With input from the City Attorney’s Office, the Public Safety Committee on Monday passed a resolution “calling for enhanced transparency and accountability with the Department of Homeland Security.” The effort was led by City Councilman Joe Cruz and co-sponsored by several peers.
Bridgeport hasn’t received ICE attention like other Connecticut communities but backers of the resolution say several residents have been taken into custody that had immigration status and no criminal records. For additional background see here
The language will appear before the full council at the Nov. 3 meeting. Resolution follows:
By: Councilman Jorge Cruz
Cosponsors: Councilmembers Denese Taylor-Moye, Alfredo Castillo, Jeanette Herron, Richard Ortiz, Maria Valle, Eneida Martinez, Ernest Newton and Dasha Spell
WHEREAS, the City of Bridgeport, CT values its ethnic, racial, and socio-economic diversity, and the Bridgeport City Council is committed to enabling all our residents to live and pursue their livelihoods in peace and prosperity with stable and united families; and
WHEREAS, Bridgeport’s residents are known for welcoming with open arms immigrants from nations around the world to Connecticut’s most populous city, and the City Council approved a Welcoming City resolution May 15, 2017 to publicly pronounce that position; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bridgeport bears the responsibility for providing local public safety services for all its residents and the Bridgeport City Council maintains its strong support of Bridgeport’s status as a Welcoming City; and
WHEREAS, in serving and protecting all City residents, the Bridgeport Police Department does not stop, detain, arrest or transfer individuals based solely on real or perceived immigration status or warrantless immigration detainers or administrative warrants; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with City Ordinance 2.125 TRUST Enforcement Act, the Bridgeport Police Department fully complies with all federal laws; and does not, and will not, attempt to prevent United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or Department of Homeland Security (DHS) or any other federal law enforcement agency from acting independently in their efforts to locate and detain undocumented immigrants; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Bridgeport believes in upholding the due process rights enshrined in the United States Constitution and laws, including those afforded to undocumented persons within the United States; specifically, the Fifth Amendment provides that “No person shall ….be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law,;” (emphasis added), and
WHEREAS, this Resolution is not intended to, and will not, obstruct, hinder, or interfere with the legal exercise of federal immigration enforcement authority, but rather is intended to, and will, enhance transparency, accountability, and public safety within the City; and
WHEREAS, according to a Connecticut Public Radio report[1] published in May 2025, there have been at least 12 Bridgeport undocumented immigrant residents who have been arrested recently by federal law enforcement officials (at least some of whom had no criminal record and were not suspected of any illegal activity other than their immigration status), resulting in a palpable sense of fear and unease in our neighborhoods; and
WHEREAS, certain law enforcement activities have been conducted by federal officers wearing face coverings, and without prior notice given to city officials; or sharing information about where these individuals are being transported to; and
WHEREAS, face coverings and lack of visible identification can pose significant safety risks[2] to local police officers who must be able to distinguish federal officers performing legitimate immigration enforcement actions from individuals impersonating ICE or other DHS agents, in order to harass or assault others, including vulnerable women; of which there have been various reported instances on the East Coast including in Georgia,[3] South Carolina,[4] North Carolina,[5] Maryland,[6] Pennsylvania,[7] and New York;[8] and
WHEREAS, the ability for the public to identify all law enforcement officers during interactions promotes professionalism, transparency, and accountability.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Bridgeport encourages local community groups, social service organizations, faith institutions, legal service entities, immigrant advocacy support societies, and other interested agencies to engage in ongoing public education and awareness campaigns throughout the Bridgeport community to inform our residents of their due process rights and how to legally exercise them when interacting with law enforcement agencies and when navigating the civil immigration and criminal legal system; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council hereby calls upon all federal law enforcement agencies to limit their immigration enforcement action within the City of Bridgeport to those operations targeting undocumented immigrants who have, or are suspected of having, committed felony offenses or crimes of violence, or are known gang members, and/or otherwise pose a serious safety threat to the community, in order to improve public safety in Bridgeport; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council hereby calls upon all of its federal elected representatives in Congress to urge federal immigration officials to cease all immigration raids at public places unless the undocumented immigrants have, or are suspected of having, committed felony offenses or crimes of violence, or are known gang members, and/or otherwise pose a serious safety threat to the community, as such activities create palpable fear and disruption in the community; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that no City of Bridgeport department, including the Bridgeport Police Department and its officers or employees, shall collect, request, retain, or disclose any information about an individual’s immigration or citizenship status, national origin, or place of birth for the purpose of civil immigration enforcement. This includes refraining from entering such information into any local or federally accessible database, unless required by state or federal law; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City of Bridgeport and its departments shall not grant direct or indirect access to any city-operated surveillance or automated data system — including but not limited to license plate readers, CCTV or traffic cameras, predictive policing tools, or biometric databases — to any federal agency for immigration enforcement purposes, except pursuant to a valid, specific judicial warrant, unless otherwise required by state or federal law; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, unless prohibited by state or federal law the Bridgeport Police Department shall, on at least a monthly basis, publicly disclose all requests received from federal immigration authorities — including but not limited to ICE or DHS — for information, access, or assistance of any kind. Reports must include the date, nature, legal basis (if any), and whether the city complied, partially complied, or denied the request; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, no City of Bridgeport department, including the Police Department, or any of its employees, shall participate in any joint task force, operation, training, or information-sharing arrangement with federal immigration enforcement agencies, where the primary purpose involves civil immigration enforcement or removal. This prohibition applies regardless of which agency is the lead, unless required by state or federal law; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, no department may enter into, renew, or extend any contract, agreement, or memorandum of understanding with a private vendor, data broker, or non-governmental entity that permits, enables, or facilitates access to city-generated data or surveillance systems by federal immigration enforcement agencies — unless required by state or federal law or specific judicial warrant. For any existing contracts that can’t be immediately amended or terminated for legal or practical reasons, the City should take all legally permissible steps to restrict the use, disclosure, or sharing of such data for immigration enforcement purposes. That could include imposing access limitations through internal policy, administrative controls, or technical safeguards wherever possible; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council hereby calls upon every member of the community to contribute time, resources, and financial support to existing nonprofits, community service organizations, faith-based organizations, businesses, and labor unions so that all can unite in the common goal of assisting individuals and families impacted by the ICE immigrations raids; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, officers of the Bridgeport Police Department and employees of the City of Bridgeport shall not collaborate or support ICE’s efforts in the city, per the Trust Act; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED officers of the Bridgeport Police Department and employees of the City of Bridgeport shall not collaborate with, or support, ICE’s efforts in the city per the State of Connecticut’s Trust Act, unless required by state or federal law; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon passage of this resolution by the City Council of the City of Bridgeport, a copy of this resolution shall be submitted to State Senators and State Representatives of the City, as well as the City’s Federal Congressional delegation.
[1] Jim Haddadin, “ICE Arrests are up in Connecticut. Here’s Where Migrants were Apprehended,” Connecticut Public, July 3, 2025, https://www.ctpublic.org/news/investigative/2025-07-03/ice-arrests-connecticut-where-migrants-were-apprehended.
[2] Michael Gagne, “ICE Agents’ use of Masks in CT Causes Confusion and Panic: ‘They’re Supposed to be Public Servants’,” Stamford Advocate, July 3, 2025, https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/article/ice-agents-ct-masks-confusion-new-haven-danbury-20395223.php.
[3] Zak Cheney-Rice, “No One Can Tell Who’s a Cop Anymore: Masked criminals are impersonating ICE agents and police, preying on an already terrorized public.,” New York Intelligencer, July 28, 2025, https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/trump-immigration-ice-agents-masks-criminal-imposters.html.
[4] Artemis Moshtaghian, Gloria Pazmino and Nick Valencia, “Multiple ICE impersonation arrests made during nationwide immigration crackdown,” CNN, February 5, 2025, https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/04/us/ice-impersonators-on-the-rise-arrests-made-as-authorities-issue-national-warning.
[5] Aaron Thomas, “Police arrest Raleigh man accused of impersonating ICE officer and sexually assaulting woman,” WRAL News, January 27, 2025, https://www.wral.com/news/local/raleigh-police-arrest-man-impersonating-officer-sexual-assault-jan-2025/.
[6] Ava Blando and Simone Jacques, “Men Are Impersonating ICE to Attack Immigrant Women. MAGA Emboldened Them.,” Ms. Magazine, September 2, 2025, https://msmagazine.com/2025/07/10/men-impersonating-ice-agents-immigration-customs-attack-women-maga-trump/.
[7] Moshtaghian, Pazmino, and Valencia, “Multiple ICE impersonation arrests made.”
[8] Aaron Katersky, “Attempted rapist told victim he was an ICE agent: Police sources,” ABC News, February 12, 2025, https://abcnews.go.com/US/attempted-rapist-told-victim-ice-agent-police-sources/story?id=118741709.


There doesn’t seem to be a provision in this resolution that provides for intervention and assistance by the BPD, et al., if they witness the illegal assault and seizure of individuals by masked, unidentified agents. Will BPD intervene on behalf of individuals and civilian intervenors if they observe/are made aware of such instances?…
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,
That your weapon of choice ……..be put on ICE!
(Now ice becomes a homophone)
Disappointment noted for the OIB focus on Jorge Cruz’s resolution with 11 WHEREAS statements and 12 BE IT RESOLVED statements without seeing the ICE signs in the back of Council Chambers.
At public speaking I summarized notable City Council failure to review the current 1993 City Charter and to note a requirement that the City establish a Commission to deal with ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT and HOUSING. Would not a reading of that Charter indicate a duty of the City, and especially the City Council to act?
The revised Charter offers more balance to the City Council to execute activity as well as perform oversight of Boards and Commissions in the future. Where is the Mayor on the Charter? Have you heard any signal from his communications team to inform the voter of the substantial improvements to state our structure in a simpler and more organized manner, to create substance and strength to both a Legislative office as well as an Ethics Office to support restated authority for an Ethics Commission?
Stay tuned for two more Charter Chats held virtually for 90 minutes with free wheeling conversation and answers to questions about Bridgeport governance. Stay alert for how each Council person is approaching the CHarter questions. Time will tell.
City Council Comments- October 20, 2025
Ladies and gentlemen of the City Council, fellow citizens, neighbors, and friends who may hear or read my words, when the Charter Review Commission was introduced by the Mayor and City Council President in January 2024 elections that were troublesome to the body politic were working the way through State Election and Courts processes. Nobody was proud of the system that two years previously in fall 2021 invited 100% of registered voters to cast a ballot, yet fewer than 10% responded.
Council representatives were elected and then again two years later. But did low voting for Council representatives show up as a matter of concern to you, who move about the City as representatives of all the people? Perhaps this year’s election has more door knocking ongoing, but what is your message to the folks on a Commission for Economic Development and Housing that has been part of the 1993 Charter that was never acted upon?
Have voters celebrated the enhanced position of Ethics to deal with conflicts of interest, respond to genuine questions of faith-based morality, and create a real chance for the public to serve a participating role on a Commission? Or simplified the organization of Civil Service activities to save litigation, avoid conversion of political appointments into Civil Service positions, and again save taxpayer funds? Finally, will opening of appointment process, completion of assignments to current and future boards or commissions and requiring a written report annually to fellow citizen taxpayers improve governance, trust, and respect for our city from all? Time will tell.
John, speaking of words and definitions, coded or face value. I have defined my political affiliations.
I am a right leaning Democrat, socialist Republican, Independent capitalist. 🤣
However, in the spirit of Halloween, and that Port, being a one-party dictator, kingship, totalitarian rule. 😊
I will don the Democrat mask, Perhaps Bill Clinton 🙂
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qd20Oi5k_MU
Classic
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/P-jSWiTKYPM
Perhaps you ‘blather’ for your personal joy in writing rather than thinking through your comments and posting them for public consumption. That is your privilege from the Bill of Rights, and the courtesy and patience of Lennie Grimaldi.
Who cares what mask you wear, for Halloween, or on any day?
What do you have to report on the revised City Charter and whether you will include it in your vote? Are you even registered to vote at this time and exercise your voice to give notice of what you truly understand and believe? Wish to inform your neighbors or continue your disingenuity about ‘political affiliations’?
Time will tell.
Perhaps, but if natural born males and females can identify with the opposite gender surely, I can identify with a diverse political spectrum.
That being said, it is fairly an accurate depiction of my political perspective, Identity that falls in my passion inner being.
I can report that I was one of 15 people in Port CC chamber hall present when the CC voted on, as were you.
I am now a register kingship D party rule. I voted in practically every election since the frist time I voted in 2015, G2’s comeback mayoral race. 🙂
Perhaps my words come-out foul and offensive, but noting disingenuous about them, for the most part, legally, criminality speaking.
As to truth, what is truth? Right Jim Caviezel? Like beauty, it is set in the eye of the beholder. My no means am I saying I am never wrong. However, being wrong and knowingly lie should not be confused.
Right, JC 🙂
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJffBsSg1kU&msockid=c736c238af7711f0974176de6e6b0d3e
As for my Democratic Halloween mask, there were not many options, Carter, Ford, Obama?
I would have “chosen” Obama, but that might back face and run afoul and offensive. 🙂
Besides, Bill tapped his inner Jazz. Arsenio Hall I kind of like Jazz, Blues. Port’s JazzFest should have high tempo blues incorporated in it line up. I hear it’s at Seaside next year.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/f9u2nHU-_6c
With regards to my privilege from the Bill of Rights, and the courtesy and patience of Lennie Grimaldi.
I believe that courtesy extents to all walks of life. # moderation/editorial rights of course. 🙂
From a Black voice perspective, I do miss my comrades, Ron and Day. Hope all is well.
For now, the Black voice on OIB has to relay Mama Bear’s Gen Now, 🤣
P.S As for my “blather” there is a sense of personal joy my writing, but to say “rather than thinking through your comments and posting them for public consumption, may be “disingenuous” BAM 🙂
To each their own, no?
However, truth can be said, express my writhing have gotten better for the days of G2/Finch.
So much so, the patience of Lennie Grimaldi /OIB are no longer needed to clean them up my writing for his readers consumption because they were pain staking incomprehensible with the constant My bads Though he still practices/holds his editorial rights. 🤣
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1so6Mvm1K20
My bad, John, Lennie’s courtesy doesn’t extend to Maria, #banned 🤣
Free Maria and burn the tapes 😃