Anti-Corruption Bill Does Not Prevent Ganim Candidacy

While former Mayor Joe Ganim tries to regain his old job setting up a high-profile reelection campaign for Mayor Bill Finch, several Bridgeport area residents and business community members testified in support of an anti-corruption bill that if passed would go into effect January 1, 2016 and not impact Ganim’s run this cycle, according to the proposed language. It does, however, allow Finch a platform to draw a contrast with Ganim forced from office in 2003 following his conviction on federal corruption charges. It also allows Ganim to talk about a second-chance society.

The Providence Journal has editorialized in support of the legislative proposal. Providence, Rhode Island is the home of the colorful Buddy Cianci who lost a comeback bid for mayor last year following his conviction on corruption charges more than a decade ago.

Current bill language “An act concerning restrictions on persons running for public office who have violated the public trust”

Section 1. (NEW) (Effective January 1, 2016) No public official, as defined in section 1-110 of the general statutes, who is convicted of or pleads guilty or nolo contendere in state criminal or federal criminal court to any (1) crime related to a state or municipal office, as defined in section 1-110 of the general statutes, or (2) substantially similar federal crime related to a federal office, shall be a candidate for public office, as defined in section 1-79 of the general statutes.

Sec. 2. (NEW) (Effective January 1, 2016) No individual who is convicted of or pleads guilty or nolo contendere in state criminal or federal criminal court to any felony offense committed as a candidate for nomination for election or election to any municipal, state or federal office under title 9 of the general statutes, or any other felony offense related to such candidate’s campaign, shall be a candidate for public office, as defined in section 1-79 of the general statutes.

On Wednesday several Finch surrogates testified in support of the bill before the General Assembly’s Judiciary Committee. Some excerpts from testimony as provided by mayoral spokesman Brett Broesder:

Here are excerpts from testimony in support of H.B. 7052:
Ø Rep. Ezekiel Santiago (D-Bridgeport) (Link: 1.usa.gov/1IU55PB): “We’ve seen corrupt politicians fall again and again. Clearly we need to do more to keep corrupt politicians from violating the public trust, and to boost confidence in investors and job creators. That’s why I support these two legislative initiatives: keeping corrupt politicians from being allowed to pick the pockets of taxpayers again (HB 7052). And, giving state prosecutors the tools they need to prosecute corrupt politicians at the state level (HB 7051). These measures are common-sense. I’m confident that they’ll help create jobs and move our state and city toward a stronger future.”

Ø Paul Timpanelli, President and CEO, Bridgeport Regional Business Council (Link: 1.usa.gov/1Flpb4a): “I am here today to speak in favor of House Bills 7051 and 7052, both of which, if adopted, would assist us in our efforts to improve the image of our state, which, today, continues to suffer, in terms of our mutual desire to have Connecticut seen as a good place to do business, from its ‘Corrupticut’ perception. Each of you knows, as well as I do, that our state continues to lag behind most other states in terms of our perceived ‘hospitality’ to business, and each of you knows, as well as I do, that there are many reasons why we have not progressed at a pace which quickens the growth of our economy … These two measures will, as you know, provide prosecutors with added tools to take on public corruption cases and will keep convicted corrupt politicians from ever being able to repeat intolerable behavior. By doing so, a clear message will be sent that Connecticut is a place that invites and encourages investment.”

Ø Ron Thomas, Connecticut Conference of Municipalities (CCM) (Link: 1.usa.gov/1DzuSwa): “Political officials who betray the public trust by engaging in criminal activity tear at the very fabric of a democratic society … For those municipal officials who do not comply with state and local laws, there should be measures municipalities can use to protect the public.”

Ø Brandon Hall, Principal at Forstone Capital (Link: 1.usa.gov/1GjOF3f): “We are investing millions of dollars in Connecticut, and creating or supporting hundreds of jobs. This legislation will show Connecticut is investing in its business. Public corruption hurts businesses and keeps investors away. I see positive momentum with the state moving forward and these laws would help ensure we don’t slip backwards. Right next door in New York, legislation similar to the ones we are debating today, are already in place. New York is protecting the job creators and taxpayers from corrupt politicians. It’s time we do the same here in Connecticut. This legislation will provide a meaningful deterrent and consequences to politicians whose actions could drive companies away from the state.”

Ø Rev. William Marshall, Founder of the Bridgeport Christian Life Center, Bridgeport, Conn. (Link: 1.usa.gov/1FlwfxA): “I believe in second chances. And, I believe in the power of redemption. However, I also firmly believe that we, as a community, are entitled to count on our elected officials to do the right thing. The Lord teaches us about accountability. I am writing in support of House Bill No. 7051 and House Bill 7052. None of us are without fault. My parishioners trust me to help guide them in the teachings of Jesus. I take that responsibility very seriously, and I will not betray their trust. I also trust in the honor of our elected officials. We all must. When people seeking office ask to come to speak to members of our church, I ask only for honesty. And, we expect them to live up to their words. We rely on our public officials to be the voice for the voiceless. There is no higher calling. When that trust is betrayed, we will forgive them. And, we also must hold them accountable.”

Ø Daniel Donovan, Co-Founder of Nu Power Thermal (Link: 1.usa.gov/1FlxInC): “I am here in support of HB 7051 and 7052 … We are acutely aware of what past acts of public corruption can do many years after the fact. We have on occasion been told outright by a large potential joint venture partner that they refuse to do business in Bridgeport based on the bad experience they had years ago with public corruption for municipal services. We are all very aware and extremely impressed by the improvements that the City of Bridgeport has made in this area over the number of years that corrupt public officials have been removed and punished. Mayor Finch and his team are both creative and responsible and are leading the country in their renewable and sustainable efforts. However, it is sometimes difficult to convey these improvements to a larger business community as demonstrated by our example. We need to have rules that prevent the legacy of corrupt officials and their actions continuing to impact the City of Bridgeport and the State of Connecticut as a whole. That is why I support HB 7051 and HB 7052.”

0
Share

17 comments

  1. Every person who submitted testimony is a Bill Finch puppet. Reverend William Marshall was appointed to the Charter Commission and supported taking away our right to vote for our BOE members.

    State Rep. Ezequiel Santiago should be ashamed of himself. I doubt the majority of his constituents would support his position on this matter. With all the criminal issues within his own family, this is somewhat hypocritical.

    Then we have the likes of Paul Timpanelli with the BRBC, Ron Thomas with CCM, Brandon Hall with Principal at Forestone Capital and Daniel Donovan, Co-Founder of NU Power Thermal. What do they all have in common? They all live in the suburbs.

    PUPPETS!!!

    0
  2. A little help, folks, please!

    How is Brandon Hall “creating or supporting hundreds of jobs”?

    I just need information. I’m not disputing it.

    I wrote to Mr. Hall, asking him to support the anti-conflict of interest bill HB 5886. He never responded. He never publicly supported HB 5866.

    Why does Brandon Hall not publicly support HB 5886 if he is so interested in good government?

    Same question for Paul Timpanelli and Mayor Finch.

    It’s puzzling that Mr. Hall, a highly educated millionaire, is pointing to New York State, where, he claims, similar anti-corruption laws are in place that are “protecting the job creators and taxpayers from corrupt politicians.”

    In his testimony, Mr. Hall asserts such laws, if enacted here in Connecticut, “will provide a meaningful deterrent and consequences to politicians whose actions could drive companies away from the state.”

    Really?

    Mr. Hall, check out the web site of the US Attorney for the Southern District of NY and the recent press releases, including the indictment of former recent leader of the NY State Assembly Speaker Silver on 1/15/2015 and other indictments of politicians for corruption.

    www .justice.gov/usao/nys/pressreleases/?m=03&y=2015

    How about enforcing the laws and ordinances already on the books?

    I don’t know, how about upholding the voter-approved city charter?

    Finally, what evidence is there the ongoing indictments of corrupt politicians in New York are driving out businesses from New York?

    0
  3. Bridgeport’s legislative delegation can’t even agree to a bill that would prohibit municipal employees from holding seats on elected boards. Give me a fucking break.

    0
  4. Ron Thomas, CCM, you are correct: “For those municipal officials who do not comply with state and local laws, there should be measures municipalities can use to protect the public.”

    So Mayor Finch does not regularly and deliberately assure the public of fiscal info as set out in the Charter and Ordinances, whether we talk about monthly reports including an audited final report for 12 months of each year; annual public meetings to solicit ideas from all parties on the capital budgets that are not held; and failure to provide purchasing reports annually and audits triennially among other things ignored conveniently and therefore complying with State and local law. So I ask more than once for the Sheriff and we are waiting. Why? It seems so many are out to stop public corruption but can’t see it because there is so much of it, authorities do not know where to start. And Bill Finch has companions on this journey. What rules are Tom McCarthy ignoring? Time will tell.

    0
  5. Could anyone on this blog imagine what it would be like if Lennie Grimaldi actually supported Ganim? Honestly, one post after another. lololololololol really???? I am listening to WICC what happened? I thought Joe was on at 6 pm no?

    0
    1. Ok apparently there was an acccidemnt and Mr. Ganim was stuck in traffic… WICC just played a 20 sound byte that I am certain any of the other Mayoral hopefuls will play ad nauseum.. He was innocent and this was a conspiracy …… socioplath! I forgot all of that.. Crazy Home Depot hours . I’m innocent, I’m innocent I tell ya!!

      0
      1. I thought Joe Ganim did an ok job on the radio. It is definitely going to get ugly that is for sure and no– this is not Bengazi or Hillarys emails, this is going to get very very ugly. But, I thought Joe Ganim remained cool and respectful for some of the mean calls. I am not sure if that is his anti depressents or a few beers but it worked well. Good job. Please do not run. Seriously, think about your family. Move past this.

        0
  6. So the way this language is written is that the crime has to be related to the person’s position while in office. In other words, murder is okay and you can run for offuce as long as it was not committed while in office. You can also embezzle, just as long it’s not related to your office. Am I understanding this currently? Wow.

    0
  7. Maria you are so right as usual. As I was reading the comments of the “bucket boys” I couldn’t believe Ezequiel had the nerve to comment on indiscretions. I marvel to this day that he got this far considering the role models he had growing up. However, I now have to question his mental capacity; I’m so disappointed in him and can’t wait to see him to tell him to his face what I think of him.

    0
  8. The hypocrisy swamp is the American culture. Calling bribery free speech ordained by the US Supreme court prevents any rational thought. I attended Ganim’s trial in New Haven every day. During the opening statement the defense stated no money will be found going to Ganim. That was exactly the case. The money paid was by check that was deposited. They never showed bank statements that revealed the withdrawal of the money. The closing argument ignored the cornerstone of the defense and the prosecution did too. If Ganim received cash payments they were hidden. The obvious defense should have been to cross examine every witness and demand an explanation of when and how payments were ever made to Ganim. Ganim wasted his legal fees. They testified about spending money but never about Ganim ever receiving any money.

    0
  9. The only Congressman doing time for bribes is Jefferson from LA who put $90,000 cash into his freezer. Americans are far worse than stupid, they are all in a trance. Jon Corzine the ex Senator and Governor of NJ before he was the CEO for MF Global that he busted–but ripped off 38,000 customers of $1.6 billion ($1,600,000,000) was never prosecuted. Please watch this:
    www .youtube.com/watch?v=O8nAi60Qivg

    The defense of Ganim should have prosecuted the US Attorney for protecting all five CT Congressmen and both Senators for the bribes they take on the record and the kickbacks on the record for those bribes.

    I want to know how much taxes was GE paying for their building on Boston Avenue. Now how much taxes is GE paying to Bridgeport? Did Finch take a bribe for that? Or is Finch stupid or does Finch hate our city?

    That ought to destroy Finch. Elect me the mayor of Bridgeport and I’ll search for any payments made by GE that got anywhere near Finch. If I were given a fair chance I would snap each Bridgeport citizen out of his/her trance. Then we’ll get the show on the road. Our boy Barnum was right. There’s a sucker born every minute and two to take him.

    0
  10. I take Daniel Donovan at his word for his experience in dealing with Finch on spectacular energy projects. Mr. Donovan is extremely sophisticated in this area. Why then has he made no effort to educate Himes, Sen Blumenthal, Sen Murphy and the other four Congress men/woman in CT about the hydrogen fuel cells in Bpt?

    My attempt has failed. I listen carefully to hearings on energy and hydrogen is never mentioned. The hydrogen company I favor is Hydrogenics because HYGS doesn’t use natural gas, they extract H2 from H2O by electrolysis. How can free water flowing down the Housatonic River and free sun and free wind be more expensive than drilling for gas and fracking that destroys pure ground water not be cheapest than any energy source?

    Obviously Daniel Donovan has a financial interest in this critical issue. It would be in his interest to advise NRG and Dominion to convert their entire production to hydrogen. The cost of energy isn’t just production. Insurance companies pay out massive sums for hurricanes and other weather damage. They also have a huge stake in this. Risk premiums for their customers would decrease by reducing the destruction from burning poison for fuel when hydrogen is perfect for electric production.

    Why don’t Bridgeport residents care about the devastation to West VA, Kentucky and other states from blowing the tops off mountains and dumping poison into rivers? There is a spectacular financial opportunity for Bridgeport to become the world’s capital of hydrogen power. Fuel Cell Energy is headquartered in Danbury with a factory in Torrington. The mayor of Bridgeport should invite Hydrogenics and others to move their headquarters here and have Fairfield U, UB, UConn, Yale and Sacred Heart offer courses for students to be employed by these hydrogen companies. FCEL does have some association with UConn.

    The primary barrier is political. Do you smell the stench of bribes that prevents Himes, Murphy and Blumenthal from ever mentioning hydrogen? What other reason besides bribes could there be?

    Can nuclear rods be made from any other substance than uranium? Mining uranium involves giant rocks that contain microscopic specks of uranium. The power needed for mining and refining these specks generates CO2 but we are told nuclear generates no CO2. Are they liars taking bribes or are they ignorant fools who really don’t know these facts? There has been 59 years of subsidies for this dangerous power source. Last year $14 billion was paid out of our treasury for nuclear power. How many hydrogen fuel cells could be built for $14 billion?

    While Germany, Japan and South Korea is finished with nuclear the USA is building five new highly subsidized nuclear power plants. I smell the stench of bribes.

    The anti-corruption bill is pure hypocrisy and the deep trance of absurdity in Bridgeport.

    0
    1. Ron Mackey, I don’t know if Mayor Finch needs an ass-kissing blog. My point was Lennie supposedly isn’t supporting Ganim and every post is about Ganim–did that just go over your head? Was my sarcasm not understood?

      0

Leave a Reply