Is Musto Spineless? Reform-minded Constituents Wonder About His Backbone In Pursuit Of Judgeship

Musto walking
Why is Anthony Musto walking away from government reformers? Not exactly the stuff of a judge.

Is State Senator Anthony Musto afraid? Does he have a backbone? Is he a puppet of Bridgeport’s political profiteers? OIB has received numerous copies of letters from constituents of Musto urging him to support the government reform bill sponsored by his Democratic peers in the State House Jack Hennessy and Auden Grogins that would prohibit city employees from serving on the City Council approving their own wages and benefits. So far Musto’s knees have buckled to the beat of party profiteers instead of voters who control his election future. A number of OIB political sources say Musto’s interested in a state judgeship and fears alienating local political support. OIB has sent Musto six emails requesting comment on the government reform bill. No response from Musto. The letter below from a Musto Bridgeport constituent who did not want her name revealed is representative of the letters Musto has received, yet publicly ignores. Such courage. Musto is up for reelection in 2014.

Dear Senator Musto,

This is a personal letter because it reflects my ethical principles, which are absolutely central to all my voting choices.

Directly to the point: Why have you not come out in favor of HB-5724? Why have you not even said anything of clarity that explains your position? Is there something not clear to you about the absence of ethics when Bridgeport city employees can sit on the City Council and vote on issues that affect their jobs and even determine their salaries?

Did you know that the council president, who is a salaried member of the current administration, just voted on a budget this week that approved many things including a $15,000 increase in his salary?? I am certain you are aware that six of the City Council members are employees of the City of Bridgeport. Not one of them recused themselves from the deliberations nor abstained from voting! Do you on any level find this to be ethical?? Do you consider this to be a way a government should be run?

I believe you already know that this can occur because State Statute Chapter 113, 7-421 has a loophole that allows it. I believe you already know that in order for this conflict of interest to be prohibited, an amendment to the statute contained in HB5724 must be adopted. Auden Grogins supports it. Jack Hennessy supports it. They recognize both the harm to their constituents and the lack of ethics implicit in the current practice. They are government representatives of whom we can be proud. SPEAKER SHARKEY WILL NOT BRING THIS STATE-WIDE SUPPORTED BILL TO A VOTE WITHOUT YOUR SUPPORT. SO … YOU ARE INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT HERE! CAN YOU … WILL YOU … STAND UP FOR WHAT IS RIGHT??

To be honest, I have voted for you previously because I am a life-long Democrat and (more to the point) because Auden Grogins encouraged me to do so. If you cannot show some maturity and courage here, you have lost my support. Also, I will work incredibly hard for whoever chooses to run against you in a primary and, if necessary, in an election. As it turns out, aside from friends here in Bridgeport, I have numerous friends and colleagues in both Trumbull and Monroe. When I spoke recently with only two of them so far about your silence, they were shocked and added that they would join me in encouraging others to vote differently if you do not come out in support of this simple and ethical bill.

Those six City Council members, I would imagine, did not abstain from voting because something (or someone) was meeting their needs. What are your needs? How about truly being both courageous and representing your constituents in an ethical and moral manner? Many of us are waiting for that side of you. The best moments in any person’s life are when they can be honestly proud of themselves. Please don’t disappoint us. Give us a Senator of whom both you and we can be proud!

0
Share

15 comments

  1. Senator Musto will not be able to win re-election if he does not demonstrate some leadership on this issue. This is a no-brainer and it’s time for him to stand up and do the right thing for the people and his constituents.

    0
  2. Musto has repeatedly been asked to take a stand on the proposed gun legislation and HB 5724 and has refused. Some get a response from him and others not at all. Either way, he has not taken a position. It is arrogant and reflects a total misunderstanding on his part of what his job as a State Senator entails. No stand is a stand and his calculations will backfire. If there is a primary against him, he will not win Black Rock. If he thinks the judicial selection process is not political, he is even more naive than we imagine. Those people will take a hard look at his record and decide he doesn’t have the spine to be a judge. This guy has got to go. Let him go practice some safe area of the law–it’s where he belongs.

    0
  3. That is exactly how it would appear on this blog. However, in the real world where the majority of his constituents are not political addicts, I think MUSTO IS PRETTY safe with the machine behind him. As JML would say, time will tell.

    0
    1. Steve, you give that so-called Bridgeport machine too much credit. Musto, if he seeks reelection next year, will lose Trumbull and Monroe to a Republican who qualifies for public financing. Musto has not yet won those towns under that scenario. That places a premium on running up a vote in Bridgeport. If Musto’s Republican challenger is from Black Rock, and Musto continues to remain silent on this issue, Musto will lose that precinct. The Republican will also run competitively in Brooklawn and the North End. This means Musto must run up large numbers in the other Bridgeport precincts to offset his losses. Musto has not built up enough prestige in his time in the State Senate to stick his head in the sand on this type of issue and expect engaged Bridgeport voters not to notice. And don’t discount a 2014 primary.

      0
      1. Well I wouldn’t want to bet my life on it nor do I really believe the machine is all that powerful. Maybe Walker or Jim Fox will attempt to knock him out. If I were making a small bet, I’d bet Musto would win. I am certain Himes, Finch, Malloy, Stafstrom and others will back him. Lennie, I know you are totally into politics and polls. I’d bet the average Joe will go Musto. Personally, I have only met the guy once and he responded to my letter to the editor regarding the Nob Hill Academy that was to be built by Beardsley Park.

        0
    2. Steve, when Musto was first put up for office the machine did very little to get him elected. In fact they wanted to see him lose. The machine was planning to run another candidate in the next election. Just a little history.

      0
  4. No politician is ever truly safe. Like ever. Musto is NOT PRETTY either. I am sure he thinks he is, but hey, the thinking woman sees the child inside the man, and Musto was clearly dropped on his head as a child. Not cute and insufferably boring. Next.

    0
  5. I sent the following email to Senator Musto May 15th–still no response–which is not smart politically and is also very rude.

    Senator Musto,

    Now is the time for you to show some political courage and join Jack and Auden in supporting HB-5724. To win next time around you need a big Bpt turnout–more than the Bpt DTC is capable of turning out in the parts of Bpt you represent–most especially Black Rock where support for HB-5724 is very strong. If you want our votes you need to step up and very publicly come out in favor of HB-5724.

    Sincerely,

    John D. Soltis

    0
  6. All show and no go. The only time Musto puts a foot in Bridgeport is election time. He doesn’t represent Trumbull or Monroe’s interest and shows nothing but disdain for Bridgeport. So … exactly whose interest DOES he represent?

    0
  7. I too received the above template email from Anthony Musto in re Conflict of Interest HB 5724.

    In pertinent part, he states: “At the local level, barring people from serving seems unfair as there are many issues facing the City Council that have nothing to do with the budget”

    How can Musto see the prohibition of city employees not being able to run for City Council as “unfair” when it is specifically stated in our City Charter that municipal employees cannot serve on the governing body? I can’t get behind the rationale it’s okay to not go along with what the city ratified in its charter just because he deems it “unfair.”

    UNFAIR.

    I’ll tell you what’s unfair. LOTS OF STUFF.

    UNFAIR that many of us bought our houses at the height of the market only to see their value drop to half, if we’re lucky.

    UNFAIR that taxpayers in this city pay through the nose for crap schools, little effective communication from the city on emergency planning, being plowed under for DAYS after the snowstorm in February while our neighboring towns all around us managed to dig out to a baseline navigability.

    UNFAIR that our elected Senate representative has lofty personal goals that clearly outweigh the rules established by thoughtful outlining of home rule by and agreed upon within our City Charter.

    I had a little chuckle when I read “members should recuse themselves when appropriate and if this is a problem it should be rectified by the voters.” HA! This is one of the most ridiculous things I think I’ve ever read from a supposedly educated elected official. How in the world should we rectify this situation with our “votes” when the whole system is rigged from top to bottom to ensure the status quo? Such utter b.s. I can’t even get my head around how he can state something like that, in writing, and with a straight face.

    Here’s the email from Musto:

    May 21, 2013

    Thank you for your letter regarding HB 5724 An Act Prohibiting Municipal Employees From Serving on Certain Municipal legislative bodies. It is always a pleasure to hear from constituents who take the time to share their opinions with me.

    I am not in favor of this proposal as I don’t believe the solution to the City’s struggles will be found by barring people from public service. While there is a certain potential for a conflict of interest, members should recuse themselves when appropriate and if this is a problem it should be rectified by the voters, not by arbitrarily denying someone the ability to run for a chance to serve in their local government. At the local level, barring people from serving seems unfair as there are many issues facing the City Council that have nothing to do with the budget.

    If the City Attorney has incorrectly interpreted the law, a lawsuit would be the appropriate way to address the issue, although the law has stood for several years without a legal challenge.

    I am focused on efforts I know will make a difference for Bridgeport, like attracting and fostering job creation, securing much needed state resources for education, brownfield remediation, municipal aid, and the public nuisance abatement bill, which I am proud to co-sponsor.

    Thank you again and please feel free to contact me with any comments or concerns on future issues.

    Sincerely,

    Anthony J. Musto
    State Senator

    Twenty-Second District~~~~

    0

Leave a Reply