the bandwagon and respond to Keila’s mention of these successes.

    0
  7. We all know there is enough political bullshit going on in City Hall to garner Keila Torres a Pulitzer Prize. I hope she maintains the balls she has shown and keeps up the pressure. Brain-dead registered voters will leap from their couches if they are reminded about how badly the politicians are screwing them.

    0
  8. yahooy, you use the words “brain-dead registered voters” and Mojo makes frequent reference to Zombieland. Are these references to the same phenomena regarding a public that knows precious little about City governance, apparently cares very little (based on using the right to vote) about who represents their interests, and have very little ‘skin in the game’ from their point of view?

    Political B.S. happens in all administrations, good ones and bad ones, because political actions keep the elected in office. But how are people being ‘screwed’ to use another word you have used? Is it through pathetic mismanagement of some public resources, in addition to a few hits and runs that make the news? Or is it because public resources, including taxpayer funds, hours of responsible work, etc. are “misused” in a manner that contravenes one or more laws?

    So “what we all know” is important to get reported and Keila and others would be the ones to tell. And if it is happening on the streets, the TIPS program reported by Keila Torres two weeks ago is another idea that allows people to inform enforcement authorities of specific info to help investigations, WITH FULL ANONYMITY. No chance of reprisal from using a TIPS envelope. Character and integrity shown by the community and supported by the media improve the quality of life. Time will tell.

    0

Leave a Reply