Ouch! Barack Has Work To Do

From the Q Poll:

October 6, 2011 – Obama And Economy Are In The Dumps, U.S. Voters Tell Quinnipiac University National Poll; End Saturday Mail To Cut Costs, Voters Say 4-1

American voters disapprove 55 – 41 percent of the job President Barack Obama is doing, an all-time low, and say 77 – 20 percent that the economy is in a recession, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today. Voters say 44 – 11 percent that the economy is getting worse, not better, while only 29 percent say the economy will improve if the president is re-elected.

Voters also disapprove 48 – 34 percent of the way Obama is handling the Israeli- Palestinian dispute. The president should be a strong supporter of Israel, voters say 63 – 20 percent, but they split 39 – 40 percent on whether Obama is a strong supporter, the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University survey finds.

The Israelis and the Palestinians are equally to blame for the failure to achieve Middle East peace, 64 percent of American voters say, while 22 percent blame the Palestinians and 6 percent blame the Israelis.

“The trend isn’t good for President Barack Obama. His disapproval has gone up 9 points since the summer, from 46 percent in July to 52 percent in September to 55 percent today,” said Peter A. Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute.

“Especially troubling for the president is that voters say 49 – 39 percent that Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney would do a better job on the economy. GOP contender Rick Perry would do only slightly better, voters say, and Republicans in Congress would not be much better.

“The president is stuck at a politically unhealthy level for someone who wants to be re- elected. His standing with the American people is obviously closely related to their views of the economy.”

The president’s job approval among Democrats, 77 – 18 percent, is lower than his disapproval among Republicans, 91 – 7 percent. Independent voters disapprove 56 – 38 percent.

Men disapprove 60 – 36 percent and women disapprove 51 – 46 percent. Black voters approve 81 – 15 percent, but disapproval is 62 – 34 percent among white voters and 50 – 45 percent among Hispanic voters.

Voters continue, however, to blame former President George W. Bush more than Obama for the economy, 51 – 32 percent, statistically unchanged from 53 – 32 percent in September.

“The political challenge for the president will be whether he can make voters believe his eventual GOP opponent is a carbon copy of the former president,” said Brown. “The fact that voters are unsure whether the economy will improve if he is re-elected is not a good sign for Obama.”

American sympathies on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remain strongly with the Jewish state, at 51 – 15 percent. Voters support the creation of a Palestinian state 44 – 35 percent, compared to 45 – 30 percent in June.

“Americans remain in Israel’s corner in the dispute with the Palestinians, but they think both sides have contributed to the problem,” said Brown.

U.S. Postal Service

To help solve the Postal Service’s financial problems, voters support 79 – 20 percent ending Saturday mail deliveries. Attitudes on other possible steps are:

• 53 – 45 percent in favor of closing local branches, including their own local branch;

• 57 – 38 percent opposed to providing additional federal funding;

• 60 – 38 percent support raising stamp prices.

Voters say 60 – 32 percent that it is unfair to call Social Security a “Ponzi scheme,” and by 50 – 32 percent they have a favorable opinion of the retirement system.

Social Security should continue to be run by the federal government, not the states, voters say 63 – 26 percent. Voters support 56 – 35 percent raising the income cap for Social Security taxes from its current $106,800 level.

From September 27 – October 3, Quinnipiac University surveyed 2,118 registered voters with a margin of error of +/- 2.1 percentage points. Live interviewers call land lines and cell phones.

The Quinnipiac University Poll, directed by Douglas Schwartz, Ph.D., conducts public opinion surveys in Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Florida, Ohio, Virginia and the nation as a public service and for research. For more data or RSS feed- www.quinnipiac.edu/polling.xml, call (203) 582-5201, or follow us on Twitter.

0
Share

48 comments

  1. Ouch? Did you just get a paper cut? You still have the Obama YouTube video up. Listen to the figures he gives in this speech and check them with the ones from www .dol.gov and tell me he knows his numbers. Notice the applause and keep in mind Himes, Blumenthal and all the leaders present haven’t said a word about the inaccuracy in his speech. Or were they lies?

    0
      1. Ron,
        Here are some questions:
        How have our lives improved under the present administration?
        Are people still losing homes?
        What jobs have been created?
        How many more 100s of millions will be spent on bailouts?

        Now we have a GOP-controlled house and a Democratic-controlled senate. Do you know what that means? No changes until the 2012 election. When the Dems controlled the presidency, house and senate they did not create jobs or help the economy. But we did get a nice new health care bill rammed down our throats and a trillion-dollar debt!

        0
        1. burman, let’s say you are right (I don’t agree). Which Republican candidate has a plan that will get them their nomination and then win the election for president? What is that plan that answers your questions to me?

          0
          1. Ron,
            Much like Bridgeport, is voting the same incompetent person into office better than changing the channel? Don’t think along party lines, three LONG years and Obama has done zip, except run up a record-setting debt. Do we as a country need more of that?

            0
          2. And in answer to your question, not staying with the status quo and keeping an incompetent leader in office. No jobs, no end to the recession, time to go Barack.

            0
        2. “Now we have a GOP-controlled house and a Democratic-controlled senate. Do you know what that means?”

          Here are some questions:
          How have our lives improved under the present administration? No. The Republicans have blocked or otherwise interfered with all Democrat-initiated legislation that might have provided solutions.

          Are people still losing homes? Yes. Until the Republicans agree to unite with the Democrats and quit worrying about who will occupy the White House next, no meaningful legislation will be enacted that will relieve this situation.

          What jobs have been created? Not nearly enough. All of us Republicans and Democrats are hurting because of the Beltway bottleneck.

          How many more 100s of millions will be spent on bailouts? Probably no more.

          0
  2. Ron, we will never know. What we have in Washington is a bunch of professional politicians both Republican & Democrat who have done nothing to put Americans back to work. They are still arguing over it. The first two years Obama had a Democratically controlled house and senate. Now the Republicans control the house. Still no jobs.
    It’s amazing, Obama names Jeff Imelt from GE as the job czar and lo and behold GE announces they are building another factory in China.
    All of these politicians know China charges us 20% on imports and we charge China 5%.
    Ron, as far as I am concerned the only candidate I like is Herman Cain, he speaks so I can understand what he is saying.

    0
    1. The US Senate will block anything because instead of just needing 50 votes with the vice president breaking ties you need 60 votes to get things passed out of the Senate, that’s why when Scott Brown won in Mass, it was all over. The Republican majority leader said from day one his job was to make sure Obama did not get reelected and that is the mission the House and Senate have done.

      0
      1. The key here, Ron, is President Obama was the lesser of two evils. It’s wonderful a man of color has risen to the presidency, but this person was extraordinarily unprepared. He had no administrative background, two thin years as a senator in Washington, no business experience, and was backed by extreme left-wingers who have taken advantage of his naivete. Herman Cain has a more impressive resume and a distinct plan for economic recovery. The Republicans (and I’m a lifelong Democrat) have a successful businessman and former governor who has dealt with political flies and leeches and knows the ins and outs of government. They also have Cain, a strong businessman with a conservative and sensible point of view. A Romney/Cain ticket is really what we need to get this country back on track.
        Scott Brown won in Massachusetts because the Democratic nominee was so ‘entitled’ to her ‘anointment,’ she refused to campaign with the people of Massachusetts. He went to the factory towns that were hurting, he campaigned at Fenway Park for the traditional NHL outdoor game. She refused saying it was too cold … and there’s your basic answer. Representatives need to respond to the people, not be anointed and entitled.
        We need leadership and President Obama is not a leader. Mind you he has almost $1 BILLION in his coffers to get re-elected. That’s a lot of money that could be doing a lot of good for the country and it won’t. And that is embarrassing.

        0
  3. *** Just who’s to blame is the question, no? Ask the Dems, they say it’s the Republicans, the GOP says it’s the Dems. All in the name of political pandering instead of getting the country headed back in the right direction! We need more voters showing they care & are fed up like the Wall St. protesters. Let’s hope the movement sprouts wings & continues its momentum towards getting rid of the power mongers in Wash DC come 2012. *** STOP OVERSPENDING, INVEST IN ECONOMIC INFRASTRUCTURE, BUY USA-MADE PRODUCTS, SUPPORT OUR TROOPS, CONTROL THE BANKS, REDUCE FOREIGN AID, PROTECT ALL US BORDERS, CLEAN ENERGY, CREATE JOBS, ETC. … ***

    0
  4. The only chance the Republicans had to capture the white house was Gov. Christie. Now it is really Obama’s to lose.The Republican hopefuls are a sad pathetic lot, religious freaks and racists. I think Herman Cain had promise but he is just another freak of a different color!

    0
  5. Here we go again!!! We are talking about party designation and not the individual. Here in the northeast we vilify the Republicans, out in the midwest they vilify the Democrats. So nothing changes. Let me ask:
    1. Are you better off today than you were three years ago?
    2. Is American manufacturing and exports better today than they were three years ago?
    3. Is the American job market better off today than it was three years ago?
    4. Are the poor better off today than they were three years ago?
    5. Are the rich better off today than they were three years ago?
    Steve, why is Cain a freak of a different color? Is it because he is a Republican? We have to stop voting by party affiliation and start voting for the person regardless of party affiliation.

    0
    1. town committee, Herman Cain had a interview with FOX news’ Chris Wallace and Wallace asked him to explain his 9-9-9 plan and who said it would work and who put the plan together and Cain could not answer the question.

      0
      1. Not true … Cain has explained his so-called 9-9-9 plan and it makes economic sense. I suggest you listen to his entire campaign and wait until he’s finished before commenting. I listened to the same and he did answer the question.

        0
    2. I do like some Republicans. I do not feel Obama is doing an awful job given the crap he was handed and the Republicans blocking every initiative he has tried to initiate. If there was one candidate who could have persuaded me to vote Republican it was Gov. Christie. I used to like Herman Cain. I find him to be a racist. I did not like his comments about Muslims and I do not think he is electable. Last time my first choice was Hilary Clinton. I have come to respect Obama. If the current Republican platform was not so pathetically homophobic concerning themselves with fighting gay marriage, gays in the military and every other unimportant issue I would give them the time of day. To me they are socially backwards and non progressive. If there was a Reagan-like candidate I would change my tune. I do not see a Republican president in the next five years.

      0
      1. The Republicans have ALLOWED the Tea Party to take over their Party thereby forcing the Republican candidates for president to run to the far right in order to get the nomination. By doing that they lose those independant voters who are not crazy about Obama but they see him as a good man but they find the Republicans have no answers to the problems except cutting taxes for the super rich.

        0
    1. Do you really believe Herman Cain can go the distance? Please say no! It will be Romney. Should have been Christie. Will remain Obama and things will start to move in a positive direction in the spring. Republicans really could have made an impact but by some divine force a bunch of losers who believe g-d sent them some divine message to run. I am going to throw up now. G-d sent us Michele Bachmann. “Pray away the Gay” and her husband is a sad flaming closeted queen. That pretty much represents the Republican party as well as Rick Perry who is a bad clone of George Bush who had a prayer meeting with thousands of evangelists and believes he is ordained by G-d. He has lots of explaining to do to the Black community, like he would get their vote anyway about the “N” word on his property. Just put a white sheet over his head and I think you have the grand dragon himself. These people are religious freaks and would like to bring this world back to pre-1960s mentality.

      0
      1. Don’t really know what I am doing with the presidential race yet … need more input! However, so far I have this to say to Barack:
        “Oh no you didn’t” and we don’t have the time to waste on another four years of “maybe this time he can.”

        0
  6. Cain makes a lot of sense. Thanks for the link tc, and I like Bob’s idea of a Romney/Cain partnering. Romney is middle of the road enough to pick up votes and I like Cain’s economic views.

    0
  7. Boy, I started some serious discussion here. I noticed no one answered the question nor it seems anyone clicked on the October 2010 Bridgeport speech by Obama. That’s what Lennie means when he describes my writing as “provocative.” Maybe the Democrats should hire me to help them avoid making so many mistakes with their speeches and positions. Or maybe the Republicans should hire me to help them point them out. Obama is just a smooth talker and I’ve said that a long time ago and plenty of times.
    Obama’s first mistake was in his first meeting with Republicans when he said to them “I won.” In other words, it was all about Obama and we all know there is no ‘I’ in TEAM.
    Obama’s second and biggest mistake was firing Howard Dean as Chairman of the DNC. Dean was the man who raised the Democratic Party and delivered the victory which Obama took and claimed full credit. When Obama left his church of 20 years because of a disagreement with his pastor, I posed a question here on OIB: If Obama can’t handle and deal with a disagreement with his pastor of 20 years, how can he deal and handle disagreements with the US House of Rep. and the US Senate? Hillary Clinton was and still is a better candidate for US President than Obama was.
    You all can criticize the Republicans all you want. The majority of Americans have been voicing their opinions in the polls where it counts. The same way Obama was shoved down our throats and we had to accept it, we must learn to accept the Republicans washing Obama down our throats.
    I’ve been hearing lots of political gossip on the 999 Plan. Rumor has it the 999 Plan’s real purpose is to take out the administration at 999 Broad Street, Bridgeport, Connecticut not the Obama Administration. Any truth to this, Lennie?

    0
  8. John McCain was the Republican choice to run against Obama so for those who don’t like Obama’s decisions I would like know what would President McCain have done differently or for that matter what would the Republican Party do.

    Let’s not forget President Bush was left a surplus from President Clinton and in 8 years the surplus was gone, he got us into two wars he didn’t pay for, he gave tax cuts to the rich without paying for it and and he made a deal with the pharmaceutical industry to pass their costs on to their customers and the economy of the country failing, the housing boom gone. This what President Obama had waiting for him on day one.

    0
    1. You know what, Ron? I can dig your response. Bush was a creep, no doubt. He had no idea, and I would venture to guess he had some financial stakes in the middle East concerning oil. I am NOT a Republican. I just wish Obama would have done more research and statistical analysis on the probability of him having success with ALL of those promises he made during the days of “YES WE CAN.” I did NOT vote for him. But I was more than willing to remain hopeful he could make his promises come to fruition. He was in over his head from way before day one, and that obvious fact was enough to make me vote Republican, regardless of Palin (who was NOT, by the way running for president, John McCain was).

      0
      1. Joel, this is exactly what I said earlier, Bush and McCain pointed this out years ago, but the Dems in the House and Senate blocked and ignored this. So in conclusion Ron (thank you Joel for the links), the Dems put us into this mess, not Bush.

        0
    2. The Dems in the House and Senate did the damage with Fannie and Freddie, it is what destroyed our economy. The president can’t do much when the House and Senate vote against everything. It is our country’s system of checks and balances. The Dems had control and they ran us into the ground.

      Ron, since we are discussing the economy, how do you explain Obama tripling the national debt? Or giving $535 million to a company that went bankrupt shortly after getting the bailout?

      0
  9. Let’s say Obama is over his head with the problems this country is facing. The question I have is what is the Republican plan? Answer, cut taxes. Well, if cutting taxes were such a great idea what happened during the eight years of President George W. Bush and those tax cuts? This country had a surplus under President Clinton who did not cut taxes. This country is still waiting for the Republican plan.

    0
      1. The country is divided. We’ve all heard this statement before. Recently we’ve heard the term “Class Warfare” to describe the back and forth battle to tax the rich more, equally or less.

        In simple terms, “polarization” means a black person is most likely to vote for a black candidate and vice versa. In 2008 I saw a glimmer of hope in that a black presidential candidate actually won in predominantly white and Republican areas of the country. What I found interesting was the fact these people voted for Obama over Hillary Clinton–a white female and wife of a former US President. I’m sure their dislike of her husband had a lot to do with this. Regardless of their reasons, the majority–including independents–voted Obama in. What I see happening in America and the world is: Class Guerrilla Warfare, Religious Guerrilla Warfare, Racial Guerrilla Warfare and any other types of warfare readers can add here or think of. The best part of all this warfare taking place is the weapons used by all guerrillas involved is: The Ball Point Pen or the likes thereof.

        0
  10. Ron,
    This country is still waiting for Obama to create jobs he promised THREE YEARS AGO, and end the recession.

    Do you see he is in over his head and doesn’t give a damn about anyone?

    We as a country need CHANGE!

    0
    1. Once again, let’s say Obama is over his head. Now please tell me what is the Republican job plan? George Bush never vetoed a spending bill, after 8 years with Bush and now with the Republican Party, what is their job plan? Never mind, I know. Tax cuts for the rich.

      0
  11. I blame neither the Republicans nor the Democrats for the collapse of our financial well being. The fat-cat financiers saw great benefit to themselves at the horrendous expense of the common man when they devised the Voodoo Money concept that put so much capital out there to the beck and call of the the unworthy and the unworthy spent it like drunken sailors. If you take a careful look at the default structures you will see the unworthy before the collapse paid back in interest the initial amount borrowed plus a healthy amount of additional interest making default and foreclosures profitable. The fat cats didn’t care, they got their initial investments back and probably twice that before the balloon burst. They walked away with huge profits offset by huge losses making their taxable burden next to nothing. They were smart and we were assholes for taking part in it. Next time a slick mortgage broker chats you up and says he or she is willing to loan you 150% of the fair market value of the house you want to buy despite your less than stellar credit history, kick him or her in the balls.

    Obama was not a great choice although I voted for him and will vote for him again unless the Democrats put up a reasonably better prospect.

    If Obama was a better president he would have kicked John Boehner squarely in the balls for interfering with absolutely every bit of legislation Obama attempted that might have alleviated the current mess we are in.

    The Republicans want to get back in the White House at all costs. Just like Finch wants to preserve his 6-figure salary. Finch and the Republicans are willing to do and say anything that will make that happen.

    0
  12. yahooy,
    Let me guess, you vote the party line national just like locally, right? Forget about what could be better if it comes from the other party. People, stop looking at parties and look at the individual!

    0
  13. At church this morning, I had to listen to the priest make political commentary about the current state of affairs. Actually, what he said made sense. The man is brilliant. However, I don’t go to church to listen to political rhetoric. That pastor who proselytized Mary-Jane Foster was akin to the KKK just before the primary should be defrocked or sanctioned.

    This nation was founded upon, among other things, a true separation of church and state. Yet today we are bombarded with religious innuendo that has absolutely nothing to do with qualifications for election. I would never vote for Romney for myriad reasons. The fact he is a Mormon has no place in that decision making.

    You know, it is a matter of law. Why would it not be enforced?

    0
    1. yahooy, you mentioned being at church this morning, well this morning I happen to walk into church with Mary-Jane Foster. Candidates for mayor attend our church at election time and that’s it but MJF has been attending Mt. Aery before and after her unsuccessful run for mayor, in fact MJF has been at our church so many times I thought she was a member. I must say she is very comfortable and she gets involved with the service, she is singing and she knows the words to the songs and she is well liked.

      0

Leave a Reply