In a commentary first published in the Connecticut Post, former Mayor John Fabrizi contrasts his years as mayor with Bill Finch claiming “The present administration’s approach to economic progress uses a technique to show progress by color chart.” Fabrizi has formed an exploratory committee for mayor. His commentary follows:
How many cities, anywhere, can boast of anything resembling Seaside Park–300 green acres on beautiful Long Island Sound? How many cities have a Beardsley Park–a beautiful wooded place that contains a historic zoo that maintains an endangered species breeding program? And then there’s Veteran’s Memorial park–another beautiful wooded space with state-of-the-art playing fields that benefit the entire city. I’m very proud that my administration created those playing fields for the youth and residents of Bridgeport.
Bridgeport is the home of two world-class hospital/trauma centers–Saint Vincent’s Medical Center and Bridgeport Hospital. How many cities of our size can boast of two such facilities?
Of course, we must not forget our very own university, the University of Bridgeport–one of the most innovative institutions in the country–an institution at the very forefront of alternative medicine, distance learning and engineering, not to mention the other cutting-edge programs and national firsts, such as their renowned nutrition program and dental hygiene program. In addition, this university is the economic driver of Bridgeport’s South End.
Bridgeport is a very special place–a city purposefully carved-out of its surroundings by serious people of vision as a place of prosperity, beauty, and opportunity.
Consider our proud history as we were once referred to as the premier industrial city of the world, the Arsenal of Democracy.
Now, I’m not a person who sees the world through rose-colored glasses. I’m a realist and a problem solver. I know how far we have fallen since our glory days. While I remember how Bridgeport shined in the past, we have descended from a place where factories crowded our developed areas and jobs outnumbered workers, to a place where square miles of industrial land remain fallow and where real unemployment is sky-high, with Bridgeporters having to travel hours a day to other cities and towns to make a living.
Where we used to have clean, peaceful, orderly neighborhoods populated by working families, we now have large blighted areas populated by the unemployed and underemployed.
These places in our city cause me great distress when I drive through them. These places make me comment to myself, this is not the Bridgeport in which I was born and raised and have chosen to spend my life here. This is not the Bridgeport that I envisioned and worked hard to revitalize as Mayor.
Some would say that we are on our way back. While we do have pockets of prosperity in our city, unfortunately the vast majority of our residents are in a state of protracted economic distress.
When I served as mayor, I made bringing good jobs to our city and expanding our tax base my top priorities. I brought in the Urban Land Institute to begin the community discussion and governmental planning in helping plot Bridgeport’s future. I talked to major corporations about locating facilities and jobs in Bridgeport. I lobbied hard for help in Hartford and Washington to get the Steel Point project in motion. I brought in the Royal Bank of Scotland and hundreds of good jobs to downtown Bridgeport and even convinced Pitney Bowes to locate facilities here, employing many Bridgeporters.
These gains, and much more have been lost by an administration that puts much more stock in appearing “green” and enlightened to the suburbs than in bringing jobs and real “green” to the pockets of Bridgeporters.
Cities such as Stamford undertake development in the billions of dollars at a time. Since I left office, Bridgeport can’t even hold on to the determined Bridgeport businesses that had previously struggled successfully for decades to remain. The current city administration just lost the RBS jobs that I worked so hard to bring here.
The progress that I made with the state and UI in regard to the Steel Point development project have since been replaced with complications and false promises of ground-breaking and building–but not with the type of lucrative development that was poised to occur under my administration. Instead of mixed-use to higher-end housing, hotels and restaurants, we’re getting a lower-return anchor that will bring few jobs and little in the way of taxes.
The present administration’s approach to economic progress uses a technique to show progress by color chart. How “green” are we? What is our carbon abatement in this regard? How much “green power” are we producing? I’m left with one question: How much in the “pocket” green have residents saved?
We need real development and tax-base growth in the billions of dollars. The present city administration, even with help from the State, has not created the development that we need and in addition have not grown the tax base.
It appears that a catastrophic tax hike awaits us. It’s my estimation that our tax increase for our real estate property and cars will increase by double digit percentages for many of us residing here. Why do you think that the delay in implementing the new property assessments have been delayed to right after the next mayoral election and not right before it?
This administration takes credit for progress in education and school construction that were actually put in place by my administration. Check the records: the only progress made by this administration in regard to the public school system was in getting outraged citizens to turn out in record numbers to vote against the mayor’s attempted take-over of the democratically elected school system. Thank goodness that his illegal, state-assisted, anti-democratic, anti-public school coup d’etat was overturned by the courts and the people of Bridgeport.
While I served as Mayor, I had a grand vision for our city that needed nurturing and direction.
As mayor, I envisioned a city that would once again be the destination of technological innovators and visionary capital. A place where jobs outnumbered workers and where the tax-base allowed modest taxation of business and residents while providing for a strong level of funding for public education, public safety, and all other sectors of City government. I want to serve Bridgeport as mayor again. Today, I am still the same man with a passion and vision for Bridgeport, but I am a wiser man that has been tried by fire and learned the important lessons of life in the process.
I want to take Bridgeport to the same type of magical place that P.T. Barnum saw for us 150 years ago and that I envisioned for it as your mayor.
I don’t want Bridgeport to be sold short by those that would exploit us for political gain.
I want to bring the real “green” back to Bridgeport. The kind of green that you can take to the bank and put in your pocket, the kind of green that can make Bridgeport a better place to live, work and raise a family.
I envision a Bridgeport that would make P.T. Barnum proud. Bridgeport needs innovators, inventors and motivated citizens to get our city back on the path of prosperity.
As Bridgeporters, let’s all work together to build a better Bridgeport, a place where hope lives and promise beckons.
Harpooned or lampooned, John Fabrizi has pointed out many of the vulnerabilities of the Finch administration. And they can be attacked by anyone who is outside the system.
I hope and would encourage John to use his knowledge of municipal administration and management to begin to develop and articulate the actual necessary strategic and tactical moves he embraces in his first hundred days, for instance. Our City population has long since tagged Finch with the phony $600 tax credit. So much for an approach to honest and open budgeting six years into his terms. Keep it secret. Keep people in the dark. Read the posts on Only In Bridgeport to get a sense of how Bridgeport not only operates today, but also as a directory of how it should be working according to Statute, Charter, Ordinance and rules of order.
We have never been able to spend the Finch tax credit. The fact he stated it was an introduction to his lack of municipal fiscal savvy in contrast to his innate desire to attempt to make everybody happy with him even if it means speaking falsehoods.
What departments will look different and why? How much can the City operating budget decrease due to elimination of line items that are never spent in the manner budgeted (ghost expenses), to termination of low-priority City services that can be outsourced without compromise of quality and that lower ongoing expense, to training of City personnel that increases their abilities and value to the City faster than their compensation and benefits increase, and to regular and dependable evaluation processes for people and programs that is shared with the taxpaying public. Are there other items to add to the list??? Go for it. Time will tell.
Sounds like a campaign speech to me …
Very impressive speech. I’d say game on! Now let’s see what the Mayor can pull off immediately to let the air out of this. Steelepointe and University of Bridgeport. Nice.
The ghost of Machiavelli jumped into my front seat in downtown Bridgeport and told me to blog this to John Fabrizi: If you’ve been a BOE employee your entire career, you’ve witnessed the world through rose-colored glasses. Your brand of reality made headlines in an awkward way and upon retirement you will receive several lifetime guarantees from The City of Bridgeport. Don’t be surprised if adult education becomes your Achilles heel.
Fabs brought us many movie stars filming in Bridgeport, I liked that.
Look at the picture of Fabrizi and Finch taken three years ago when he endorsed Finch. What do you think Fabrizi whispered to Finch during that handshake? Answer: I make you, I break you.
Fabrizi has been saying a lot, but he hasn’t said what he really needs to get across to people–where to send the contributions. Lennie, have you extend an invitation to the blog?
Will Mayor John bring this City back to Greatness? He just might!
Lol, gotta love Johnny Fabs, there’s no doubt he loves our city, he loved being mayor, he loves to shake hands and make promises. But he had his chance, and we all know how that ended up. Time for a fresh face, fresh ideas …
Yes, I too thing it was a very impressive speech and here is someone speaking positively about the University of Bridgeport unlike what Mayor Finch’s views are of UB. Well, not a bad start. Now who else will join the race and hopefully they will do like John Fabrizi with their own statement and positions.
John Fabrizi is a politician.
Bill Finch is a politician.
As Lennie has pointed out to us, Finch has the personality more typical of a legislator. He has passion for nebulous concepts that will reflect well on him and not require heavy lifting.
Fabrizi approaches every day as a to-do list. He approached his role as mayor in a broad range of ways. He was a cheerleader at one moment and a problem solver the next.
To use a comparison often used in business school curriculum, Finch uses the approach of a leader, Fabrizi sees himself as a manager. Finch did the right thing (Green initiatives) and Fabrizi did things right (the to-do list).
Are we ready to endorse a different approach? Well, it’s up to the DTC.
When I hear a candidate tell us he or she will make hiring a well-respected company to do a real fiscal investigation of the City’s budget, and this would be a top priority on day one of the job, then I’ll start listening. Otherwise it’s all just pandering.
BB, I do not recall whether or what type of financial audit was performed when the state-appointed Review Board took over Bridgeport’s management at the end of the Bucci administration. I do recall a review of management practices was done which resulted in the Ukeles Study (named after the management consultant) detailing some best practices and policies to guide the city. I don’t doubt if you were to enter the grand hall of architects’ renderings (Ferry Boat Junction; Renaissance Plaza; Harbor Point, etc.), you could find a copy, dust it off and put it to use immediately. I think the info contained is as relevant today as it was 25 years ago.
flub,
Aren’t we at a moment where we can gather a list on OIB of things the Charter directs, of Ordinance items that are ignored, of practical ideas to open the flow of info through technology, etc. and see what candidates say about the listed topics?
Several years ago I became involved in a public argument with Tom Sherwood. Of course, there are so few opportunities to engage Mr. Sherwood and I was pushing for the production of 12 monthly financial reports by the fourth Friday of the following month, per the Charter. I especially was pursuing the 12th month June report.
Tom Sherwood stated this was something that had not been done since the Financial Review Board. I did not know enough City history to challenge that comment. I did know what the Charter said. Rather than add to the heat of the moment, I backed off.
The next day I called the former Chair of that group, David Carson and shared the statement of Tom Sherwood with him. He chuckled and said Sherwood’s memory might be accurate but that was no problem to the Financial Review Board because they had access to every City account down to the last penny. Obviously that group had ULTIMATE TRANSPARENCY. They knew what to look for, how to get complete information and had the right to questions and expect answers. OPEN and ACCOUNTABLE response as well.
We do not have that from City Hall today. Why not? Is the act of asking questions a form of rebellion? It seems to be.
Forensic audits are raised often as if they were a solution. Immediately they appear as an expense. What if a new CEO asked everybody to read the Charter with a focus on how their Department is affected? What does the Charter and Ordinances call for? Easy? Good start? You bet. Will that still require watchdogs and monitoring? Yes again. Will this happen? Time will tell.
www .walkerworthyformayor.com/opinion_first_100_days_as_mayor_of_trenton_a_plan_for_immediate_action
Like this guy. This is the kind of stuff I want to hear from whomever is running for the Mayor of Bridgeport.
I don’t care to hear about how or why a candidate romanticizes the city. I don’t care to hear what he or she thinks is great about it, or what he or she thinks is wrong with it. I don’t care about passionate pep talks and I really don’t care to hear anyone put down another candidate or sling garbage around.
What I do want to hear about is someone who has a head for business, and who knows how create a real plan that can turn the ship around. I don’t care about fluff. Save that for romance novels. Give me someone who is a good administrator and business person, someone who will start from scratch, and someone who is not afraid of upsetting the status quo. Pure and simple, I want to hear your business plan, and I want to know you are going to follow it.