Caruso’s Pension Revocation Legislation Addresses Bad Acts By Public Officials

When former State Rep. Chris Caruso served as co-chair of the Government Administration and Elections Committee he sponsored and shepherded a bill that won passage in the state legislature in 2008, revoking or reducing pensions of public officials and state and municipal employees for egregious acts.

Most recently, a Superior Court judge fully revoked the pension of former Hartford Mayor Eddie Perez.

Below see language from the bill that sets forth the revocation process.

Sec. 1-110a. Pension revocation or reduction for public officials and state or municipal employees convicted of crimes related to state or municipal office. Factors. Voluntary provision of information. Innocent spouse, dependents and beneficiaries. Notification to prosecutor. Severability of provisions.

(a) Notwithstanding any provision of the general statutes, on or after October 1, 2008, if any public official or state or municipal employee is convicted of or pleads guilty or nolo contendere to any crime related to state or municipal office in state criminal or federal criminal court, the Attorney General shall apply to the Superior Court for an order to revoke or reduce the pension of any kind to which such public official or state or municipal employee is otherwise entitled under the general statutes for service as a public official or state or municipal employee.

(b) In determining whether the pension shall be revoked or reduced, the Superior Court shall consider and make findings on the following factors:

(1) The severity of the crime related to state or municipal office for which the public official or state or municipal employee has been convicted or to which the public official or state or municipal employee has pled guilty or nolo contendere;

(2) The amount of monetary loss suffered by the state, a municipality or a quasi-public agency or by any other person as a result of the crime related to state or municipal office;

(3) The degree of public trust reposed in the public official or state or municipal employee by virtue of the person’s position as a public official or state or municipal employee;

(4) If the crime related to state or municipal office was part of a fraudulent scheme against the state or a municipality, the role of the public official or state or municipal employee in the fraudulent scheme against the state or a municipality; and

(5) Any such other factors as, in the judgment of the Superior Court, justice may require.

(c) If the court determines, or the Attorney General certifies, that a public official or state or municipal employee, who was convicted of or pled guilty or nolo contendere to a crime related to state or municipal office, voluntarily provided information to the Attorney General, the Auditors of Public Accounts or any state, federal or local law enforcement official concerning the commission of such crime related to state or municipal office by another public official or state or municipal employee who had a greater degree of culpability for such crime than the public official or state or municipal employee providing such information, the court shall not reduce or revoke the pension of such public official or state or municipal employee, provided such public official or state or municipal employee voluntarily provided such information prior to learning of a criminal investigation into such crime related to state or municipal office.

(d) If the Superior Court determines that the pension of a public official or state or municipal employee should be reduced, it may, after taking into consideration the financial needs and resources of any innocent spouse, dependents and designated beneficiaries of the public official or state or municipal employee, order that some or all of the reduced pension be paid to any such innocent spouse, dependent or beneficiary as justice may require.

(e) If the Superior Court determines that the pension of such public official or state or municipal employee should not be revoked or reduced, it shall order that the retirement or other benefit or payment be made to such public official or state or municipal employee.

(f) In all criminal proceedings in state or federal court in which the defendant is a public official or a state or municipal employee who is charged with a crime related to state or municipal office, the Attorney General shall notify the prosecutor of the existence of the pension revocation statute and the possibility that any fine, restitution or other monetary order made by the court may be paid from such official’s or employee’s pension.

(g) If any provision, clause or phrase of this section or of any order or any action of the Attorney General hereunder is adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, or if the applicability thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such judgment shall not invalidate the remainder of this section or such order or action, and the applicability thereof to other persons and circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

(June 11 Sp. Sess. P.A. 08-3, S. 2.)

0
Share

8 comments

  1. So then someone needs to lobby the Attorney General and ask for their pensions to be revoked. If however, they start spilling their guts which leads to someone else above them, then they might be able to save themselves. Wouldn’t that be an interesting outcome. So AJ, I recall many times you would say- “he’s my good friend”. If, there is anything more to tell I guess you will let the friendship go to protect your asset.
    Cheers!!

    2+
  2. Let’s tell the whole story.
    In 2011, it was Governor Malloy’s Pension Activation appointment that made Caruso’s journey worthwhile. In 2008, he felt discombobulated.

    2+
  3. LE
    If you propose to tell the “whole story” or to preview or coax out the same, why refer to Caruso’s journey or discombobulation. What is “there”? Can you say it for real. There is likely more money hanging balance relative to Dunn and Perez pension benefits for them personally than is threatened in the fiscal part of the Judge’s sentence it seems to me. What say you? Time will tell.

    0
      1. Mixing metaphors? One moment, a story teller with an immature outline? The next moment, you are a visual artist, working on canvas in the “fight ring” of forensic blogging. What do you think you are? Time will tell.

        0

Leave a Reply