Bob Fredericks bleeds Bridgeport. He’s also unafraid to extract a pint of blood from wayward pols. This week he’s scheduled to return to the Connecticut Post, as managing editor, where he had previous stints as reporter and an editor. Fredericks is serving a life sentence in journalism. It’s what he knows and loves. His presence in the newsroom adds critical city knowledge base to corporate journalism’s dispassion to things local. He will fight for more local coverage. In time it will come. Don’t expect instant results.
Fredericks will need to figure out how best to deploy his peeps, assuming the corporate suits that set the newsroom budget allow him the latitude. Some journalists are only as good as the direction they are pointed, and Fredericks’ presence will help determine the right fit for the right scribe. The Post still has a nice foundation of scribes to educate readers about the things that go on in the state’s largest city. As we’ve debated here often, it’s incomprehensible the paper covering the state’s city has not one full-time scribe covering city hall. And that’s just the way the politicians like it. Journalists tend to have a sour disposition toward things, it’s the nature of the beast, and quietly Post reporters will tell you the sound of crickets is deafening in the newsroom, a product of cuts and spreading reporters thin and limited local news direction.
Fredericks might be able to increase the enthusiasm level. One thing’s for sure, he won’t allow anyone to mail it in. He has low tolerance for scribes who don’t do their homework. He’s neighborhood savvy. He’s supportive of the little peeps such as nonprofits, destination points, artists and musicians; but when it comes to power structures he’s like a little kid with matches and gasoline. Pols should keep a fire extinguisher handy.
“I want The Post to be a great local paper,” he wrote in an email to the Connecticut Post when the paper announced his hire a few weeks ago, “and that means a combination of aggressive investigative news, business and sports reporting with a good mix of thoughtful columns and interesting profiles and features about the places where we live and work.”
Fredericks was raised in the city’s East Side and has lived in Black Rock for more than 20 years. He graduated from Fairfield Prep in 1972 and Boston College in 1976. Good grief, Fredericks is pushing 60? Well, he’ll be a youthful 60.
Most recently Fredericks worked as a senior writer at the New York Post. He’ll enjoy a much shorter commute.
Something to watch: will Fredericks become a member of the The Connecticut Post Editorial Board? Editorial boards shape the opinion pages, independent of the newsroom, and endorse candidates for public office. Fredericks is suspicious about lending his name to opinions and sentences he doesn’t craft. Editorial board members must do that. It’s impossible for them to read and sign off on every editorial.
OIB has not spoken to Fredericks, a regular OIB reader, about his return to the Post other than greetings and salutations. It’s better to protect the innocent in a new venture.
When does he start, Lennie? I hope he doesn’t miss what’s coming. I’ve kind of lost my faith in the CT Post. So I post here and will soon be revealing interesting facts as Godiva2011 can attest to. I’ve teamed up with Jonathan Pelto. If you think I was ‘Pelting’ pols on OIB, just wait and see what’s coming.
I think we all deserve a laugh. Soon, certain people won’t be laughing. This YouTube video has gotten over 12 million hits in less than a week. I won!
www .youtube.com/watch?v=dX_1B0w7Hzc
That video isn’t funny; it’s obnoxious. No wonder it appealed to you, no one with a shard of intelligence would enjoy it.
I hope this guy is in a position to stop Mike Daly from writing about Ireland, family members, the family dog and other BS and write about what’s going on in Bridgeport.
He’s not. Daly will do his thing on the editorial page and Fredericks will do his thing, grinding out daily news copy.
At least he knows where the East Side and East End are.
Fredericks is just what the Post, and Bridgeport, need. An Editor with brains, balls and a nose for objective, no-holds-barred relevant, local reporting.
That’s too bad; someone should review what he writes.
I’ll have to see it to believe it.
I don’t care if it is Daly, or daily or Fredericks of East Side or Fredericks of Hollywood.
After reading that puff piece on KJ, I am still waiting to see the CT Post come down heavy on the School Board issue.
It is too late for Bob Fredericks to do any real reporting on the Vallas Admin, just vote NO until all the facts are kNOwn.
I hope Mr. Fredericks can put a stop to the fluff pieces that are constantly showing up in this feel-good newspaper.
The latest fluff piece is by Bill Cummings who writes about the visit of Kevin Johnson, the mayor of Sacramento California.
He makes it sound like Johnson is the second coming of a mayor in favor of an appointed BOE. Mr. Johnson has not been pushing for such a board in his city where the BOE is elected.
Mr. Cummings should have researched Kevin Johnson before he wrote this piece. He should have talked about Mr. Johnson’s history with the Justice Department and the history of some of his cabinet members with the Justice Department. Did he do this? NO. This is the kind of slipshod reporting we have been subject to for years. Research, research and more research before writing bullshit.
Maybe a good argument for our elected leaders!
www .themoneyillusion.com/?p=17208
Andy:
Johnson was merely a visiting fireman to help the administration push its charter proposal. The reporter reported what the guy said. That’s what the reporter is supposed to do in that situation.
The reporter reported the politician said you are not giving up rights by giving up your vote.
You can figure out the rest:
When a politician says you aren’t giving up any rights by giving up your right to vote, you are giving up your rights.
Jim, you maybe right but the guy is using his title of Mayor of Sacramento as a way of saying he has expertise in this area.
When you check this guy out you find he is the last person who should be here telling us about the school system.
What you are saying is the reporter if he is doing a story on Bernie Madoff the reporter should just say he is a famous financial adviser.
Maybe there should not have been a story written about Johnson at all.
Andy: Ta da! You just hit topic number one among reporters and editors yakking about this kind of stuff. How much weight do we give to a guy’s statements when we report about them?
How much context do you give to a guy? Do you leave it alone? When are you poking your opinions into a story too much? As old as journalism.
The guy is an elected official from a bigger city with an interest in education. He may attract interest because of hoops too. One reason Mayor Johnson has some interest here is he is an ELECTED official from a CITY with problems he has to deal with. Gives him SOME standing.
Here we have an elected official recommending to people you can do without that election stuff. People should be able to figure out what that means if it is reported square.
If another writer wants to connect dots, they can do that. Reporters should stay out of it.
Reporters report. On Madoff I figure a reporter might be able to say “disgraced financial adviser convicted of robbing clients” and note he’s been sent to jail for the rest of his life.
I’m sure some would rather say “scum-sucking weasel who robbed widows and orphans.”
Can’t please everybody. I’m pretty tempted by that last phrase myself.
Bagley should have low-posted KJ!
Jim Johnson was here because of his wife and her ties to education. I could see him being here if he were trying to do the same thing Finch is trying to do. You can bet his wife will benefit if the people of Bridgeport vote Yes.
There is no doubt Johnson has an impressive resume but he also has a lot of warts but whatever. Nice talking to you.
Independent local news coverage is lacking today. As we approach the Charter Revision vote, we provide two programs, one in favor and the other opposing, on ‘Bridgeport Now live,’ Ch88 at 8pm
Tomorrow, Tuesday Oct 23rd: why a “Yes” vote is good for the city, with special guest from Excel Bridgeport. Then, on Tuesday Oct 30th: why a “No” vote is good for the city with a special guest.
But Bridgeportmeow …
A Yes vote is not good for the city? See, even you are buying the Finch lie.
*** WELCOME BACK, THERE ARE PLENTY OF POLITICAL SWEATHOGS TO WRITE ABOUT IN BPT, NO? ***