State Senator Herron Gaston, also a city faith leader, writes “Violent rhetoric leads to violent outcomes.”
In moments of national tension, the words we choose matter more than ever. The headlines today are filled with anger, violence, and deep ideological rifts. But behind every viral video, every inflammatory post, and every talking head’s soundbite, there are real people — watching, listening, and shaping their worldview based on the tone and content of what leaders say.
Now is the time to step back and ask: what kind of nation are we becoming, and who are we becoming to one another? What kind of world do we wish to leave to the next generation? How will history judge our legacy?
We are a country blessed with freedom of speech — a right that must always be protected. But just because something can be said doesn’t mean it should be. Free speech is a right; responsible speech is a moral choice. And in a moment like this, when tempers flare and emotions run high, the tone of our public discourse has the power to either heal wounds or deepen them.
The stakes are not theoretical. Violent rhetoric leads to violent outcomes. History teaches us that. From the assassinations of the 1960s to the attacks on houses of worship in recent years, we have seen what happens when hate is normalized — when leaders wink at bigotry or treat cruelty as a tactic.
In a place like Bridgeport, we know all too well the cost of violence — and not just ideological violence, but real, irreversible loss. Our flags should fly at half-staff when we lose another young person to perpetual gun violence due to systemic and structural social determinants. All lives matter. When another mother weeps over a casket that should never have been filled. That’s when our city mourns. That’s when our community should be unified in grief, in action, and in love.
We cannot afford to reserve solemnity or honor for individuals who advocate division, or who demonize others on the basis of race, faith, gender, or ideology. Hence, we will be judged in death as we have lived in life. Therefore, we must appeal to the better version of ourselves, always.
People — especially the young — are looking to those in power: elected officials, influencers, pastors, community leaders, and public figures. What are they seeing? Too often, they witness rhetoric that escalates tension, dehumanizes others, and fuels fear. We are deceiving ourselves if we think this doesn’t seep into the fabric of our communities. Words have consequences.
It is not weakness to tone down hateful rhetoric — it is moral strength. It is not “wokeness” to reject cruelty — it is decency. And it is not censorship to expect our leaders to speak with both conviction and compassion — it is leadership. You don’t have to put somebody down to feel tall. And you don’t have to curse to get your point across.
This isn’t a call for everyone to agree. Democracy is built on disagreement. But there’s a difference between healthy debate and verbal warfare. There’s a difference between standing for principles and demonizing your neighbor.
We must begin again to speak to one another as people, not caricatures — as Americans, not enemies. That means resisting the temptation to generalize, to scapegoat, or to reduce the complexities of a person’s identity to a political label. It means calling out injustice without returning hate for hate.
Let’s remember the words of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., who faced real threats and violence, yet still chose the higher road:
“The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral, begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy. … Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.”
This moment calls for moral clarity and moral courage — the courage to benevolently amplify our voices in peaceful dissent to the world shouting, and the clarity to recognize that grief belongs to the innocent, not the incendiary.
Bridgeport — and every city like it — deserves leaders who are angelic truth-tellers, committed to making “good trouble” as exemplified by the late great (and my mentor) Congressman John Lewis. The next generation is both listening and watching, Let’s show them that true leadership isn’t about fueling fear, but about choosing humanity and standing in the truth.


You think praying for Narcissists will have positive results? Most people of faith would say yes or even hellyea. The sky is not falling any time soon. All dogs go to heaven and Charlie knew this:
https://youtu.be/HhEyYbmTh_Y?feature=shared
Senator Gaston is also a Pastor. Gaston states, “Let’s Choose A Better Way Forward.” What’s the better way?
This is what Gaston tried to lead us to:
The Bible’s command to “turn the other cheek,” found in Matthew 5:39 and Luke 6:29, is a teaching from Jesus about not resisting evil with violence or seeking personal vengeance. Instead of reciprocating harm, followers of Christ are called to respond with love, forgiveness, and generosity. This approach involves a creative resistance that refuses to let ill will overcome a will for good and love, ultimately demonstrating God’s character through selfless acts.
Jesus’s Teaching
Context: The phrase comes from Jesus’s Sermon on the Mount, where he contrasted his teachings with the Old Testament law of “eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth”.
Meaning: Jesus wasn’t advocating for passive weakness but for a different way of dealing with wrong. He was instructing his followers not to seek revenge for personal insults or injustices.
The “Why” Behind the Command
Demonstrating God’s Character: By responding to evil with love, followers show they are children of God, who “causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good”.
Transforming Culture: The teaching encourages a move away from a culture focused on honor and retaliation toward one of forgiveness and selfless love.
Seeking the Highest Good: The instruction is about seeking the highest good for everyone, even those who are acting poorly.
Creative Resistance: Turning the other cheek is a form of active, creative resistance that does not involve violent retaliation but instead uses acts of love and generosity.
Values versus violence.
Questions about meanings need to be heard, reflected upon, and carried on in conversation likely.
What do we wish for as Bridgeport residents? Safety of person, and security of property? We look to public safety by funding and taking pride in the acheivements of police, fire, and emergency personnel.
Nutritious food from stores where food deserts became a status quo and from attentive, generous neighbors.
Housing where public boards and commissions can deal with defects systematically and humanely when the free market and direct governance fails.
Come to public speaking. State your cause. See how representatives listen and respond. Maintain your basic peaceful intent by living through open, accountable, transparent, and honest values. Time will tell.
Values versus violence?
Senator Gaston can not save Black Rock.
When we are done Bombing it, do let us know the “Value” of your Property.
BRING OUT THE CANONS!
https://youtu.be/PEaZ5XUe0Mk?si=vhaojqOzs2bMs09e
Yes, people with values around openness, accountability, transparency, and honesty as your have heard me explain before, must stand up to undemocratic or divisive statements that provide no substance as credible and honest background to the “conversation” or discussion.
Did Senator Gaston talk about saving Black Rock? Where do you see a threat to Black Rock? Does your comment portend “violence”?
Then you go ahead and say the words: “When we are done Bombinb it”. What message are you presenting in a public place? Which CANONS do you control or wish us to imagine? And what does any of that relate to the “Value” of my Property that is a small City lot with my residence upon it.
When I stand up to speak at a public session previous to a City Council session, I keep all of my ‘Bridgeport citizen neighbors’ in mind? They are the folks not present, some not informed, and others not caring about participation in CIVIC affairs to maintain all of their rights, while paying attention to citizen responsibilities like informed voting. Will you be open and honest for a moment? Can you clarify your threatening comments? Time will tell.
Report this to the FBI. Send them a link of the commentary and my post. I’m laughing right now as I was expecting to read just about what you wrote. Did you click on the youtube link? Do you even know how to view YouTube videos? I’ll re-post just the link and all you have to do is click or tap any of the blue letters. I’ll be waiting for the FBI, ATF, CIA, SECRET SERVICE OR WHATEVER.
Here you go JML:
https://youtu.be/PEaZ5XUe0Mk?si=mxVRmcZirmCy1cF7
Fumbling for an answer filled with coded messages, including “saving Black Rock, bombing it (for the second time), and BRING OUT THE CANONS”, and finally relying on YOUTUBE TO complete your thoughts on the subject??
Best you can do in the facts and truth category? Time will tell.
It’s nothing personal Jackass, it’s just blogging business. It’s intended to give readers a laugh after enduring your boring daily questions. Hmm, maybe I should just make you walk the plank.
So a reposting of Senator Herron Gaston’s September 11 comments which were showing 121 LIKES when I last looked are showing more than 300 today.
Why does “blogging business” provide so much feedback to OIB that is positive for such comments while Gonzalez thinks it’s “intended to give readers a laugh” in their day.
Choosing a better way forward can be humorous at times, but for values of citizenship and democratic practices to prevail, more folks need to share their reasons for reading OIB. Values or repetitive namecalling, threats and violent subjects? How do you vote? Time will tell.
Bliowhard, one reason you are reading the positive messages of Senator Gaston, Is due to a small band of “civic minded” citizens and elected official who stepped up in support of him against the odds. I can proudly say that I made the right decision and the numbers of thumbs up, reflects that.
I didn’t stop there. For several years, sounded the alarm time and time again as to what the real Marilyn Moore was. All you would do was come to her defense.
When she finally made the right decision and retire, Again I stepped up to the plate and threw my support behind Senator Sujata. You stuck with the good old boys from Black Rock or Probably Bill Finch. Today and for quite some time, Bridgeport (Black Rock is in Bridgeport) will be in good hands as far as our State Senators go.
OIB is my playground and yes, I’m am a bully on this playground. You don’t like it? Stay off my playground.